Comment on "chromium Contamination Accident in China: Viewing Environment Policy of China".
Heran Zheng,Ruonan Li,Shixiong Cao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es203685w
IF: 11.4
2011-01-01
Environmental Science & Technology
Abstract:W are writing to comment on the viewpoint “Chromium Contamination Accident in China: Viewing Environment Policy of China” by Yang Gao, which appeared in a recent issue of Environmental Science and Technology. This paper reflected the reality that China’s environmental policies are difficult for regional governments to implement, especially compared with the easier task of promoting economic development. To avoid misleading readers who might be unfamiliar with the context for this viewpoint, we would like to clarify a few key points. In fact, this chromium contamination accident is not an isolated case in China. In recent decades, accidents caused by releases of hazardous wastes in China have increased sharply. More than 30 hazardous waste accidents have occurred since 2009. Many have had severe human consequences. For example, a lead contamination accident in Wugang City in Yunnan province led to the poisoning of 1354 children. This is just one extreme example, but there are many less dramatic examples. The result is that a huge potential hazard caused by heavy metal pollution exists in China. Zhang Lijun, vice-minister of China’s Ministry of Environmental Protection, noted that more than 100 cases of pollution caused by chromium residues have affected a total area of around 50 thousand km; the chromium level at some polluted sites is 100 times the safe level. Although the government has passed more than 100 environmental policies, laws, and regulations, all of which seem promising, implementing these measures has been difficult. Currently, economic development is the main criterion (sometimes the only criterion) used to judge a government official’s performance, so there is no incentive to balance economic objectives against the environmental and social impacts of development. In addition, the maximum fines that are prescribed for environmental violations are so small that polluting enterprises find it less expensive to pay these fines than to adopt environmentally friendly technologies or appropriate treatment methods. Based on the current government performance appraisal system, local governments usually ignore the environmental regulations and pollution emissions by the enterprises in their jurisdiction, and there have been suggestions that some government officials may be secretly in collusion with the managers of polluting enterprises. The lack of effective accountability and supervision systems is a primary reason for these problems and for the ineffective enforcement of regulations. Without effective supervision or timely feedback from society, local stakeholders are easily ignored and their needs may even be sacrificed by the government. Hence, it is increasingly urgent to implement reforms and establish institutions that will be effective and that will provide the necessary accountability and supervision. We believe that, this will create a more favorable sociopolitical environment in which officials feel comfortable making and enforcing policies and laws that will improve China’s future sustainability.