Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Nano-Porous Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Pigs.

Chen Ming,Zheng Bo,Wu Zheng,Peng Hong-yu,Wang Xin-gang,Zhang Bin,Huo Yong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20123267
2013-01-01
Abstract:Background Drug-eluting stents represent a major advance in interventional cardiology. However, the current drug-eluting stents have significant limitations. One of the major problems is very late stent thrombosis, which is likely caused by inflammation and a hypersensitivity reaction related to a polymer on the stent. A polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent with a unique nano-porous surface has been developed. This study aimed to evaluate this novel polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent for its efficacy and safety in a pig model.Methods Stents were directly coated with sirolimus (a drug concentration of 2.2 mu g/mm(2) on the stent surface). The polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents (PFSES) were compared to standard polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents (POSES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) in 18 pigs.Results At one month the degree of neointimal hyperplasia was similar between the two sirolimus-eluting stent groups and was significantly less compared to BMS ((1.93 +/- 0.51) mm(2), (1.57 +/- 0.69) mm(2) vs. (4.45 +/- 1.05) mm(2), P <0.05) At three months, PFSES maintained the low level of neointima ((2.41 +/- 0.99) mm(2) vs. (4.32 +/- 1.16) mm2, P <0.05), whereas POSES had developed significant neointimal proliferation similar to BMS. The inflammation level was significantly higher in POSES when compared with BMS three months post-implantation (2.50 +/- 0.55 vs. 0.83 +/- 0.75, P <0.05) whereas PFSES showed a low level of inflammation comparable to POSES (1.33 +/- 0.52 vs. 2.50 +/- 0.55, P <0.05).Conclusion The PFSES is effective and safe, and appears to be superior to standard PCSEs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?