The flow cytometric PKH-26 assay for the determination of T-cell mediated cytotoxic activity.

Karin Fischer,A. Mackensen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00123-3

IF: 4.647

2003-10-01

Methods

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Tracking Stimulus Representation Across a 2-Back Visual Working Memory Task

Quan Wan,Ying Cai,Jason Samaha,Bradley R. Postle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190228

IF: 3.5

2020-01-01

Royal Society Open Science

Abstract:How does the neural representation of visual working memory content vary with behavioural priority? To address this, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while subjects performed a continuous-performance 2-back working memory task with oriented-grating stimuli. We tracked the transition of the neural representation of an item (n) from its initial encoding, to the status of ‘unprioritized memory item' (UMI), and back to ‘prioritized memory item', with multivariate inverted encoding modelling. Results showed that the representational format was remapped from its initially encoded format into a distinctive ‘opposite' representational format when it became a UMI and then mapped back into its initial format when subsequently prioritized in anticipation of its comparison with item n + 2. Thus, contrary to the default assumption that the activity representing an item in working memory might simply get weaker when it is deprioritized, it may be that a process of priority-based remapping helps to protect remembered information when it is not in the focus of attention.
Delay-period Activity in Frontal, Parietal, and Occipital Cortex Tracks Noise and Biases in Visual Working Memory

Qing Yu,Matthew F. Panichello,Ying Cai,Bradley R. Postle,Timothy J. Buschman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000854

2020-01-01

Abstract:Working memory is imprecise, and these imprecisions can be explained by the combined influences of random diffusive error and systematic drift toward a set of stable states (“attractors”). However, the neural correlates of diffusion and drift remain unknown. Here, we investigated how delay-period activity in frontal and parietal cortex, which is known to correlate with the decline in behavioral memory precision observed with increasing memory load, might relate to diffusion and drift. We analyzed data from an existing experiment in which subjects performed delayed recall for line orientation, at different loads, during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning. To quantify the influence of drift and diffusion, we modeled subjects’ behavior using a discrete attractor model and calculated within-subject correlation between frontal and parietal delay-period activity and whole-trial estimates of drift and diffusion. We found that although increases in frontal and parietal activity were associated with increases in both diffusion and drift, diffusion explained the most variance in frontal and parietal delay-period activity. In comparison, a subsequent whole-brain regression analysis showed that drift, rather than diffusion, explained the most variance in delay-period activity in lateral occipital cortex. These results are consistent with a model of the differential recruitment of general frontoparietal mechanisms in response to diffusive noise and of stimulus-specific biases in occipital cortex.
Asymmetric Interaction Effects of Information with Varying Priorities in Visual Working Memory

Jing Ni,Jiayi Fu,Ruotong Wang,Can Yang,Ying Cai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5012309

2024-01-01

Abstract:Visual working memory (VWM) is the ability to temporarily maintain and manipulate visual information, with individuals adjusting the priority of information processing based on task demands. However, the nature of the interactions between information of varying priorities in VWM remains debated, which is the focus of the current study. In Experiment 1, participants performed a delayed recall task for colors under different loads of prioritized memory items (PMIs) and unprioritized memory items (UMIs). The results indicated that the recall for PMIs deteriorated as the load of UMIs increased, and vice versa. More importantly, recall for UMIs was more significantly affected by the load of PMIs, indicating an asymmetric interaction pattern between PMIs and UMIs. Experiments 2 and 3 examined whether such an interaction pattern was influenced by the presentation order of PMIs and UMIs. We reversed and randomized the presentation sequence and replicated the findings from Experiment 1. Experiments 4 and 5 further validated these findings in delayed recall tasks for orientations and locations, confirming that the asymmetric interaction effects were consistent across different stimulus types. Moreover, Experiments 6 and 7 tested the cognitive mechanism underlying this pattern. We introduced an interference task during the delay phase and a test condition without recall of PMIs, revealing that the sustained attention to PMIs and the prioritized retrieval of PMIs were responsible for the observed asymmetry interaction pattern. Overall, this study enhances our understanding of how information with different priorities interacts during VWM and offers valuable insights for future studies.
Visual Working Memory Impairs Visual Detection: A Function of Working Memory Load or Sensory Load?

