Improved identification of 56 pathogenic Acinetobacter strains isolated from clinical cases

Lei Han,XuYan Zhang,Shaoshan Han,Andrew J. McCarron,John Edmund Moore,Cherie B. Millar,Jiru Xu
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To identify the species of Acinetobacter isolates collected from clinical cases and compare the accuracy between the methods of 44°C growth test and molecular ways including specific-PCR amplification and 16S rRNA sequencing in identification of Acinetobacter baumannii. Methods: Fifty-six Acinetobacter clinical isolates were collected from hospitals and cultured in TSB at 44°C. DNAs of these 56 isolates were extracted and PCR was performed using two sets of specific-primers. 16S rRNA was then sequenced by universal primers to identify the species of these Acinetobacter strains. Results: Seventeen out of 56 clinical strains could grow at 44°C, in which, however, eight and three isolates were confirmed as A. bacumannii and genomic sp. 13TU respectively via specific-primer PCR. A total of 9 species were discovered out of 56 Acinetobacter strains through 16S rRNA sequencing, the standard method in identifying bacteria, and the results obtained for A. baumannii and A. genomicsp. 13TU were the same as those obtained by specific-primer PCR. Conclusion: The molecular methods such as specific-primer PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing are much more reliable in identifying A. baumannii. Specific-primer PCR is especially recommended in confirming A. baumannii for its accuracy and high efficiency.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?