Abstract:A systematic comparative study of theoretical geometry optimization on all of the first- and second-row gas-phase inorganic molecules collected in the 77th ed. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics was carried out. The routinely examined theoretical levels for all of the molecules were the analytical gradient MP2(full), B3LYP acid B3PW91 with 6-31G(d), 6-31G(d,p), 6-311G (d,p) and 6-3110(2 d,p) basis sets. Additional examined theoretical levels for the diatomic, tri-atomic and most of the poly-atomic species were QCISD(T)/6-31G( d,p) and QCISD(T)/ 6-311G( d,p) numerical optimizations. For the diatomic hydrides, extra numerical QCISD(T)/ 6-31G(d) and analytical QCISD(full)/6-311G( d,p) optimizations were included. For the poly-atomic species, the computationally less expensive BPW91 with three basis sets were also examined. The overall performances of the theoretical methods and the basis sets were analyzed in means of the average deviations (AD) and the average absolute deviations (AAD). It was shown that all of the theoretical methods re-produced the bond angles reasonably well. For the bond lengths at the same basis sets, B3PW91 performed the best, MP2 the next and then B3LYP. 6-311G(d,p) basis sets greatly improved the QCISD(T) results from those of 6-31G(d,p). In all of the theoretical methods examined, BPW91 resulted in the largest AAD errors. The AAD values tin pm) for all of the bond lengths in this study were summarized in Table 7 of the text, e.g., 1.50 for B3PW91/ 6-3110(2 d,p), 1.73 for B3LYP/6-311G(2 d,p), 1.75 for MP2(full) /6-311G(2 d,p), 1.82 for B3PW91/6-311G(d,p), 1.82 for QCISD(T, FC)/6-311G(d,p), 1.84 for B3PW91/6-31G(d), 1.87 for MP2(full)/6-311G(d,p), 2.09 for MP2(full)/6-31G( d,p), 2.11 for B3LYP/6-311G (d,p), 2.12 for B3LYP/6-31G(d), 2.14 for QCISD(T, FC)/6-31G(d,p), 2.88 for BPW91/ 6-311G(2 d,p), 3.33 for BPW91/6-31G(d) and 3.42 for BPW91/6-311G(d,p), with the number of bond length samples of 248, 248, 246, 248, 187, 248, 246, 246, 248, 248, 187, 151, 151 and 151, respectively.

A Comparison of Geometric Parameters from Pbe-Based Doubly Hybrid Density Functionals Pbe0-Dh, Pbe0-2, and Xdh-Pbe0

A Comparative Study of the Xdh-Pbe0 and Dsd-Pbepbe-D3bj Doubly Hybrid Density Functionals

Doubly Hybrid Density Functional Xdh-Pbe0 From A Parameter-Free Global Hybrid Model Pbe0

Systematic Comparison of Geometry Optimization on Inorganic Molecules

Analytic Derivatives for the XYG3 Type of Doubly Hybrid Density Functionals: Theory, Implementation, and Assessment

Exploring the Limits of the XYG3-Type Doubly Hybrid Approximations for the Main-Group Chemistry: the Xdh@b3lyp Model

Benchmarking Density Functionals on Structural Parameters of Small-/Medium-Sized Organic Molecules.

Benchmark Study of Density Functional Theory Methods in Geometry Optimization of Transition Metal-Dinitrogen Complexes

Assessment of Advanced Xdh@b3lyp Methods in Describing Various Potential Energy Curves Driven by Π-Π,ch/π,and SH/π Non-Bonded Interactions

High-Level Ab Initio Energy Divergences Between Theoretical Optimized and Experimental Geometries

Symmetry Dilemma of Doubly Hybrid Density Functionals for Equilibrium Molecular Property Calculations.

Construction of a Parameter-Free Doubly Hybrid Density Functional from Adiabatic Connection.

Beyond Energies: Geometry Predictions with the XYG3 Type of Doubly Hybrid Density Functionals.

xDH double hybrid functionals can be qualitatively incorrect for non-equilibrium geometries: Dipole moment inversion and barriers to radical-radical association using XYG3 and XYGJ-OS

The Extended Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof Functional With Improved Accuracy For Thermodynamic And Electronic Properties Of Molecular Systems

Performance of Several Density Functional Theory Methods on Describing Hydrogen-Bond Interactions

Doubly Hybrid Density Functionals That Correctly Describe Both Density and Energy for Atoms.

Double Hybrid Functionals And The Ii-System Bond Length Alternation Challenge: Rivaling Accuracy Of Post-Hf Methods

Recent Progress of the XYG3 Type of Doubly Hybrid Functionals: from Energy Calculations to Analytic Geometry Optimizations

A double-hybrid density functional based on good local physics with outstanding performance on the GMTKN55 database

A New Generation Density Functional XYG3