Hemodynamic Effects of Furosemide on Renal Perfusion As Evaluated by ASL-MRI.

Jing Wang,Yudong Zhang,Xuedong Yang,Xiaoying Wang,Jue Zhang,Jing Fang,Xuexiang Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.04.021
IF: 5.482
2012-01-01
Academic Radiology
Abstract:Figure 3: the mean and individual cortical RBF preand post-furosemide administration. Figure 5: the mean and individual global RBF preand post-furosemide administration. Figure 4: the mean and individual medullar RBF preand post-furosemide administration. Figure 2: representative renal ASL images obtained in a single volunteer (a) three magnitude images with global inversion and, (b) corresponding magnitude images with section-selective inversion; (c) one of M0 images in the same coronal section; (d) delta M map from the averaged magnitude images and, (e) corresponding RBF map cover the entire length of the kidney. Results The ASL images used for RBF evaluation revealed enough spatial information of the kidney, in which renal cortex and medulla were easily recognized. Fig. 2 revealed a representative baseline ASL image obtained in a single subject at 3T. The baseline RBF were estimated as 386.04±76.67 ml/100g/min in renal cortex, 96.47±23.97 ml/100g/min in medulla and 248.66±51.75 ml/100g/min for the whole kidney (P 0.05). Post-injection ASL scans showed the cortical RBF in the total subjects increased from 386.04±76.67 to 412.06 ± 90.28 ml/100g/min (P=0.15). The medullar RBF in the total subjects decreased from 96.47 ± 23.97 ml/100g/min at baseline to 84.47 ± 24.40 ml/100g/min (P=0.01). For the global kidney, the RBF in the total subjects was changed from 248.66±51.75 to 252.08 ± 47.55 ml/100g/min (P=0.74). The mean and inter-subject RBF deviation pre and post furosemide administration were shown in fig. 3-5. It revealed that furosemide increased cortical RBF with a range of 2.57-53.24% in six subjects (3 males, 3 females), while decreased cortical RBF with a range of 2.69 -15.89% in the other five subjects. Medullar RBF was decreased by 7.48-30.40% in nine subjects (4 males, 5 females), while increased by 12.51-14.40% in two male subjects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?