Abstract:While we cannot directly measure the psychological preferences of individuals, and the moral, emotional, and cognitive tendencies of people from the past, we can use cultural artifacts as a window to the zeitgeist of societies in particular historical periods. At present, an increasing number of digitized texts spanning several centuries is available for a computerized analysis. In addition, developments form historical economics have enabled increasingly precise estimations of sociodemographic realities from the past. Crossing these datasets offer a powerful tool to test how the environment changes psychology and vice versa . However, designing the appropriate proxies of relevant psychological constructs is not trivial. The gold standard to measure psychological constructs in modern texts – Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) – has been validated by psychometric experimentation with modern participants. However, as a tool to investigate the psychology of the past, the LIWC is limited in two main aspects: (1) it does not cover the entire range of relevant psychological dimensions and (2) the meaning, spelling, and pragmatic use of certain words depend on the historical period from which the fiction work is sampled. These LIWC limitations make the design of custom tools inevitable. However, without psychometric validation, there is uncertainty regarding what exactly is being measured. To overcome these pitfalls, we suggest several internal and external validation procedures, to be conducted prior to diachronic analyses. First, the semantic adequacy of search terms in bags-of-words approaches should be verified by training semantic vector spaces with the historical text corpus using tools like word2vec. Second, we propose factor analyses to evaluate the internal consistency between distinct bag-of-words proxying the same underlying psychological construct. Third, these proxies can be externally validated using prior knowledge on the differences between genres or other literary dimensions. Finally, while LIWC is limited in the analysis of historical documents, it can be used as a sanity check for external validation of custom measures. This procedure allows a robust estimation of psychological constructs and how they change throughout history. Together with historical economics, it also increases our power in testing the relationship between environmental change and the expression of psychological traits from the past.

Cross-cultural dimensions of meaning in the evaluation of events in world history?: Perceptions of historical calamities and progress in cross-cultural data from thirty societies

Developing and Evaluating the Social Axioms Survey in Eleven Countries

Cross-Cultural Differences in a Global “Survey of World Views”

Contextual and Cultural Differences in Positive Thinking

Crisis, Culture, Leader and Interaction History: Contextual Effects on Unethical Prosocial Behavior

The World at 7:00: Comparing the Experience of Situations Across 20 Countries

Globalization and Folk Theory of Social Change: How Globalization Relates to Societal Perceptions about the Past and Future

Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures

How to Develop Reliable Instruments to Measure the Cultural Evolution of Preferences and Feelings in History?

Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies

Quantitative historical analysis uncovers a single dimension of complexity that structures global variation in human social organization

Coping and emotions of global higher education students to the Ukraine war worldwide

Cultural Differences in the Construal of Suffering and the COVID-19 Pandemic

Navigating polycrisis: long-run socio-cultural factors shape response to changing climate

Cultural Constraints in the Design of Pictographic Symbols

Exploring disaster ontologies from Chinese and Western perspectives: commonalities and nuances

Explaining Urban Social Disorder and Violence: An Empirical Study of Event Data from Asian and Sub-Saharan African Cities

Individual and Culture-Level Components of Survey Response Styles: A Multi-Level Analysis Using Cultural Models of Selfhood.

Does Perception Determine Knowledge? Evaluation of the Implementation of Historical Thinking as a Factor for Socio-Cultural Sustainability

Cultural contributions to adults' self-rated mental health problems and strengths: 7 culture clusters, 28 societies, 16 906 adults

Dimensions of wisdom perception across twelve countries on five continents