Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of photoselecticve vaporization of the prostate(PVP)with potassium-titanyl-'phosphate laser(KTP)in the treatment of lower urinary tract obstruction(LUTS)caused by advanced prostate cancer. Methods Clinical data of 33 patients with LUTS caused by advanced prostate cancer treated by PVP were analyzed retrospectively.The mean age was(76±6)years.A1l the cases were confirmed with prostate cancer with pathologic exami- nation.Of whom,1 8 were in clinical stage T3 and 1 5 in stage T4.Prostate volumes were 36-1 40 ml (53±28)m1.Preoperative and1-month,6-month follow up data of Quality of life(QOI.),International prostate symptom score(IPSS),maximum urinary flow rate(Qmax),PSA and residual urine(RU)were analyzed. Results There were 1 9 primary prostate cancer patients accepted both PVP and surgical castration and another 14 prostate cancer patients had LUTS after orchectomy.Of these patients.15 had a history of urinary retention.The pre-operative data of IPSS,QOL,Qmax,PSA and RU were 28.2±3.6,5.0±0.7,4.7-10.1 ml／s,54.9±34.8 ng／ml and 126.0±25.2 m1.All the surgeries went on successfully and 28 cases could urinate immediately after removal of the catheter 3-4 davs af-ter surgery.Five patients were with dysuria and re-catheterized and all of them had voluntary mieturi- tion in the end.The data of 1PSS,QOL,Q…,PSA and RU changed to 14.6+--2.8,3.1±0.4,13.2 ±5.6,16.3±13.4,24.6±5.9 and 14.2±3.3,3.4±0.5,12.2±3.4,8.0±6.5,31.1±8.7 1 month and 6 months after PVP treatment respectively.Postoperative complications included hematuria and transient urinary incontinence.IPSS,QOL,Qmax,PSA and RU improved significantly in patients after 1-month and 6-month followed up compared with preoperative data.There was no difference of IPSS,QOL,Qmax and RU comparing 1-month and 6-month data after PVP treatment. Conclusions PVP can be used safely and effectively to relieve LUTS caused by advanced prostate cancer and to im- prove the QOL,reduce the tumor load,postpone cancer progressing and will not cause tumor cell spreading.PVP is a safe,efficient and minimal invasive treatment therapeutic option for locally ad- vanced prostate cancer. Key words: Prostatic neoplasms; Urethral obstruction; Laser surgery; Transurethral re-section of prostate

GreenLight HPS 120-W Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate As Early Therapy for Acute Urinary Retention in Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients

GreenLight laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate for treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with different post-void residual urine

Green Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate Along with Maximal Androgen Blockade for Advanced Prostate Cancer

Photoselective Laser Vaporization of the Prostate in the Treatment of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Advanced-Stage Prostate Cancer: a Single-Center Experience.

Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of 532 nm Laser Photovaporization of the Prostate with GreenLight 180 W XPS in Men with Acute Urinary Retention

GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective randomized trial.

Photoselecticve Vaporization of the Prostate with Potassium-Titanyl-phosphate Laser in the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction Caused by Advanced Prostate Cancer

Photo-Selective Vaporization Of The Prostate With Green-Light Hps 120-W Laser For Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 36 Months' Follow-Up

[Effect and safety of GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization of the prostate for different benign prostatic hyperplasia populations]

Greenlight photoselective vaporization prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate with GreenLight 120-W Laser Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

[Transurethral 180 W front-firing GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]

Photoselective potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization prostatectomy for the treatment of high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

The role of photovaporization of the prostate in small volume benign prostatic hyperplasia and review of the literature

Evaluation of Green Light PVP on Treating High-Risk Old Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

"Five-Step" Vaporization of the Prostate Using 180-W XPS Greenlight Laser in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia of Large Volume: Improved Efficacy and Safety

[Safety and Effectiveness of GreenLight 120-W Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis].

Short-term Clinical Evaluation of Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate for the Patients with Benign Hyperplasia of Prostate in Anti-Coagulanting Status

Photoselective Green-Light Laser Vaporisation Vs. TURP for BPH: Meta-Analysis

Comparison of photoselective green light laser vaporisation versus traditional transurethral resection for benign prostate hyperplasia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and prospective studies

[Evaluation of Greenlight Photoselective Vaporization of Prostate and Plasmakinetic Resection of Prostate for the Treatment of Eldly Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Men with High Surgical Risk: a Prospective Randomised Control Trial].