Abstract:Recently, the great potential of seismic dispersion attributes in oil and gas exploration has attracted extensive attention. The frequency-dependent amplitude versus offset (FAVO) technology, with dispersion gradient as a hydrocarbon indicator, has developed rapidly. Based on the classical AVO theory, the technology works on the assumption that elastic parameters are frequency-dependent, and implements FAVO inversion using spectral decomposition methods, so that it can take dispersive effects into account and effectively overcome the limitations of the classical AVO. However, the factors that affect FAVO are complicated. To this end, we construct a unified equation for FAVO inversion by combining several Zoeppritz approximations. We study and compare two strategies respectively with (strategy 1) and without (strategy 2) velocity as inversion input data. Using theoretical models, we investigate the influence of various factors, such as the Zoeppritz approximation used, P- and S-wave velocity dispersion, inversion input data, the strong reflection caused by non-reservoir interfaces, and the noise level of the seismic data. Our results show that FAVO inversion based on different Zoeppritz approximations gives similar results. In addition, the inversion results of strategy 2 are generally equivalent to that of strategy 1, which means that strategy 2 can be used to obtain dispersion attributes even if the velocity is not available. We also found that the existence of non-reservoir strong reflection interface may cause significant false dispersion. Therefore, logging, geological, and other relevant data should be fully used to prevent this undesirable consequence. Both the P- and S-wave related dispersion obtained from FAVO can be used as good indicators of a hydrocarbon reservoir, but the P-wave dispersion is more reliable. In fact, due to the mutual coupling of P- and S-wave dispersion terms, the P-wave dispersion gradient inverted from PP reflection seismic data has a stronger hydrocarbon detection ability than the S-wave dispersion gradient. Moreover, there is little difference in using post-stack data or pre-stack angle gathers as inversion input when only the P-wave dispersion is desired. The real application examples further demonstrate that dispersion attributes can not only indicate the location of a hydrocarbon reservoir, but also, to a certain extent, reveal the physical properties of reservoirs.

Direct Inversion For A Fluid Factor And Its Application In Heterogeneous Reservoirs

Reservoir Fluid Identification Method Incorporating Squirt Flow and Frequency-Dependent Azimuthal Anisotropic Inversion

Seismic nonlinear frequency-dependent inversion for viscoelastic media based on a modified scattering coefficient approximation

Bayesian AVOAz Inversion of Fluid and Anisotropy Parameters Using Gibbs Sampling With AISM Algorithm

Fluid identification and effective fracture prediction based on frequency-dependent AVOAz inversion for fractured reservoirs

Bayesian Frequency-Dependent AVO Inversion Using an Improved Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Quantitative Gas Saturation Prediction in a Thin Layer

Geofluid Discrimination in Stress-Induced Anisotropic Porous Reservoirs Using Seismic AVAZ Inversion

Direct Reservoir Parameter Estimation Using Joint Inversion of Marine Seismic AVA and CSEM Data

Prestack waveform inversion based on analytical solution of the viscoelastic wave equation

Dynamic Characterization of Reservoirs Constrained by Time-Lapse Prestack Seismic Inversion

An exact Zoeppritz based prestack inversion using whale optimization particle filter algorithm under Bayesian framework

Mesoscopic Wave-Induced Fluid Flow Effect Extraction by Using Frequency-Dependent Prestack Waveform Inversion

P-P and Dynamic Time Warped P-SV Wave AVA Joint-Inversion with ℓ 1–2 Regularization

Pre-stack Seismic Probabilistic Inversion Method for Lithofacies and Elastic Parameters of Volcanic Reservoir

The applicability and underlying factors of frequency-dependent amplitude-versus-offset (AVO) inversion

FMG_INV, a Fast Multi-Gaussian Inversion Method Integrating Well-Log and Seismic Data

Reservoir-Parameter Identification Using Minimum Relative Entropy-Based Bayesian Inversion of Seismic Ava and Marine Csem Data

Multi-Wave Stochastic Inversion Physical Parameters Prediction Method Driven by Linearized Rock Physics

Hybrid-Driven High-Resolution Prestack Seismic Inversion

Multiwave Pre-Stack AVA Parameter Inversion in TI Media

Prestack seismic inversion using a Rytov-WKBJ approximation