Yang Guo,Jiawen Liang,Nailang Yao,Mowei Shen,Zaifeng Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000965

2021-01-01

Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance

Abstract:Researchers have explored the influence of visual working memory (VWM) load on visual perception in the past decade. One of their key findings is that a high VWM load leads to reduced visual detection sensitivity to incoming visual stimuli. However, recent studies imply that persistent sensory processing continues after the memory array is offset. It is possible that the impaired visual detection is due to the sensory load of the residual sensory processing of the memory array (sensory load account) rather than the working memory load of the VWM task (VWM load account). We performed four experiments to examine the impacts on visual detection. Experiment 1 manipulated the retention time of the memory array while keeping the VWM load constant, revealing reduced visual detection along with retention time. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated the VWM load while maintaining a constant sensory load, and visual detection was not affected. Experiment 4 affirmed that the findings in Experiments 1-3 were reliable. Together, the results of the current study suggest that the residual sensory load, rather than the VWM load of the VWM task, impairs visual detection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Maintenance of Bound or Independent Features in Visual Working Memory is Task-dependent

Ruoyi Cao,Yoni Pertzov,Zaifeng Gao,Mowei Shen,Leon Y. Deouell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.12.439333

2024-01-01

Abstract:Over the last decade, seemingly conflicting results were obtained regarding the question of whether features of an object are stored separately, or bound together, in visual working memory. Many of these studies are based on an implicit assumption about a default, or fixed, mode of working memory storage. In contrast, here we asked whether the anticipated memory probes used in a given experiment might determine the format in which information is maintained in working memory, consistent with its task-oriented function. In order to test this flexible maintenance hypothesis, we recorded EEG while subjects performed a delayed-match-to-sample task with different requirements and load. In Experiment 1, by contrasting conditions with and without the requirement of maintaining bound features, we found significant differences in EEG signals recorded in central-parietal channels while controlling for differences in visual stimulation. Such difference was confirmed by multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). Moreover, behavior results, topographical distributions and cross-contrast MVPA decoding jointly suggested that this effect is not the same as task load effect. These results were confirmed in Experiment 2 with an independent group of subjects with the same paradigm, providing reliable evidence that the format of object maintenance in visual working memory could be flexibly shaped by the current task.
Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay

Alessandra S Souza,Klaus Oberauer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0652-z

Abstract:Is forgetting from working memory (WM) better explained by decay or interference? The answer to this question is the topic of an ongoing debate. Recently, a number of studies showed that performance in tests of visual WM declines with an increasing unfilled retention interval. This finding was interpreted as revealing decay. Alternatively, it can be explained by interference theories as an effect of temporal distinctiveness. According to decay theories, forgetting depends on the absolute time elapsed since the event to be retrieved. In contrast, temporal distinctiveness theories predict that memory depends on relative time, that is, the time since the to-be-retrieved event relative to the time since other, potentially interfering events. In the present study, we contrasted the effects of absolute time and relative time on forgetting from visual WM, using a continuous color recall task. To this end, we varied the retention interval and the inter-trial interval. The error in reporting the target color was a function of the ratio of the retention interval to the inter-trial interval, as predicted by temporal distinctiveness theories. Mixture modeling revealed that lower temporal distinctiveness produced a lower probability of reporting the target, but no changes in its precision in memory. These data challenge the role of decay in accounting for performance in tests of visual WM, and show that the relative spacing of events in time determines the degree of interference.
Serial Dependence in Timing at the Perceptual Level Being Modulated by Working Memory

Shuai Chen,Tianhe Wang,Yan Bao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.11.516083

