Left-Hemisphere Advantage For Topological Discrimination

Z. Lan,Lin Chen
1996-01-01
Abstract:Purpose. The present paper adopts an approach of invariance perception to the study of hemispheric asymmetry, characterizing visual primitives in terms of invariants in a hierarchy of geometries defined by Klein's Erlangen Program (Chen, 1982). Methods. 11 sets of stimulus patterns were designed to represent, in turn, discriminations based on difference between topological invariants of holes or inside/outside relationship and other geometrical invariants, such as collinearity (an invariant of projective geometry), parallelism(an invariant of affine geometry), orientation and size/distance (invariants of Euclidean geometry), controlling for other variables such as spatial frequency, global (more precisely, compound) vs. local(more precisely, component) patterns. The lateral t-scopic technique of stimulus presentation was used, and discriminabilities (RTs) with the 11 sets of stimuli were measured using the method of Task Variable x Visual Field/ Hemisphere interactions (Hellige and Sergent, 1986). While right-handers were chosen for all of the tests, a group of left-handers were selected, as a control, for two tests, representing discriminations based on holes and inside/outside relation respectively. Results. For the right-handers, all of 11 experiments consistently demonstrate significant RVF/teft hemisphere dominant for topological discrimination, and, in contrast, demonstrate significant LVF/right hemisphere dominant or no hemispheric asymmetry for other geometrical invariants. In contrast, the left-handers all show LVF/right hemisphere dominant for topological invariants. Conclusion. The clear-cut results, which showing topological hemispheric asymmetry, not only indicates a novel and fundamental hemispheric dichotomy based on the invariance perception approach but also provides a useful guide for thinking about the neurological substrata of topological perception.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?