Abstract:Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) is a well-known NP-complete problem. Despite this theoretical hardness, SAT solvers based on Conflict Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) can solve large SAT instances from many important domains. CDCL learns clauses from conflicts, a technique that allows a solver to prune its search space. The selection heuristics in CDCL prioritize variables that are involved in recent conflicts. While only a fraction of decisions generate any conflicts, many generate multiple conflicts. In this paper, we study conflict-generating decisions in CDCL in detail. We investigate the impact of single conflict (sc) decisions, which generate only one conflict, and multi-conflict (mc) decisions which generate two or more. We empirically characterize these two types of decisions based on the quality of the learned clauses produced by each type of decision. We also show an important connection between consecutive clauses learned within the same mc decision, where one learned clause triggers the learning of the next one forming a chain of clauses. This leads to the consideration of similarity between conflicts, for which we formulate the notion of conflictsproximity as a similarity measure. We show that conflicts in mc decisions are more closely related than consecutive conflicts generated from sc decisions. Finally, we develop Common Reason Variable Reduction (CRVR) as a new decision strategy that reduces the selection priority of some variables from the learned clauses of mc decisions. Our empirical evaluation of CRVR implemented in three leading solvers demonstrates performance gains in benchmarks from the main track of SAT Competition-2020.

SAT solver with static and dynamic ordering decision making

SAT Solver with Static and Dynamic Ordering Decision Making

An Efficient Resolution Based Algorithm for SAT

Solving SAT Problem by Heuristic Polarity Decision-Making Algorithm

Integrating Advanced Reasoning into a SAT Solver.

EHSAT: an Efficient RTL Satisfiability Solver Using an Extended DPLL Procedure.

General Method for Solving Four Types of SAT Problems

RTSAT: A Hybrid Satisfiability Solver for RTL Circuits

SMT Solving for the Theory of Ordering Constraints.

clauseSMT: A NLSAT-Based Clause-Level Framework for Satisfiability Modulo Nonlinear Real Arithmetic Theory

Accelerating an FPGA-Based SAT Solver by Software and Hardware Co-design

A Folding Strategy for SAT Solvers Based on Shannon's Expansion Theorem

Enhance SAT Conflict Analysis for Model Checking

AutoSAT: Automatically Optimize SAT Solvers via Large Language Models

Hybrid Sat Solver Considering Circuit Observability

A survey of SAT solver

DNLSAT: A Dynamic Variable Ordering MCSAT Framework for Nonlinear Real Arithmetic

Generalized Conflict-directed Search for Optimal Ordering Problems

Between SAT and UNSAT: The Fundamental Difference in CDCL SAT

A Deep Dive into Conflict Generating Decisions

The Underlying Interactive Chain Structure In The Solution Space Of Constraint Satisfaction Problems