IF: 1.559

2023-01-01

PsyCh Journal

Abstract:Recent experiences bias the perception of following stimuli, as has been verified in various kinds of experiments in visual perception. This phenomenon, known as serial dependence, may reflect mechanisms to maintain perceptual stability. In the current study, we examined several key properties of serial dependence in temporal perception. Firstly, we examined the source of serial dependence effect in temporal perception. We found that perception without motor reproduction is sufficient to induce the sequential effect; the motor reproduction caused a stronger effect and it is achieved by biasing the perception of the future target duration rather than directly influences the subsequent movement. Secondly, we ask how the working memory influences serial dependence in the in a temporal reproduction task. By varying the delay time between standard duration and the reproduction, we showed that the strength of serial dependence enhanced as the delay increased. Those features of serial dependence are consistent with what has been observed in the visual perceptual tasks, for example, orientation perception or location perception. The similarities between the visual and the timing tasks may suggest a similar neural coding mechanism of magnitude between the visual stimuli and the duration. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
The Neural Mechanisms of Percept–memory Comparison in Visual Working Memory

Jun Yin,Zaifeng Gao,Xinyi Jin,Xiaowei Ding,Junying Liang,Mowei Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.023

IF: 3.111

2012-01-01

Biological Psychology

Abstract:Researchers have revealed that comparing the perceptual input with the representations stored in visual working memory initiates a rapid attention-shift, which is predominantly triggered by the relevant-feature change. The comprehension of the change contents further necessitates a follow-up comparison that contrasts all the object features regardless of the task relevancy. However, whether such a distinct stage exists and how the process is carried on need further verification. We explored this issue by investigating the underlying neural mechanisms of the percept-memory comparison. By recording EEG, we found that both the task-relevant and -irrelevant feature changes elicited significantly more negative anterior N2 waves (230-340ms) rooting in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and meanwhile activated the frontal theta (5-8Hz, 250-550ms). These results suggest that a distinct comparison stage does exist, which is supported by the anterior N2, ACC and frontal theta.
Neural dynamics of visual working memory representation during sensory distraction

Jonas Karolis Degutis,Simon Weber,Joram Soch,John-Dylan Haynes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.12.589170

2024-05-23

Abstract:Recent studies have provided evidence for the concurrent encoding of sensory percepts and visual working memory contents (VWM) across visual areas; however, it has remained unclear how these two types of representations are concurrently present. Here, we reanalyzed an open-access fMRI dataset where participants memorized a sensory stimulus while simultaneously being presented with sensory distractors. First, we found that the VWM code in several visual regions did not generalize well between different time points, suggesting a dynamic code. A more detailed analysis revealed that this was due to shifts in coding spaces across time. Second, we collapsed neural signals across time to assess the degree of interference between VWM contents and sensory distractors, specifically by testing the alignment of their encoding spaces. We find that VWM and feature-matching sensory distractors are encoded in separable coding spaces. Together, these results indicate a role of dynamic coding and temporally stable coding spaces in helping multiplex perception and VWM within visual areas.

Neuroscience
Do we actively inhibit recently attended but no longer relevant information

Yingtao Fu,Jiahan Yu,Rende Shui,Mowei Shen,Hui Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.200c

2019-01-01

Journal of Vision

Abstract:The limited capacity of visual working memory (VWM) requires an efficient information selection mechanism. However, an uneconomical object-based encoding manner of VWM has been consistently found in previous studies. That is, not only the target feature, but also the task-irrelevant features from the same object are extracted into VWM. Besides the totally task-irrelevant feature which is never useful throughout the whole task, there is another kind of “irrelevant feature” that is necessary initially but no longer useful for the left task, termed as key feature in Chen & Wyble (2015)’s Attribute Amnesia studies. Previous studies showed that despite participants could not explicitly report the key feature in a surprise memory test, they had some memory traces for this unreportable information that could still produce an inter-trial priming effect. The current study sought to investigate the status of memory representation of a key feature by directly comparing it with the memory representation of a totally irrelevant feature from the same object (which serves as a baseline). In a series of experiments, participants were asked to memorize one feature of a single object, and then performed a visual search task in which there was either one of the distractors matching the task-irrelevant feature or key feature of the memory item, or there was no match between the memory and search display. Surprisingly, the results convergingly showed that despite a reliable WM-driven attentional bias effect (i.e., longer search time in the match condition than the no-match neutral condition) was generated by a task-irrelevant feature of an object, there was no such an effect triggered by the key feature. These findings suggested that participants might tend to actively inhibit just used information (i.e., key feature), resulting in even weaker memory representation of such information as compared to that of completely task-irrelevant features.
Does Visual Working Memory Work As a Few Fixed Slots?

