Specific Gene Co-variation Acts Better Than Number of Concomitant Altered Genes in Predicting EGFR-TKI Efficacy in Non–small-cell Lung Cancer
Yan-Juan Zhu,Xin Qu,Dan-Dan Zhan,Hui-Hui Chen,Hai-Peng Li,Li-Rong Liu,Xian Chen,Yi-Hong Liu,Yong Li,Jian-Ping Bai,Sheng Ye,Hai-Bo Zhang,Yan-juan Zhu,Dan-dan Zhan,Hui-hui Chen,Hai-peng Li,Li-rong Liu,Yi-hong Liu,Jian-ping Bai,Hai-bo Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2020.09.003
IF: 4.84
2021-01-01
Clinical Lung Cancer
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>There occurs huge heterogeneity in clinical outcomes for epidermal growth factor receptor (<em>EGFR</em>) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). The purpose of this study was to indicate genetic bio-markers predicting primary resistance of EGFR-TKIs in these patients.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Patients and Methods</h3><p>Using a next generation sequencing panel with 168 cancer related genes, matched tumor biopsy and plasma samples before treatments from NSCLC patients were analyzed. Patients taking EGFR-TKIs were followed up with imaging examination. Correlation of co-alterative genes with progression free survival (PFS) were analyzed.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Of the 48 patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, 46(95.83%) had at least one genetic co-variant beyond <em>EGFR</em> mutation. Multivariate analysis indicated that <em>RB1</em>, <em>PIK3CA</em>, and <em>ERBB2</em> co-alterations, rather than number of co-alterative genes, were independently associated with poorer PFS. Grouping patients by specific gene status showed best LRχ<sup>2</sup>, Akaike information criterion, and Harrell's concordance index. Median PFS for patients in group A (less genetic co-variations and wild specific genes), group B (more genetic co-variations and wild specific genes), group C (less genetic co-variations and altered specific genes), and group D (more genetic co-variations and altered specific genes) were 10.4, 9.13 (<em>vs.</em> group A, p=0.3112), 6.33 (<em>vs.</em> group B, p=0.0465), and 3.90 (<em>vs.</em> group C, p=0.0309) months, respectively.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>This study revealed a high concomitant genetic alteration rate in <em>EGFR</em> mutated NSCLC patients. Specific gene variants were more important than number of altered genes in predicting poor PFS, and may help select patients needing new treatment strategies.</p>
oncology