Difference in Oral Absorption of Ginsenoside Rg 1 Between in Vitro and in Vivo Models

Min Han,Xiao-ling Fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7254.2006.00303.x
IF: 7.169
2006-01-01
Acta Pharmacologica Sinica
Abstract:Aim: To clarify the cause of poor oral absorption of ginsenoside Rg 1 (Rg 1 ), the active ingredient in Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) used for treating hemorrhage. Methods: Caco-2 cell monolayers were used as an in vitro model to study the transport mechanism of Rg 1 across the intestinal mucosa. Moreover, the serum concentration-time profiles after peroral ( po ), intraduodenal (id), portal venous (pv) and tail venous (iv) administration of Rg 1 in rats were compared to evaluate the first-pass effects in the stomach, intestine, and liver. Results: Up take of Rg 1 by Caco-2 cell monolayers was temperature-dependent, but was not influenced by cyclosporin A. The change in the apical pH produced no obvious effect on the uptake of Rg 1 . The uptake and transport of Rg 1 was non-saturable; whereas the flux from the apical compartment to the basolateral compartment (A-B) increased in a linear manner with the increase in concentration, indicating passive transport. An apparent permeability coefficient of (2.5 9±0.17) × 10 −7 cm/s (C 0 =1 mg/mL) predicted incomplete absorption. A significant difference was observed between the po (F po was 3.29% at a dose of 1500 mg/kg), id F id was 6.60% at a dose of 1200 mg/kg) and pv ( F PV was 50.56%) administration methods, and the barrier function of the intestine was more significant than those of the stomach and liver in the absorption process. Conclusion: Elimination in the stomach, large intestine and liver contributed to the low oral bioavailability of Rg 1 , but low membrane permeability might be a more important factor in determining the extent of absorption.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?