Abstract:Biased competition theory suggests that stimuli matching the contents of visual working memory can always capture attention. However, the tests of this hypothesis failed to product consistent results. Some researches indicated that items matching the contents of visual working memory can automatically capture attention (i.e., memory-based attentional capture). Others argued that the contents of visual working memory are not necessary to capture attention. They can be rejected when they were irrelevant to the goal of the current task (i.e., memory-based attentional rejection). One of the remained questions is that whether or not the memory-based attentional capture effect is obligatory during the early deployments of visual attention, or in other words, whether or not the memory-based attentional rejection effect can be found during the early attentional deployments. <br> Present study conducted an ERP experiment to investigate the time course of memory-based attentional guidance. Participants performed a visual search task while concurrently maintaining an item in visual object working memory. The search task included one target and one distractor. In matching trials, the search distractor shared the same color with the memory item. In control trials, neither the search target nor the distractor matched the color of the memory item. Meantime, the proportion of matching trials (20%/50%/80%) was manipulated. Higher proportion of matching trials elicits higher level of cognitive control incentive. <br> Behavioural results showed search RTs were faster in matching trials than in control trials when the proportion of matching trials was set to be 50% and 80%, suggesting that items matching the contents of working memory can be rejected. However, no effect of trial type was found on search RTs when the proportion of matching trials was 20%. ERP results firstly revealed N2pc components at approximately 200~300 ms post-stimulus in all three proportion conditions (20%/50%/80%), suggesting the memory-based attentional capture effects. Furthermore, N2pc amplitudes were reduced when the proportion of matching trials increased from 50% to 80%. N2pc latencies were speeded with higher proportion of matching trials. Secondly, the positive difference waves corresponding to the inhibition of the memory-matching item were then observed after N2pc (since approximately 300 ms post-stimulus) in 50% and 80% conditions, suggesting the memory-based attentional rejection effects. Such positive difference waves were enhanced when the proportion of matching trials increased. <br> In sum, our results indicate the guidance effect of visual working memory on attention has two phases, i.e., the memory-based attentional capture on the early phase and the memory-based attentional rejection on the later phase. The early memory-based attentional capture effect is involuntary, though the effect-size and time course of it can be varied by the level of cognitive control incentive. The later memory-based attentional rejection effect is voluntary and more in evidence with higher cognitive control incentive.

The Neural Mechanisms of Percept–memory Comparison in Visual Working Memory

Tracking Stimulus Representation Across a 2-Back Visual Working Memory Task

Tracking the mismatch information in visual short term memory: an event-related potential study.

Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory

Overlapping neural representations for selection in attention and working memory

Comparing Neural Correlates of Memory Encoding and Maintenance for Foveal and Peripheral Stimuli

Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture

Dissociated Mechanisms of Extracting Perceptual Information into Visual Working Memory.

Frontal Theta Activity Supports Detecting Mismatched Information in Visual Working Memory

Electrophysiological evidence for memory-based attentional capture and memory-based attentional rejection effects

[Study on Sensitivity of Event-Related EEG Sychronization and Desychronization Visual Memory Load].

Task-irrelevant features in working memory alter current visual processing

Visual Working Memory Guides Spatial Attention: Evidence from alpha oscillations and sustained potentials

The Processing of Perceptual Similarity with Different Features or Spatial Relations As Revealed by P2/P300 Amplitude.

Working Memory Biases Early Object Discrimination and Parietal Activity During Attentional Selection

The Role of Middle Frontal Gyrus in Working Memory Retrieval by the Effect of Target Detection Tasks: a Simultaneous EEG-fMRI Study

Cross-cultural comparison of the neural correlates of true and false memory retrieval

Selective attention modulates feature accumulation speed during perception and memory retrieval

Behavioral and Functional MRI Study of Attention Shift in Human Verbal Working Memory.

Use of Minimal Working Memory in Visual Comparison: an Eye-Tracking Study.

The Temporal Dynamics of Visual Working Memory Guidance of Selective Attention.