Difference of CO2 Absorption between Retroperitoneoscopy and Laparosecopy

Hang WANG,Guo-ming WANG,Lian SUN,Biao ZHU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2005.05.013
2005-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: To study the difference of CO2 absorption between retroperitoneoscopy and laparoscopy. Methods: Sixty patients were equally divided into two groups, laparoscopy group and retroperitoneoscopy group, for comparison between them. The patients of laparoscopy group underwent cholecystectomy and high ligation of spermatic vein and those of retroperitoneoscopy group underwent renal cyst truncation. The depletion of CO2 in different time of operation was calculated by formula. Results: There was no difference between two groups in CO2 depletion in the first and the second 15 minutes. The CO2 depletion increased obviously in retroperitoneoscopy group in the third 15 minutes. Conclusions: The use of retroperitoneal path will cause obvious hypercapnia in patients than of peritoneal path. Something should be done to reduce the absorption of CO 2 in the protracted retroperitoneoscopy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?