Abstract:Abstract Background Mental workload is a critical consideration in complex man–machine systems design. Among various mental workload detection techniques, multimodal detection techniques integrating electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals have attracted considerable attention. However, existing EEG–fNIRS-based mental workload detection methods have certain defects, such as complex signal acquisition channels and low detection accuracy, which restrict their practical application. Methods The signal acquisition configuration was optimized by analyzing the feature importance in mental workload recognition model and a more accurate and convenient EEG–fNIRS-based mental workload detection method was constructed. A classical Multi-Task Attribute Battery (MATB) task was conducted with 20 participating volunteers. Subjective scale data, 64-channel EEG data, and two-channel fNIRS data were collected. Results A higher number of EEG channels correspond to higher detection accuracy. However, there is no obvious improvement in accuracy once the number of EEG channels reaches 26, with a four-level mental workload detection accuracy of 76.25 ± 5.21%. Partial results of physiological analysis verify the results of previous studies, such as that the θ power of EEG and concentration of O 2 Hb in the prefrontal region increase while the concentration of HHb decreases with task difficulty. It was further observed, for the first time, that the energy of each band of EEG signals was significantly different in the occipital lobe region, and the power of $$\beta_{1}$$ β 1 and $$\beta_{2}$$ β 2 bands in the occipital region increased significantly with task difficulty. The changing range and the mean amplitude of O 2 Hb in high-difficulty tasks were significantly higher compared with those in low-difficulty tasks. Conclusions The channel configuration of EEG–fNIRS-based mental workload detection was optimized to 26 EEG channels and two frontal fNIRS channels. A four-level mental workload detection accuracy of 76.25 ± 5.21% was obtained, which is higher than previously reported results. The proposed configuration can promote the application of mental workload detection technology in military, driving, and other complex human–computer interaction systems.

Identifying changes in human operator mental workload by locally linear embedding and support vector clustering approaches

Identification of Temporal Variations in Mental Workload Using Locally-Linear-embedding-based EEG Feature Reduction and Support-Vector-machine-based Clustering and Classification Techniques

Recognition of Mental Workload Levels under Complex Human–Machine Collaboration by Using Physiological Features and Adaptive Support Vector Machines

Mental workload recognition using ECG and machine learning in simulated flight tasks

Pattern Classification of Instantaneous Cognitive Task-Load Through Gmm Clustering, Laplacian Eigenmap, and Ensemble Svms

Neurophysiological Feature-Based Detection of Mental Workload by Ensemble Support Vector Machines

Assessment of Mental Workload Based on Multi-Physiological Signals

Identification of Cognitive Workload during Surgical Tasks with Multimodal Deep Learning

Classifying Human Operator Functional State Based on Electrophysiological and Performance Measures and Fuzzy Clustering Method.

EEG-Based Mental Workload Assessment in a Simulated Flight Task Using Single-Channel Brain Rhythm Sequence

Mental Workload Classification Based on Ignored Auditory Probes and Spatial Covariance

Mental workload estimation with electroencephalogram signals by combining multi-space deep models

EEG-based Mental Workload Recognition Related to Multitasking

Comparison Analysis of Different Time-Scale Heart Rate Variability Signals for Mental Workload Assessment in Human-Robot Interaction

Generic Mental Workload Measurement Using a Shared Spatial Map Network With Different EEG Channel Layouts

Optimized electroencephalogram and functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based mental workload detection method for practical applications

Determining Cognitive Workload Using Physiological Measurements: Pupillometry and Heart-Rate Variability

Using Multimodal Methods and Machine Learning to Recognize Mental Workload: Distinguishing Between Underload, Moderate Load, and Overload

Assessing Cognitive Mental Workload Via EEG Signals and an Ensemble Deep Learning Classifier Based on Denoising Autoencoders

Evaluating the performance of the cognitive workload model with subjective endorsement in addition to EEG