Abstract:The importance of the application of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for policies and plans is rapidly growing and will one day make the policies and plans environmentally and socially sustainable. While there have been legal requirements for SEA process and practice available in Australia and New Zealand for more than two decades, there is a dearth of information on how SEA is working in two separate jurisdictions. This comparative study on SEA practice is an attempt to fill this gap. The SEAs of two major urban plans of two major cities of two countries were reviewed and analysed to understand the practice of the SEA process. The SEA process of two urban plans of two countries was assessed against a set of good practice criteria. In addition, interviews were conducted with key informants, who were involved in the planning process, which provided valuable information. The study identified the key characteristics of two separate models of SEA practice alongside their advantages and disadvantages. The findings indicate that there are similarities and dissimilarities in SEA practices in both jurisdictions. The key similarities include the legal requirements for SEA, including community participation, in both jurisdictions. The key dissimilarities of SEA applications include the application of two separate models where the extent of flexibility, rigidity, integrative and separate issues related to the application of SEA varies. Also, there are common shortcomings identified in practice including relatively less attention is paid to socioeconomic issues and cumulative impacts. It is expected that the comparative study will help both Australia and New Zealand to learn lessons from each other, and thereby improve the practice of SEA in their own jurisdictions. The study also provides valuable insights by revealing some key characteristics of the SEA system of both countries. The findings of this study can be useful for the improvement of SEA practice for urban policy and plan by addressing the shortcomings identified in this study in both countries, and in other jurisdictions with a similar context.

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Its Development

Development and Practices of Strategic Environmental Assessment (sea) in China

Framework and Operational Procedure for Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment in China

Review on Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment of Land Use Planning in China

Retrospect and Prospect of SEA in China:From Conception to Legislation

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

Strategic environmental assessment implementation: variation across regions in China

DESIGNING A MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF URBAN PLANS IN CHINA

Strategic environmental assessment in coastal zones, especially Australia's

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Practice of Urban Planning in Australia and New Zealand: A Comparison

Strategic environmental assessment in areas beyond national jurisdiction: existing regimes, challenges, and prospects

Study on Transportation Strategic Environmental Assessment

Developing an indicator system to foster sustainability in strategic planning in China: A case study of Pudong New Area, Shanghai

Planning Environmental Impact Assessment Law in China: Status Quo, Implementation Problems and Legislative Reform

A Case Study on Strategic Environmental Assessment of Wuhan Outline of 11~(th) Five-year Plan

Public Participation in Strategic Environmental Assessment of Urban Plan in China: a Methodology and Case Study on Dalian Municipality

Challenges and lessons of implementing strategic environmental assessment in a critically endangered ecosystem

SEA rational paradigms outlook

Experts' perspective on the performance of Chinese technical guidelines for Plan Environmental Impact Assessment

PEIA in China:Management System Analysis

Building Methodology for Social-economic Analysis in Chemicals Management