Jie Li,Na Shao,Haokui Xu,Rende Shui,Mowei Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.773522

IF: 2.138

2013-01-01

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract:The present study investigated whether visual working memory (VWM) functions as a few (about 3 ∼ 4) fixed slots by examining how the distribution of VWM is adjusted. Adopting a change-detection paradigm, we required subjects to memorize four items, one of which was prioritized. If VWM functions as 3 ∼ 4 slots, allocating multiple slots to the prioritized item would leave no slot for some other items; consequently no information would be stored for them, leading to a substantial decrease in change-detection performance no matter whether small or large changes occurred. The result showed that small changes on the unfavoured items were detected less accurately, indicating that more VWM was allocated to the favoured item. Yet meanwhile large changes that occurred on those unfavoured items could still be detected as well as those on the favoured one, indicating that each of them was still stored to some extent rather than completely discarded. The results suggested that VWM may not work as 3 ∼ 4 fixed slots. Possible mechanisms were discussed based on the present results, including a modified slot model with more available slots, a continuous resource model, and a hierarchical model that assumes storage of ensemble information in addition to the information of individual items.
The contribution of disengagement to temporal discriminability

Zach Shipstead,Ashley Nespodzany

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1399143

Memory

Abstract:The present study examines the idea that time-based forgetting of outdated information can lead to better memory of currently relevant information. This was done using the visual arrays task, along with a between-subjects manipulation of both the retention interval (1 s vs. 4 s) and the time between two trials (1 s vs. 4 s). Consistent with prior work [Shipstead, Z., & Engle, R. W. (2013). Interference within the focus of attention: Working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 277-289; Experiment 1], longer retention intervals did not lead to diminished memory of currently relevant information. However, we did find that longer periods of time between two trials improved memory for currently relevant information. This replicates findings that indicate proactive interference affects visual arrays performance and extends previous findings to show that reduction of proactive interference can occur in a time-dependent manner.
Task-irrelevant features in working memory alter current visual processing

Hongqiao Shi,Qiqi Zhang,Jieyudong Zhou,Yue Ding,Yonghui Wang,Ya Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.29.620777

2024-10-29

Abstract:Higher-level cognition depends on visual working memory (VWM), the ability of our brain to maintain and manipulate internal representations of images that are no longer presented to us. An important question in this field is whether VWM is represented in a sensory or nonsensory manner. Progress has been made in understanding the features to be remembered, but the representational nature of the memory-irrelevant features is unclear. Here, we used a dual-task paradigm to investigate how and when the memory-irrelevant features interact with the concurrent visual information. In a series of experiments, participants were asked to perform a visual search task (Experiment 1) or a perceptual discrimination task (Experiments 2 and 3) involving a memory irrelevant feature while simultaneously holding the other feature for later retrieval. Experiment 1 showed that VWM biases the allocation of attention to color matching to the memory-irrelevant color. More importantly, the degree of VWM-biased attention decreased monotonically with decreasing feature similarity, and this behavioral monotonic gradient profile resembled the tuning curve of feature-selective neurons in the early visual cortex. Experiment 2 revealed that irrelevant features biased ongoing perception, as indicated by the shifted discrimination threshold. Experiment 3 further demonstrated that VWM-biased perception occurs only at short delays but not at prolonged delays. Our results suggest that the memory-irrelevant feature is represented as a sensory analog for a limited period of time in the visual areas where it was initially processed. Our results extend sensory recruitment theory to memory-irrelevant features in VWM.

