Abstract:Capturing CO2 out of flue gases emitted from power plants is an efficient way to alleviate the greenhouse gas effect. The commonly used method to capture CO2 is to chemically absorb it with amine solutions. The mostly used are aqueous solutions and the aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) is an effective choice to absorb CO2 with high reaction rate. However, the regeneration energy consumption is too high to be applied into industry efficiently. The main reason is due to the high boiling point, thus the non-aqueous solvent is a good alternative. In this paper, experiment is carried out to investigate the substituteion of water by methanol as the boiling point of it is no more than 343 K. during the experiment, 30%wt MEA aqueous and non-aqueous solutions were studied to absorb CO2 and the pure CO2 gases and simulated gas mixture of 12% CO2 and 88% N2 were studied, respectively. The jacket reactor was used to control the reaction temperature and the jacket spiral cooling pipe was used to cool the outlet gases from the reactor and separate the evaporated solutions. The temperature of the cooling water is 20°C. With the gas flow meter, it is easy to control and record the gas mass flow. And the gas analyzer was used to analyze the component of the mixed outlet gas. Every reaction courses were repeated several times to validate the accuracy. After the compensation of temperature, zero and evaporation, the absorption results were achieved and the CO2 absorption rate along time was obtained and absorption capacities in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions were easily observed. The results show that when the gas is pure CO2, the reaction rates for MEA aqueous solution is higher than that of non-aqueous solution at first, however, the different gap is little. Then after about 15 min, the reaction rate for MEA non-aqueous solution becomes higher than that of aqueous one as its reaction rate decreases. And the absorption capacity of non-aqueous solution is almost 0.1 mol CO2/mol MEA higher than that of aqueous solution. For the mixed gases, the reaction process is much lower than that of the pure CO2 gas. The results show that during the reaction process, the reaction rate of CO2 absorbing in non-aqueous solution is higher than that of aqueous and the CO2 absorption capacity in non-aqueous solution is also larger than that of aqueous. Also, the reaction time for pure CO2 is about 50min and for mixed gas is about 140min. Hence, the non-aqueous solutions have better CO2 absorption performance than the aqueous ones. Also, regeneration experiments were performed and the results show that the temperature ranges of 60-70°C are suitable for the CO2 loaded MEA-methanol solutions. When the temperature is higher than 70°C, methanol is preferable to be evaporated than the CO2 to be regenerated. Thus, the suitable regeneration temperature for MEA-methanol solution is no more than 70°C, which can reduce a large amount of energy in CO2 regeneration process. However, the obvious disadvantage for the non-aqueous solution is that the evaporation of the solution (methanol)

Kinetics of carbon dioxide absorption into mixed aqueous solutions of MEA + [Bmim]BF4 using a double stirred cell

Absorption of Carbon Dioxide into Aqueous Blend of Monoethanolamine and 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Tetrafluoroborate

Deciphering the Transfer Mechanisms for CO2 Absorption into Binary Blended Solutions

Study on CO2 Absorption-Mineralization Characteristics of Mixed Amine Solution Coupled with CaO and Key Influencing Factors in Mineralization Process

Kinetics of absorption of CO2 into aqueous MEA solutions

Mass transfer and kinetics of CO 2 absorption into aqueous monoethanolamine/1-hydroxyethy-3-methyl imidazolium glycinate solution

A Rigorous Model for Absorption of Carbon Dioxide into Aqueous N-Methyldiethanolamine Solution

Experimental study on the absorption of CO 2 from flue gas by aqueous solutions of methyldiethanolamine + potassium glycinate in hollow fiber membrane contactor

Mechanism and Kinetics Study of CO2 Absorption into Blends of N-Methyldiethanolamine and 1-Hydroxyethyl-3-methylimidazolium Glycine Aqueous Solution

Density, Viscosity, and N2O Solubility of Aqueous Solutions of MEA, BmimBF4, and Their Mixtures from 293.15 to 333.15 K

CO2 Absorption Enhancement of Fluorinated Ionic Liquids on Nonaqueous Biphasic Absorbents: Experimental and Theoretical Study

Experiment Study on CO 2 Absorption and Desorption in the Non-Aqueous Blended Solutions of MEA and Methanol

Mechanism and Kinetic Study of Carbon Dioxide Absorption into a Methyldiethanolamine/1-Hydroxyethyl-3-methylimidazolium Lysine/Water System

Integrated CO 2 absorption-mineralization process by the MEA + MDEA system coupled with Ba(OH) 2 : Absorption kinetics and mechanisms

Mechanism study on CO2 capture by ionic liquids made from TFA blended with MEA and MDEA

Selection of Blended Solvents for CO2 Absorption from Coal-Fired Flue Gas. Part 1: Monoethanolamine (Mea)-Based Solvents

Absorption of Carbon Dioxide with Aqueous Blends of 2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and Sodium Glycinate.

Experiment of CO_2 Separation from Flue Gases by Membrane Gas Absorption

Influence of Absorbent Composition and Operating Parameters on CO2 Removal Efficiency Using Aqueous Blends of 1-Dimethylamino-2-propanol in Tray Column

Kinetics Study on Co2 Absorption with Aqueous Solutions of 1,4-Butanediamine, 2-(Diethylamino)-ethanol, and Their Mixtures

Investigation on kinetics of carbon dioxide absorption in aqueous solutions of monoethanolamine + 1, 3-diaminopropane