Oral Absorption Of Ginsenoside Rb-1 Using In Vitro And In Vivo Models

M Han,Xy Sha,Yj Wu,Xl Fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-916211
IF: 3.007
2006-01-01
Planta Medica
Abstract:This research attempts to clarify the cause for poor oral absorption of ginsenoside Rb-1 (Rb-1), one main ingredient of the well known Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) for curing hemorrhage. Caco-2 cell monolayers were used as an in vitro model to reveal the transport mechanism of Rb-1 across the intestinal mucosa. Moreover, the serum concentration-time profiles of Rb-1 after tail venous (IV), portal venous (PV), intraduodenal (ID) and peroral (PO) administration to rats were compared to evaluate the first-pass effects of stomach, intestine and liver. In vitro experiments showed that uptake by Caco-2 cell monolayers was temperature dependent, but was not influenced by cyclosporine A and ketoconazole. The change in the apical pH showed no obvious effects on the uptake of Rb-1. The uptake and transport were non-saturable, and flux from the apical compartment to the basolateral compartment (A-B) increased linearly with increasing concentration, which indicated a passive transport. Meanwhile, an apparent permeability coefficient of (5.90 +/- 1.02) x 10(-8) cm/s (C-0 = 1 mg/mL) predicted an incomplete absorption. The investigation on the pharmacokinetic behavior of Rb-1 after different routes of administration to rats showed a significant difference between PO (Fpo was 0.64%), ID (F-ID was 2.46%) and PV (F-pv was 59.49%) administration, and the first-pass effect of the intestine is more significant than that of the stomach and liver in the absorption process. In summary, elimination in the stomach, large intestine and liver contributed to the poor absorption of Rb-1, but the low membrane permeability might be a more important factor dominating the extent of absorption.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?