Research on the Development of Fine Motor Function of Upper Limbs in Children with Hemiplegia

SHI Wei,DING Jun-jie,YANG Hong,LI Hui,SU Yi,HOU Fang-hua,WANG Yi,YU Jian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2013.04.002
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To describe the patterns of fine motor development of both the affected and the contralateral upper limbs in children with spastic hemiplegia using nonlinear mixed effect model ( NONMEM) ,so as to further characterize the patterns of the fine motor development in children with spastic hemiplegia. Methods From 2000 to 2012,patients with congenital spastic hemiplegia were consecutively enrolled from 8 rehabilitation centers and 6 special education schools in Shanghai. Their fine motor functions were assessed with the fine motor function measure scale ( FMFM) for children with cerebral palsy ( CP) . Both the affected side and the contralateral side were assessed with FMFM,while the scores were analyzed respectively in the nonlinear mixed effect model. Two major parameters obtained from the model were used as clinical interpretations. The first parameter was 90% limits of fine motor function. The second was the age at which children were expected to achieve 90% limit of FMFM. Results A total of 536 children ( 360 male 67. 2% ,284 right hemiplegia 53.0% ,252 left hemiplegia 47.0% ) were enrolled in the study. The youngest child was 5 months old at first evaluation,the eldest 17.8 years old,and with average ( 3.4±3.2) years old. Altogether 792 pairs of FMFM scores were studied,1.48 pairs for each child. The average age for all 792 pairs of assessments was ( 4.1±3.8) years old. 73 children completed twice evaluations,while 54 completed three times or more. Stable limit model was used to fit the fine motor function model of the contralateral limb,while decline model was used to fit the model of the affected limb. Both models fit successfully. FMFM maximum score of the contralateral limb was 73.4,significantly higher than that of the affected limb,64.0. Age-90 was 2.7 years for the contralateral side and 3.3 years for the affected limb. After reaching the maximum,FMFM score of the affected limb began to decline and dropped 12% from the peak of 64.0 to 56.5. Conclusions The fine motor development limit of the affected limb was lower than that of the contralateral side. It took more time for the affected limb to reach its developmental limit and the score tended to drop after that. The training of fine motor functions for children with hemiplegia should be based on the different developmental features of both limbs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?