Brain functional recovery with the treatment of nimodipine and hyperbaric oxygen after brain injury

刘如恩,赵洪洋,王开颜
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2004.04.008
2004-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Although therapy of dysencephalia after brain injury with Nimodipine has been accepted, discussion on the therapy of dysencephalia with hyperbaric oxygen(HBO) and Nimodipine is still rare at present.OBJECTIVE: To explore an operative therapeutic method in brain functional recovery after brain injury.DESIGN: Contrast retrospective study was established based on diagnosis. Double-blind method was used in the assay of memory quotient of the patients.SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 110 patients with contusion and laceration of frontotemporal lobe, who were not treated with operation, were selected from the inpatients of Neurosurgery Department of Xiehe Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medicine College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology from July 1997 to October 2001. Their scores estimated by Glasgow Coma Scale were 9 to 12. There were eighty-three male cases and twenty-seven female cases. Their age range was 18 to 73 and average age was 43. All patients were finally diagnosed by skull CT.INTERVENTION: Four therapeutic methods were used: routine therapy,routine therapy plus Nimodipine,routine therapy plus Nimodipine and HBO,routine therapy plus HBO. Their memory quotients and the extent of cerebral trauma syndrome were detected to explore the brain functional recovery condition of these 110 brain-injured patients.RESULTS: The positive rate of memory quotient of routine therapy group was 73.5% . It was obviously 33.3% higher than that of Ninodipine group,28.6% higher than that of HBO group and 28.6% higher than that of Nimodipine plus HBO group. There always was significant difference when routine therapy group compared with Nimodipine group, HBO group and Nimodipine plus HBO group(χ2 = 17. 875 8, P < 0. 001), respectively. The positive rate of cerebral trauma syndrome in routine therapy group was 65.6%, in Nimodipine group was 28%, in HBO group was 28.5% and Nimodipine plus HBO group was 24%. The significant difference was found in routine therapy group compared with Nimodipine group, HBO group and Nimodipine plus HBO group(χ2 = 14. 015, P < 0.01), respectively. But no significant difference among Nimodipine group, HBO group and Nimodipine plus HBO group( P > 0.05) was found.CONCLUSION: The application of Nimodipine or HBO or Nimodipine plus hyperbaric oxygen is of important significance for the brain functional recovery of patients suffering from brain injury.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?