Abstract:Wigner’s theorem says that symmetry transformations in quantum mechanics must be unitary or antiunitary [1]. The identity is unitary and symmetry, hence any symmetry that can become the identity by continuously changing a parameter has a unitary representation. On the contrary antiunitary maps are not connected to the identity, so it is not suitable to describe quantum physics. Therefore nature chooses unitary dynamics as its reasonable description. Nevertheless antiunitary transformations still have many interesting properties. The wellknown Kramer’s degeneracy comes from the time-reverse symmetry of quantum systems which contain an odd number of fermions [2]. Such time-reversal transformation is antiunitary. Usually an antiunitary operator can be decomposed into an antilinear transformation multiplied by a unitary operator. Many strange properties come from the antilinear part of such an operator. Recent progress in quantum information reveals that antilinear operator may play an important role during the study of quantum entanglement. In fact the famous Positive Partial Transpose (PPT) criterion [3], where antilinear map acts on the second particle of a bipartite density operator, provides a useful condition for testing quantum separability. Also antilinear map can be used as a useful technique to construct superoperators [4]. In the case of 2-dimensional Hilbert space, antilinear map is directly related to the universal-flip of a quantum state [5]. For high dimensional case, universal-flip operator doesn’t exist. However, the map |φ〉 =∑i αi|i〉 → |φ∗〉 = ∑ i α ∗ i |i〉 with respect to a specific basis {|i〉} still has many interesting properties. Here the state vector |φ∗〉 is often called as the phase-conjugate state of |φ〉.

Equivalence between SWH phase operator and Ban's phase operator revealed by virtue of |η〉 representation

Equivalence Between SWH Phase Operator and Ban's Phase Operator Revealed by Virtue of Representation

Reply to “comment on `equivalence Between SWH Phase Operator and Ban's Phase Operator Revealed by Virtue of the Representation' ” by A. Lukš and V. Peřinová

Reply To "Comment On 'Equivalence Between Swh Phase Operator And Ban'S Phase Operator Revealed By Virtue Of The Vertical Bar Eta > Representation'"

Formulation and Picture of Quantum Phase

Minimum uncertainty relation obeyed by SWH phase operator in two-mode coherent state

Time-Evolution Operator and Geometric Phase for A System with A Su(1,1)(+Sh(4) Hamiltonian

A Convenient Representation for the Two-Mode Phase Operator

Entanglement of amplitude and optical phase involved in the EPR eigenstate

Interaction Hamiltonian Fro Relative-Number-Phase of Ban's Phase Operator Formalism

Phase Operators for Atomic System in Schwinger Boson Representation and Their Properties

A Hermitian Opetator Conjugate to Two-Mode Number-Difference Operator

Two-Mode Phase Operator and Phase State Studied in Number-Difference Orthonormal Representation

Two-Mode Wigner Operator in Number-Difference-Operational Phase Representation

A Hermitian Operator Conjugate To Two-Mode Number-Difference Operator

03 23 7 v 2 2 1 Se p 20 06 State estimation from pair of conjugate qudits

New ⟨ Q , N || Representation for Studing Two-Mode Nonlinear Phase Operator

New Transformation of Wigner Operator in Phase Space Quantum Mechanics for the Two-Mode Entangled Case

A Possible Generalization of Dirac’s Phase Operator and Its Relation to Paul’s Phase Operator

Classical Weyl–Wigner Correspondence of Optical Field's Phase Operator