Neuroscience
Temporal dynamics and readout latency in perception and iconic memory

Karla Matić,Issam Tafech,Peter König,John-Dylan Haynes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.07.616988

2024-10-10

Abstract:Following the offset of complex visual stimuli, rich stimulus information remains briefly available to the observer, reflecting a rapidly decaying iconic memory trace. Traditionally, iconic memory decay is assumed to begin with stimulus offset. Instead, here we found that available information begins decaying already when cues are presented in the final stage of stimulus presentation. Using closely spaced ('micro-timed') readout cues and a theoretical model of information availability, we observed that a cue has to be presented around 10-30 milliseconds before stimulus offset in order to access the full sensory information. We suggest that this does not reflect an early loss in sensory encoding, but instead it is a consequence of a latency in the processing of the cue which postpones the readout of the sensory representation by 10-30 milliseconds. Our analysis also shows that spatial proximity of items in complex arrays impacts sensory representation during both perceptual encoding and initial memory decay. Overall, these results provide a theoretical and empirical characterization of the readout from visual representations, and offer a detailed insight into the transition from perception into iconic memory.

Neuroscience
The Reactivation of working memory representations affects attentional guidance

Xiaowei Che,Haomin Lian,Feiyan Zhang,Shouxin Li,Yuanjie Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14514

2024-01-08

Psychophysiology

Abstract:Recent studies have suggested that the neural activity that supported working memory (WM) storage is dynamic over time and this dynamic storage decides memory performance. Does the temporal dynamic of the WM representation also affect visual search, and how does it interact with distractor suppression over time? To address these issues, we tracked the time course of the reactivation of WM representations during visual search by analyzing the electroencephalogram (EEG) and event‐related optical signals (EROS) in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively, and investigated the interaction between the representation reactivation and distractor suppression in Experiment 3. Participants had to maintain a color in WM under high‐ or low‐precision requirement and perform a subsequent search task. The reactivation of WM representations was defined by the above‐chance decoding accuracy. The EEG results showed that compared with the low‐precision requirement, WM‐matching distractors captured more attention and the WM representation were reactivated more frequently under high‐precision requirement. The EROS results showed that compared with the low‐precision requirement, the increased activity in occipital cortex in the WM‐matching versus WM‐mismatching conditions was observed at 224 ms during visual search under high‐precision requirement. Regression analysis showed that the representation reactivation during visual search directly predicted the behavioral WM‐based attentional capture effect, while the representation reactivation before visual search impacted the WM‐based attentional capture effect through the mediation of distractor suppression during visual search. These results suggest that the reactivation of WM representations and distractor suppression collectively determine WM‐based attentional capture.

psychology, experimental,physiology,neurosciences, biological
Working memory contents enhance perception under stimulus-driven competition

Suk Won Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0460-8

2014-09-06

Abstract:It is well known that attention is biased toward a stimulus matching working memory contents. However, it has been debated at which processing stage this memory-driven attentional bias takes place. While some studies show that memory-driven attention affects the early, perceptual stage of information processing, others argue that the finding showing such an effect is the result of working memory contents reducing uncertainty regarding the location of a target stimulus, without affecting the perception of the target. The present study tested whether a previous finding showing the perceptual effect of memory-driven attention is solely due to reduced target location uncertainty. We found that attentional bias by working memory contents affected the perception of a target stimulus, especially when multiple stimuli were present, competing against each other. This perceptual effect was not due to reduced target location uncertainty because the target location was always indicated by a response cue. Similar results were found regardless of whether working memory contents predicted the target location or not. These findings suggest that automatic, involuntary orienting of attention by working memory contents affects perception by resolving stimulus-driven competition.

psychology, experimental
A dynamic neural resource model bridges sensory and working memory

Ivan Tomić,Paul M. Bays

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.27.534406

2024-02-05

Abstract:Probing memory of a complex visual image within a few hundred milliseconds after its disappearance reveals significantly greater fidelity of recall than if the probe is delayed by as little as a second. Classically interpreted, the former taps into a detailed but rapidly decaying visual sensory or “iconic” memory (IM), while the latter relies on capacity-limited but comparatively stable visual working memory (VWM). While iconic decay and VWM capacity have been extensively studied independently, currently no single framework quantitatively accounts for the dynamics of memory fidelity over these timescales. Here we extend a stationary neural population model of VWM with a temporal dimension, incorporating rapid sensory-driven accumulation of activity encoding each visual feature in memory, and a slower accumulation of internal error that causes memorized features to randomly drift over time. Instead of facilitating read-out from an independent sensory store, an early cue benefits recall by lifting the effective limit on VWM signal strength imposed when multiple items compete for representation, allowing memory for the cued item to be supplemented with information from the decaying sensory trace. Empirical measurements of human recall dynamics validate these predictions while excluding alternative model architectures. A key conclusion is that differences in capacity classically thought to distinguish IM and VWM are in fact contingent upon a single resource-limited WM store.

