Abstract:The limited capacity of visual working memory (VWM) requires an efficient information selection mechanism. However, an uneconomical object-based encoding manner of VWM has been consistently found in previous studies. That is, not only the target feature, but also the task-irrelevant features from the same object are extracted into VWM. Besides the totally task-irrelevant feature which is never useful throughout the whole task, there is another kind of “irrelevant feature” that is necessary initially but no longer useful for the left task, termed as key feature in Chen & Wyble (2015)’s Attribute Amnesia studies. Previous studies showed that despite participants could not explicitly report the key feature in a surprise memory test, they had some memory traces for this unreportable information that could still produce an inter-trial priming effect. The current study sought to investigate the status of memory representation of a key feature by directly comparing it with the memory representation of a totally irrelevant feature from the same object (which serves as a baseline). In a series of experiments, participants were asked to memorize one feature of a single object, and then performed a visual search task in which there was either one of the distractors matching the task-irrelevant feature or key feature of the memory item, or there was no match between the memory and search display. Surprisingly, the results convergingly showed that despite a reliable WM-driven attentional bias effect (i.e., longer search time in the match condition than the no-match neutral condition) was generated by a task-irrelevant feature of an object, there was no such an effect triggered by the key feature. These findings suggested that participants might tend to actively inhibit just used information (i.e., key feature), resulting in even weaker memory representation of such information as compared to that of completely task-irrelevant features.

Assessing the interaction between working memory and perception through time

Tracking Stimulus Representation Across a 2-Back Visual Working Memory Task

Delay-period Activity in Frontal, Parietal, and Occipital Cortex Tracks Noise and Biases in Visual Working Memory

Visual Working Memory Impairs Visual Detection: A Function of Working Memory Load or Sensory Load?

Maintenance of Bound or Independent Features in Visual Working Memory is Task-dependent

Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay

Serial Dependence in Timing at the Perceptual Level Being Modulated by Working Memory

The Neural Mechanisms of Percept–memory Comparison in Visual Working Memory

Neural dynamics of visual working memory representation during sensory distraction

Do we actively inhibit recently attended but no longer relevant information

The contribution of disengagement to temporal discriminability

Task-irrelevant features in working memory alter current visual processing

Limitations of Concurrently Representing Objects Within View and in Visual Working Memory.

Temporal dynamics and readout latency in perception and iconic memory

Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: evidence from suffix and strategy effects.

Momentary, Offset-Triggered Dual-Task Interference in Visual Working Memory

The Reactivation of working memory representations affects attentional guidance

Working memory contents enhance perception under stimulus-driven competition

A dynamic neural resource model bridges sensory and working memory

A matter of availability: sharper tuning for memorized than for perceived stimulus features