An Improved Weighted Averaging Method for Evidence Fusion

Ye Li,Li Xu,Yagang Wang,Xiaoming Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7010-6_88
2013-01-01
Abstract:D-S evidence theory is an important mathematical tool for uncertainty reasoning. However, it may lead to counterintuitive conclusions when combining conflicting evidences. In order to overcome this disadvantage, one can modify the evidences before Dempster’s rule of combination. One representative method is to assign a weight to each evidence according to its credibility degree based on the concept of distance (or similarity) between two evidences. This method can gain more robust fusion results than many other known methods. However, it may fail to correctly converge according to the cardinality of the sets in the evidence. When evidence conflicts with other evidences, the evidence may lose impact on the combination result. Moreover, the combined mass is nonmonotonic even though evidence varies monotonically. Therefore, the method still leads to counterintuitive or confusing results. This paper brings forward an improved weighted averaging method involving a new similarity measure between evidences and a new combination rule. The numerical examples show the proposed method well solves the above problems.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?