Repair of nerve defects with de-acetyl chitin nerve conduit perfused with mesenchymal stem cells

Pei-xun Zhang,Bao-guo Jiang,Xiang-jun He,Fu-qiang Zhao,Zhong-guo Fu,Dian-ying Zhang,Hong-bo Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2005.02.042
2005-01-01
Abstract:Aim: Mesenchymal stem cells(MSC) in bone marrow could change into schwann cell in peripheral nerve in vitro. To study the effect of bridging nerve defect with de-acetyl chitin nerve conduit perfused with mesenchymal stem cells(MSC)and the differentiation fate of MSC in vivo. Methods: The study was finished in the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, People's Hospital of Peking University from April 2003 to February 2004. We cultured bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells of purified adult rats, passaged and proliferated. Setted sciatic neurologic defect models in rats. 24 SD rats were divided into 3 groups, with 0.5 cm defects in each right rear limb sciatic nerve 0.5 cm above the sciatic nerve bifurcation. Right lateral limb was chosen to be the experiment side and left side to be the control. The nerves were then repaired in the following manner 1 Group A: De-acetyl chitin nerve conduit bridging with perfused mesenchymal stromal. cells; 2 Group B: simple conduit bridging; 3 Group C: Nerve graft in situ after neurologic defect. Sciatic nerve functional index (SFI), electrophysiological and histology studies were detected after 4th weeks and 8th week postoperative. Results: Functional recovery of motor nerve and different degree of feeling was observed in each group. Regenerated nerve fiber in each group had crossed the suture 8 weeks after operation. The SFI in A, B, C group was(45.2 ± 1.32), (54.2 ± 1.47) and (66.5 ± 1.40). The motor nerve conduction velocity was (36. 10 ± 3.71), (32.89 ± 4.01) and(25.45 ± 3.78) m/s. There was significant difference of SFI, motor nerve conduction velocity and distal axons acreage in the three groups, Group A was better than Group B (P < 0.05). Group B was better than Group C(P < 0.05). Conclusion: The effect of bridging nerve defects with de-acetyl chitin nerve conduit perfused with mesenchymal stem cells is better than simple conduit bridging group, the simple conduit bridging is better than nerve graft in situ after neurologic defect group.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?