Infectious virus in exhaled breath of symptomatic seasonal influenza cases from a college community
Jing Yan,Michael Grantham,Jovan Pantelic,P. Jacob Bueno de Mesquita,Barbara Albert,Fengjie Liu,Sheryl Ehrman,Donald K. Milton,Walt Adamson,Blanca Beato-Arribas,Werner Bischoff,William Booth,Simon Cauchemez,Sheryl Ehrman,Joanne Enstone,Neil Ferguson,John Forni,Anthony Gilbert,Michael Grantham,Lisa Grohskopf,Andrew Hayward,Michael Hewitt,Ashley Kang,Ben Killingley,Robert Lambkin-Williams,Alex Mann,Donald Milton,Jonathan Nguyen-Van-Tam,Catherine Noakes,John Oxford,Massimo Palmarini,Jovan Pantelic,Jennifer Wang,Allan Bennett,Ben Cowling,Arnold Monto,Raymond Tellier,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716561115
IF: 11.1
2018-01-18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance Lack of human data on influenza virus aerosol shedding fuels debate over the importance of airborne transmission. We provide overwhelming evidence that humans generate infectious aerosols and quantitative data to improve mathematical models of transmission and public health interventions. We show that sneezing is rare and not important for—and that coughing is not required for—influenza virus aerosolization. Our findings, that upper and lower airway infection are independent and that fine-particle exhaled aerosols reflect infection in the lung, opened a pathway for a deeper understanding of the human biology of influenza infection and transmission. Our observation of an association between repeated vaccination and increased viral aerosol generation demonstrated the power of our method, but needs confirmation.