Abstract:Among four membrane distillation (MD) configurations, direct contact MD (DCMD) and vacuum MD (VMD) exhibit attractive characteristics from different perspectives and have great potential in treating reverse osmosis (RO) brine. Aiming at establishing a quick approach to predict the key output parameters associated with MD module performance and process efficiency, Aspen plus was employed to conduct systematic evaluation for both DCMD and VMD. Due to the lack of built-in MD operation models in Aspen Plus, one dimensional transport models were developed and complied as user customized units to simulate the hollow fiber-based DCMD and VMD modules. The corresponding programming was coded in FORTRAN language. The mathematical models for DCMD and VMD were verified by comparing the simulations results with the experimental and literature data, respectively.By incorporating the boundary-layer effect into the newly-established transport models, steady-state simulations of the respective DCMD and VMD flowsheets were carried out. The results showed that the DCMD presented much lower process efficiency than VMD in terms of permeation flux and specific energy consumption per kg distillate generated, even though it is considered as the simplest and most commonly employed configuration. With the same module specifications and operating conditions at equivalent energy cost, the VMD system demonstrated a minimal 2.5-fold higher average vapor flux (e.g., water recovery capacity) when compared to DCMD. The fundamental difference between the two configurations was revealed through MD mass- and heat-transfer analysis. Based on simulated temperature profiles, it was found that the VMD configuration presented a much higher driving force (transmembrane temperature difference) and negligible conductive heat loss to the membrane, which is a promising feature for achieving high thermal efficiency.

DCMD Flux Curve Characteristics of Cross-Flow Hollow Fiber Membrane

Spatial variations of DCMD performance for desalination through countercurrent hollow fiber modules

Effects of Thermal Efficiency in DCMD and the Preparation of Membranes with Low Thermal Conductivity

Analysis of DCMD-Based Hollow Fiber Membrane Heat Exchanger

Permeate Flux Curve Characteristics Analysis of Cross-Flow Vacuum Membrane Distillation

Modeling and optimization of hollow fiber DCMD module for desalination

Direct Contact Membrane Distillation Mechanism for High Concentration NaCl Solutions

3D-CFD simulation of hollow fiber direct contact membrane distillation module: Effect of module and fibers geometries on hydrodynamics, mass, and heat transfer

Membrane Fouling and Wetting in a DCMD Process for RO Brine Concentration

Analysis of Temperature and Concentration Polarizations for Performance Improvement in Direct Contact Membrane Distillation

Exergy Analysis of Direct Contact Membrane Distillation under Different Operating Temperatures

CFD simulation of heat and mass transport for water transfer through hydrophilic membrane in direct-contact membrane distillation process

Analysis on the structure of different hollow fiber membrane contactors

Comparison of Hollow Fiber Module Designs in Membrane Distillation Process Employed Lumen-Side and Shell-Side Feed

Enhancing the Permeate Flux Improvement of Direct Contact Membrane Distillation Modules with Inserted S-Ribs Carbon-Fiber Filaments

Characteristics analysis of cross flow vacuum membrane distillation process

Experimental Study of Ammonia Removal from Water by Modified Direct Contact Membrane Distillation

Performance and Fouling Mechanism of Direct Contact Membrane Distillation(dcmd) Treating Fermentation Wastewater with High Organic Concentrations

Novel coiled hollow fiber module for high-performance membrane distillation

Surface hydrophobicity based heat and mass transfer mechanism in membrane distillation

Evaluation of Hollow Fiber-Based Direct Contact and Vacuum Membrane Distillation Systems Using Aspen Process Simulation