Study on comparison between numerical algorithms and combined algorithms of multidisciplinaly design optimization

Tian Wei,Wenhui Fan,Li Gao,Wei Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1002-0470.2006.12.010
2006-01-01
Abstract:Considering that the comparisons of the basic algorithms of the multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) are still not perfect, the paper proposes the three dimension (3D) algorithms comparative method which considers accuracy, optimized efficiency and executive time, and the algorithms comparative 3D model which gives a reliable academic support to engineering, and for the first time, takes accuracy as an important index for algorithms comparing. On the basis of academic study, the paper compares numerical algorithms with combined algorithms and gets the result that the accuracy of numerical algorithms is much higher than that of combination ones when time change is not great, so that it provides more credibility to engineering applications. According to the results of comparisons, the sequence of algorithmic choice is provided for numerical algorithms and combined ones. Finally, it is validated that the 3D algorithms comparative method is reasonable and feasible through the analysis of the case of cell phone, which needs the choice of numerical algorithms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?