Abstract:Introduction: Subsurface structure of the Moon, at a depth from a few meters to hundreds of meters, not only provides important information concerning significant questions about the geologic and thermal history of the Moon, but also is critical for quantifying potential resources for future lunar exploration and engineering constrains for human outposts. Recently, with a renewed interest in lunar exploration, a variety of remote sensing instruments, including the Earth-based Arecibo radar [1], the Kaguya lunar radar sounder (LRS) [2], the Chang-E 1 microwave radiometers [3], and the Mini-SARs onboard Chandrayaan-1 and Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) [4,5], have been used to investigate lunar subsurface structure. Preliminary observations have been used to study global and regional regolith thickness [3,6], and deep stratigraphic structure [2]. However, explanations of these data usually depend upon the employed geophysical models, and sometimes are even ambiguous. In addition, interpretations of these observations have to be validated by in situ measurement before confident conclusions can be extended globally. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is an important tool for probing the shallow subsurface in a variety of geologic settings [7]. In China’s Chang-E 3 lunar mission, a rover deployed GPR will be used to characterize near surface geology, structure and the dielectric properties of the Moon. In this study, we first discussed the scientific rationale for a lunar GPR and the main factors that affect a GPR performance. Then taking Sinus Iridum region as an example, radargrams are simulated using geometrical optics approach. Finally, the potential scientific return from GPR echoes is also discussed. Factors Affecting GPR Performance: An impulse GPR using a transmitted radar wave can delineate subsurface interfaces between materials with contrast of dielectric and/or structural properties. Penetration depth and range resolution are two major factors for designing a GPR for the Moon. The nominal penetration depth depends on the complex dielectric constant of the lunar material and GPR frequency, whereas the range resolution depends on the real part of the dielectric constant and the GPR bandwidth. Therefore, the dielectric property of the subsurface materials is a key parameter for the design of a lunar GPR. A recent estimation of the dielectric constant of the Moon shows that the real part varies from 2.5 to 3.4 and the loss tangent varies from 0.0036 to 0.028 [8]. Penetration depth of radar wave varies from 3 to 10 wavelengths over Maria, with a with a minimum located at Oceanus Procellarum and Mare Tranquillitatis, and that over highlands is about 20-25 wavelengths. A VHF and P band frequency can penetrate lunar subsurface from several to tens of meters. Taking the bandwidth of 100 MHz as an example, the range resolution in lunar subsurface varies globally from 0.8 to 0.95 m. Given the scientific objective and technique feasibility, a dual frequency GPR at 450 MHz and 60 MHz, with a nominal penetration depth roughly from 2 to 50 m for maria and 100 m for highlands, might be a better choice for Chang-E 3 rover. The range resolution in lunar subsurface varies from 20 cm over maria to that of 25 cm over highlands for a bandwidth of 400 MHz (for high frequency band), whereas from about 2 m to 2.5 m for a bandwidth of 40 MHz (for low frequency band). Preliminary Simulation Results: In this study, the geometrical optics approach is used to simulate GPR echo from lunar subsurface layers. Without loss of generality, lunar subsurface structure is represented by a multi-layer model, with the total number of layers n. Each layer is characterized by its thickness and complex dielectric constant. Then, the received GPR echo from the base of the m-the layer can be calculated as

Simulation for Ground Penetrating Radar (gpr) Study of the Subsurface Structure of the Moon

EXPLORATION SUBSURFACE STRUCTURE OF THE MOON: POTENTIAL SCIENTIFIC RETURN FROM A GROUND PENETRATING RADAR

The Application Research of Ground Penetrating Radar Technology to Lunar Exploration

Comparative analysis of reflection characteristics of lunar penetrating radar data using numerical simulations

Performance evaluation of lunar penetrating radar onboard the rover of CE-3 probe based on results from ground experiments

Structural Analysis of Lunar Subsurface with Chang׳E-3 Lunar Penetrating Radar

Lunar Penetrating Radar Onboard the Chang'E-3 Mission

Data Processing and Initial Results of Chang'E-3 Lunar Penetrating Radar

Pitfalls in gpr data interpretation: false reflectors detected in lunar radar cross sections by Chang'e-3

Simulation of Lunar Comprehensive Substructure with Fracture and Imaging of Later LPR Data from Chang'e-4 Mission.

Simulation of Lunar Comprehensive Substructure With Fracture and Imaging of Later LPR Data From Chang’e-4 Mission

High-resolution permittivity estimation of ground penetrating radar data by migration with isolated hyperbolic diffractions and local focusing analyses

A Study on Lunar Regolith Quantitative Random Model and Lunar Penetrating Radar Parameter Inversion.

Lunar Regolith Stratigraphy Analysis Based on the Simulation of Lunar Penetrating Radar Signals

Lunar Exploration Based on Ground-Based Radar: Current Research Progress and Future Prospects

Numerical Validation of Subsurface Dielectric Property Estimation Based on Full Waveform Inversion at Chang’E-4 Landing Site

High-Performance Numerical Simulation of Radar Wave Scattering Due to Topographic Roughness

Simulation of Radar Sounder Echo from Lunar Surface and Subsurface Structure

Pseudo-Spectral Time-Domain Method for Subsurface Imaging with the Lunar Regolith Penetrating Radar

Rover-Mounted Radar Observation of Discrete Layers Within the Top 4 Meters of Regolith at the Chang'E-3 Landing Site, the Moon

Properties Analysis of Lunar Regolith at Chang’E-4 Landing Site Based on 3D Velocity Spectrum of Lunar Penetrating Radar