Abstract:Cognitive workload is a crucial factor in tasks involving dynamic decision-making and other real-time and high-risk situations. Neuroimaging techniques have long been used for estimating cognitive workload. Given the portability, cost-effectiveness and high time-resolution of EEG as compared to fMRI and other neuroimaging modalities, an efficient method of estimating an individual’s workload using EEG is of paramount importance. Multiple cognitive, psychiatric and behavioral phenotypes have already been known to be linked with “functional connectivity”, i.e., correlations between different brain regions. In this work, we explored the possibility of using different model-free functional connectivity metrics along with deep learning in order to efficiently classify the cognitive workload of the participants. To this end, 64-channel EEG data of 19 participants were collected while they were doing the traditional n-back task. These data (after pre-processing) were used to extract the functional connectivity features, namely Phase Transfer Entropy (PTE), Mutual Information (MI) and Phase Locking Value (PLV). These three were chosen to do a comprehensive comparison of directed and non-directed model-free functional connectivity metrics (allows faster computations). Using these features, three deep learning classifiers, namely CNN, LSTM and Conv-LSTM were used for classifying the cognitive workload as low (1-back), medium (2-back) or high (3-back). With the high inter-subject variability in EEG and cognitive workload and recent research highlighting that EEG-based functional connectivity metrics are subject-specific, subject-specific classifiers were used. Results show the state-of-the-art multi-class classification accuracy with the combination of MI with CNN at 80.87%, followed by the combination of PLV with CNN (at 75.88%) and MI with LSTM (at 71.87%). The highest subject specific performance was achieved by the combinations of PLV with Conv-LSTM, and PLV with CNN with an accuracy of 97.92%, followed by the combination of MI with CNN (at 95.83%) and MI with Conv-LSTM (at 93.75%). The results highlight the efficacy of the combination of EEG-based model-free functional connectivity metrics and deep learning in order to classify cognitive workload. The work can further be extended to explore the possibility of classifying cognitive workload in real-time, dynamic and complex real-world scenarios.

Measuring Cognitive Workload Using Multimodal Sensors

Mental workload assessment by monitoring brain, heart, and eye with six biomedical modalities during six cognitive tasks

Identification of Cognitive Workload during Surgical Tasks with Multimodal Deep Learning

Recognition and Evaluation of Mental Workload in Different Stages of Perceptual and Cognitive Information Processing Using a Multimodal Approach.

Unobtrusive measurement of cognitive load and physiological signals in uncontrolled environments

Evaluating the performance of the cognitive workload model with subjective endorsement in addition to EEG

In-Ear SpO2 for Classification of Cognitive Workload

Assessment of Mental Workload Based on Multi-Physiological Signals

Physiological Measures of Mental Workload: Evidence from Empirical Studies

MBioTracker: Multimodal Self-Aware Bio-Monitoring Wearable System for Online Workload Detection

Mental workload recognition using ECG and machine learning in simulated flight tasks

Cognitive workload estimation using physiological measures: a review

Assessing Cognitive Workload Using Cardiovascular Measures and Voice

Perceptions of cognitive workload measurement using multimodal sensors in surgery

Machine Learning models for the Identification of Cognitive Tasks using Autonomic Reactions from Heart Rate Variability and Electrodermal Activity

Optimized electroencephalogram and functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based mental workload detection method for practical applications

EEG-based Mental Workload Recognition Related to Multitasking

Subject-Specific Cognitive Workload Classification Using EEG-Based Functional Connectivity and Deep Learning

Real-Time Cognitive Workload Monitoring Based on Machine Learning Using Physiological Signals in Rescue Missions

Determining Cognitive Workload Using Physiological Measurements: Pupillometry and Heart-Rate Variability

A Multimodal System for Assessing Alertness Levels Due to Cognitive Loading