The evaluation of fixation, microscotometry and mERG examination in pre and postoperation of macular hole

陈晶华,黎晓新,徐秀兰
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the reliability of fixation, microscotometry and multifocal electroretinogram (mERG) examination for evaluating macular function by analyzing the results of operation of macular hole. Methods: Twelve patients with age-related macular hole were chosen by this study. The macular hole of these patients had been closed after vitrectomy in our hospital during 1999 and 2000. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope of Rodenstock was used to study fixation and scotometry. RETIscan3. 12 system was used to carry out mERG examination. First-order kernel was selected. Results: Six eyes had better distant vision. Four eyes stabilized while 2 eyes became worse. Nine eyes had improved near vision. Two eyes were the same while one eye dropped. All eyes but 2 had non-fovea fixation before operation. Seven cases got improved fixation while three cases remained the same. The light sensitivity of these eyes got much better, P < 0. 05. Four eyes had a volcano-shape ERG topography pre-operatively and regained spiky peak post-operatively. The other eight eyes had no improvement. The results of mERG from first and second ring before and after operation had no significant difference, P > 0. 05. Conclusions: Both the distant and near vision of eyes with macular hole had been improved after operation. Near vision can reflect central visual acuity better. Fixation and microscotometry are sensitive to the functional change of macular. mERG had no significant change after the operation. Its use in testing macular function is limited by variability, fixation and other factors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?