ELM control experiments in the KSTAR device

Jayhyun Kim,Youngmu Jeon,Weiwen Xiao,Siwoo Yoon,Jongkyu Park,Gunsu Yun,Joonwook Ahn,Hyunseok Kim,Hyunglyeol Yang,Hakkun Kim,Soohyeon Park,Jinhyun Jeong,MyungJin Jung,G. H. Choe,Wonha Ko,Sangil Lee,Y. U. Nam,Jungyo Bak,Kyudong Lee,Hoonkyun Na,Sanghee Hahn,Patrick H. Diamond,T. Rhee,J. M. Kwon,Steven Anthony Sabbagh,Yeonsang Park,Hyeon Park,Yongsu Na,Woongchae Kim,Jonggu Kwak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/52/11/114011
IF: 3.3
2012-01-01
Nuclear Fusion
Abstract:The fourth KSTAR campaign in 2011 concentrated on active edge-localized mode (ELM) control by various methods such as non-axisymmetric magnetic perturbations, supersonic molecular beam injection (SMBI), vertical jogs of the plasma column and edge electron heating. The segmented in-vessel control coil (IVCC) system is capable of applying n <= 2 perturbed field with different phasing among top, middle and bottom coils. Application of an n = 1 perturbed field showed a desirable ELM suppression result. Fast vertical jogs of the plasma column achieved ELM pace-making and ELMs locked to 50 Hz vertical jogs were observed with a high probability of phase locking. A newly installed SMBI system was used for ELM control and the state of mitigated ELMs was sustained by the optimized repetitive SMBI pulse for a few tens of ELM periods. A change in ELM behaviour was seen due to edge electron heating although the effect of ECH launch needs supplementary analyses. The ECEI images of suppressed/mitigated ELM states showed apparent differences when compared with natural ELMy states. Further analyses are ongoing to explain the observed ELM control results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?