Abstract:Objective To evaluate the correlation of quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) based on a certain pharmacokinetic modeling with histopathology in human breast cancer.Methods Sixty-one patients with breast cancer were enrolled from June 2015 to April 2016,All received DCE-MRI check and were confirmed by pathology in one week.The following quantitative parameters:volume transfer constant (Ktrans),rate constant (Kep) and the plasma fraction(Vp) and semi-quantitative parameters:time to peak(TFP),max concentration (MAX Cone),area under curve(AUC) were calculated;Cases were divided into three groups including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) group、non-special invasive carcinoma group and special carcinoma group according to histopathology result.The difference of these parameters between different pathology types of breast cancer were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann -Whitney U test.Cases were assigned to one of two groups according to the lymph node status (negative group vs.positive group),histologic grade (non-high group including grades 1 and 2 vs.high group including grade 3),Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the difference of these parameters between the two groups.Results 8 cases were diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ group,48 cases were non-special invasive carcinoma group,and 5 cases were special carcinoma group by pathology,The Ktrans Max、Kep Max、Kep Mean were lower in ductal carcinoma in situ group than those in special carcinoma group,and the Ktrans Max、Kep Mean、MAX Conc Max were lower in non-special invasive carcinoma group than those in special carcinoma group,all the difference is statistically different(P ＜ 0.05),while the other parameters show no statistical difference between the two groups.There were 34 cases of non-high group and 12 cases of high group according to histologic grade in non-special invasive carcinoma.37 cases were assigned to negative group and 24 cases were assigned to positive group by the lymph node status of the pathological result.All the quantitative,semi-quantitative parameters show no statistical difference between the non-high group and high group according to histologic grade,The difference of all the quantitative 、semi-quantitative parameters between negative group and positive group by the lymph node status of the pathological result show no statistical difference either.Conclusion Some quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters based on DCE-MRI were valuable in differentiating special carcinoma from ductal carcinoma in situ and non-special invasive carcinoma in human breast cancer.

Dynamic MRI-derived parameters for hot and cold spots: correlation with breast cancer histopathology.

The use of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in differentiating between benign and malignant breast tumors and predicting the histologic grade for breast cancer patients

Dynamic Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Pretreatment Prediction of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Parameters of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI as Imaging Markers for Angiogenesis and Proliferation in Human Breast Cancer

Correlation Between the Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Features and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Mri of Gastric Cancer: Correlations of the Pharmacokinetic Parameters with Histological Type, Lauren Classification, and Angiogenesis

Predictive Ability of DWI/ADC and DCE-MRI Kinetic Parameters in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions and in Building a Prediction Model.

Heterogeneity in Intratumoral Regions with Rapid Gadolinium Washout Correlates with Estrogen Receptor Status and Nodal Metastasis

Association Between Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Imaging Features and WHO Histopathological Grade in Patients with Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer.

The utility of ultrafast MRI and conventional DCE-MRI for predicting histologic aggressiveness in patients with breast cancer

Correlative Study of the Parameters of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Angiogenesis in Breast Lesions

Comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prediction of prognostic factors and molecular subtypes in patients with breast cancer

Radiogenomic analysis of breast cancer: Dynamic contrast enhanced - Magnetic resonance imaging based features are associated with molecular subtypes

Association between quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI and molecular subtypes of breast cancer

Heterogeneity Of Tumor And Its Surrounding Stroma On Dce-Mri And Diffusion Weighted Imaging In Predicting Histological Grade And Lymph Node Status Of Breast Cancer

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Perfusion Parameters Are Imaging Biomarkers for Angiogenesis in Lung Cancer

The Correlation of Quantitative and Semi-Quantitative Parameters Obtained from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Histopathology in Human Breast Cancer

Correlation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging with Prognostic Factors and Subtypes of Breast Cancers.

On the Potential Use of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI Parameters As Radiomic Features of Cervical Cancer.

Correlation of Dynamic MR Features with Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer

Use of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Differentiation of Breast Tumors