Neuroscience
A matter of availability: sharper tuning for memorized than for perceived stimulus features

Samson Chota,Surya Gayet,J Leon Kenemans,Christian N L Olivers,Stefan Van der Stigchel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad064

2023-06-08

Abstract:Our visual environment is relatively stable over time. An optimized visual system could capitalize on this by devoting less representational resources to objects that are physically present. The vividness of subjective experience, however, suggests that externally available (perceived) information is more strongly represented in neural signals than memorized information. To distinguish between these opposing predictions, we use EEG multivariate pattern analysis to quantify the representational strength of task-relevant features in anticipation of a change-detection task. Perceptual availability was manipulated between experimental blocks by either keeping the stimulus available on the screen during a 2-s delay period (perception) or removing it shortly after its initial presentation (memory). We find that task-relevant (attended) memorized features are more strongly represented than irrelevant (unattended) features. More importantly, we find that task-relevant features evoke significantly weaker representations when they are perceptually available compared with when they are unavailable. These findings demonstrate that, contrary to what subjective experience suggests, vividly perceived stimuli elicit weaker neural representations (in terms of detectable multivariate information) than the same stimuli maintained in visual working memory. We hypothesize that an efficient visual system spends little of its limited resources on the internal representation of information that is externally available anyway.
The effect of working memory maintenance on long-term memory

Joshua K. Hartshorne,Tal Makovski

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00908-6

2019-05-01

Abstract:Initially inspired by the Atkinson and Shiffrin model, researchers have spent a half century investigating whether actively maintaining an item in working memory (WM) leads to improved subsequent long-term memory (LTM). Empirical results have been inconsistent, and thus the answer to the question remains unclear. We present evidence from 13 new experiments as well as a meta-analysis of 61 published experiments. Both the new experiments and meta-analysis show clear evidence that increased WM maintenance of a stimulus leads to superior recognition for that stimulus in subsequent LTM tests. This effect appears robust across a variety of experimental design parameters, suggesting that the variability in prior results in the literature is probably due to low power and random chance. The results support theories on which there is a close link between WM and LTM mechanisms, while challenging claims that this relationship is specific to verbal memory and evolved to support language acquisition.

psychology, experimental

The flow cytometric PKH-26 assay for the determination of T-cell mediated cytotoxic activity.

Tracking Stimulus Representation Across a 2-Back Visual Working Memory Task

Delay-period Activity in Frontal, Parietal, and Occipital Cortex Tracks Noise and Biases in Visual Working Memory

Asymmetric Interaction Effects of Information with Varying Priorities in Visual Working Memory

Visual Working Memory Impairs Visual Detection: A Function of Working Memory Load or Sensory Load?

Maintenance of Bound or Independent Features in Visual Working Memory is Task-dependent

Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay

Serial Dependence in Timing at the Perceptual Level Being Modulated by Working Memory

The Neural Mechanisms of Percept–memory Comparison in Visual Working Memory

Neural dynamics of visual working memory representation during sensory distraction

Do we actively inhibit recently attended but no longer relevant information

Does Visual Working Memory Work As a Few Fixed Slots?

The contribution of disengagement to temporal discriminability

Task-irrelevant features in working memory alter current visual processing

Temporal dynamics and readout latency in perception and iconic memory

The Reactivation of working memory representations affects attentional guidance

Working memory contents enhance perception under stimulus-driven competition

A dynamic neural resource model bridges sensory and working memory

A matter of availability: sharper tuning for memorized than for perceived stimulus features

The effect of working memory maintenance on long-term memory