Doubly Hybrid Density Functionals That Correctly Describe Both Density and Energy for Atoms.

Neil Qiang Su,Zhenyu Zhu,Xin Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713047115
2018-01-01
Abstract:Significance It was commented that some modern density functional theory functionals may be giving the correct energies for the wrong reason and functionals that produce “right” energies from “wrong” densities fail twice. However, the route to the “heaven” of the “Jacob’s ladder” is incomplete in Medvedev et al. [Medvedev MG, et al. (2017) Science 355:49–52], as the authors did not provide any information on the top fifth-rung functionals. We fill the gap to show here that the XYG3 type of doubly hybrid density functionals (xDHs) can correctly describe both density and energy for the same atomic set used by Medvedev et al., such that electronic structure calculations for molecular sciences of the main group elements can be carried out reliably by using xDHs. Recently, it was argued [Medvedev MG, et al. (2017) Science 355:49–52] that the development of density functional approximations (DFAs) is “straying from the path toward the exact functional.” The exact functional should yield both exact energy and density for a system of interest; nevertheless, they found that many heavily fitted functionals for molecular energies actually lead to poor electron densities of atoms. They also observed a trend that, for the nonempirical and few-parameter functionals, densities can be improved as one climbs up the first four rungs of the Jacob’s ladder of DFAs. The XYG3 type of doubly hybrid functionals (xDHs) represents a less-empirical and fewer-parameter functional on the top fifth rung, in which both the Hartree–Fock-like exchange and the second-order perturbative (MP2-like) correlation are hybridized with the low rung functionals. Here, we show that xDHs can well describe both density and energy for the same atomic set of Medvedev et al., showing that the latter trend can well be extended to the top fifth rung.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?