Abstract:Statement of problem: The use of composite resins for the restoration of posterior teeth is popular because of the improved performance and appearance of these materials. Wear resistance continues to be of particular importance when restoring large occlusal areas in posterior teeth. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative wear characteristics of 2 recently introduced nanofiller-based composite resins (Filtek Supreme, Premise) and compare them to the more traditional microhybrid (Point 4) and microfill (Heliomolar RO) materials that have been used for many years. Material and methods: Six specimens (2 mm thick and 15 mm in diameter) of each material were subjected to 3-body wear tests using the Oregon Health Sciences University Oral Wear Simulator to produce abrasive wear and attrition for all specimens using human enamel as the opposing cusp. Profilometric tracings of the worn surfaces were used to determine the relative abrasive wear, attrition wear, and roughness (Ra) of the composite resin substrate. The mean diameter of the antagonist enamel wear facets was determined under a measuring microscope. Qualitative SEM analysis was also used to assess the surface appearance of the resulting enamel and composite resin wear facets. The data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple range post hoc test (alpha=.05). Results: The results indicated that the composite resin type did not significantly affect the amount of measured attrition (P=.15) but did significantly affect abrasive wear (P=.02). The conventional microfill composite resin (Heliomolar RO) exhibited significantly less abrasive wear than the nanohybrid material (Premise). There was no significant difference in the average size of the opposing enamel wear facet generated by the different composite resin materials. Heliomolar RO resulted in a significantly rougher surface within the wear track than either nanohybrid composite resin (Premise) or microhybrid composite resin (Point 4) but was not significantly different than nanofilled composite resin (Filtek Supreme). Conclusions: The incorporation of nanofillers in 2 of the composite resin materials tested did not significantly improve their wear resistance or the amount of opposing cusp wear when compared to the traditional materials tested.

Fracture and Tribological Evaluation of Dental Composite Resins Containing Pre-polymerized Particle Fillers

Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials

An In Vitro Investigation Of Wear Resistance And Hardness Of Composite Resins

Friction and Wear Behaviors of Indirect Dental Restorative Composites

Evaluation on wear resistance of six composite resins and influencing factors in vitro

Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin.

Simulated oral wear of packable composites

The Nanomechanical and Tribological Properties of Restorative Dental Composites after Exposure in Different Types of Media

Wear Behavior of Light-Cured Dental Composites Filled with Porous Glass-Ceramic Particles

An approach to understanding tribological behaviour of dental composites through volumetric wear loss and wear mechanism determination; beyond material ranking

Investigation of stress and tribological properties of dental composite materials using FEM

Comparison of Flexural Strength and Wear of Injectable, Flowable and Paste Composite Resins

Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite

Mechanical and tribological properties of microparticulate and nanopaticulate reinforced polymer composites

Comparative Assessments of Dental Resin Composites: A Focus on Dense Microhybrid Materials

An in vitro investigation on the wear resistance of four types of composite resin

Effect of Nanofiller on Wear Resistance and Surface Roughness of Resin Composites.

Tribological Research of Resin Composites with the Fillers of Glass Powder and Micro-Bubbles

Friction and Wear Behavior of Dental Feldspathic Porcelain

Friction and wear of dental CAD/CAM composite resin

Effects of rotating fatigue on the mechanical properties of microhybrid and nanofiller-containing composites.