Study on Reliability and Unidimension of the Fine Motor Function Measure Scale for Children with Cerebral Palsy
SHI Wei,LI Hui,YANG Hong,SU Yi,ZHANG Jian-ping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2008.02.007
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze unidimension,internal reliability and external reliability of the Fine Motor Function Measure Scale (FMFM)for Children with Cerebral Palsy.Methods 696 children with cerebral palsy participated in the study. 481 males(69.1%)and 215 females,the average age was 30.0 months(SD:25.9months),ranged from 2 to 183 months;Types of CP in the children were spastic quadriplegia(n=239,34.3%),spastic diplegia(n=212,30.4%),spastic hemiplegia(n=185,26.6%),athetoid(n=30,4.3%),dystonic(n=21,3.0%),ataxic(n=9,1.3%).The 86 test items formed FMFM sampling scale. All samples were measured by FMFM sampling scale at least once.86 test items of FMFM sampling scale and 696 samples were analyzed by Rasch analysis using the partial credit model(PCM). Unidimension of scale was determined by item misfit criterion(FITI), and the FITI was set as mean-square values (MnSq) from 0.6 to 1.4, At the same time ultimate selected items of the FMFM were determined.Then test-free person measurement and sample-free item calibration of these items components of FMFM were analyzed. The first 23 samples were included for test-retest reliability study with a interval of 1 to 7 days. 49 samples were selected for interscorer reliability analysis.Results After three screenings, 25 items were deleted from 86 items of FMFM sampling scale. Among the remained 61 items, the misfit items were 3, less than 5% of all, suggesting that the majority items of this measure were good in unidimension, The mean standard error of item difficulty measuring was 0.09 (range 0.06-0.15), and the reliability of items was 1.00, showing that these items had good reliability. The item separation value was 38.09, showing that these items had good stratification of difficulty.The mean standard error of the sample ability measure was 0.30 (range 0.21-1.05). The reliability of samples was 0.99, showing that the FMFM had good reliability. The item separation value was 9.13, showing that the FMFM had good stratification of difficulty. finally formal FMFM Scale of 61 items was composed. At the same time the difficulty order and criterion of the ultimate selected item were determined. Correlations between sample ability scores of different item conditions were analyzed and results indicated that FMFM had good test-free person measurement, The Pearson correlation between sample ability scores under different item conditions was very high(r=0.976-0.995). Correlations between items difficulty values of different sample conditions were also analyzed and results confirmed that FMFM had good sample-free item calibration. The Pearson correlation between item difficulty under three sample conditions was very high(r=0.993-0.998). FMFM had good test-retest reliability (ICC=0.989 3,95%CI:0.975 3-0.995 4)as well as good interscorer reliability(ICC=0.996 1,95%CI:0.993 2-0.997 8).Conclusions FMFM had excellent unidimension,internal reliability and external reliability,which would lay good foundation for future usage of FMFM. Further studies about validity and responsiveness of FMFM are needed.