Abstract:Objective To evaluate the correlation of quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) based on a certain pharmacokinetic modeling with histopathology in human breast cancer.Methods Sixty-one patients with breast cancer were enrolled from June 2015 to April 2016,All received DCE-MRI check and were confirmed by pathology in one week.The following quantitative parameters:volume transfer constant (Ktrans),rate constant (Kep) and the plasma fraction(Vp) and semi-quantitative parameters:time to peak(TFP),max concentration (MAX Cone),area under curve(AUC) were calculated;Cases were divided into three groups including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) group、non-special invasive carcinoma group and special carcinoma group according to histopathology result.The difference of these parameters between different pathology types of breast cancer were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann -Whitney U test.Cases were assigned to one of two groups according to the lymph node status (negative group vs.positive group),histologic grade (non-high group including grades 1 and 2 vs.high group including grade 3),Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the difference of these parameters between the two groups.Results 8 cases were diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ group,48 cases were non-special invasive carcinoma group,and 5 cases were special carcinoma group by pathology,The Ktrans Max、Kep Max、Kep Mean were lower in ductal carcinoma in situ group than those in special carcinoma group,and the Ktrans Max、Kep Mean、MAX Conc Max were lower in non-special invasive carcinoma group than those in special carcinoma group,all the difference is statistically different(P ＜ 0.05),while the other parameters show no statistical difference between the two groups.There were 34 cases of non-high group and 12 cases of high group according to histologic grade in non-special invasive carcinoma.37 cases were assigned to negative group and 24 cases were assigned to positive group by the lymph node status of the pathological result.All the quantitative,semi-quantitative parameters show no statistical difference between the non-high group and high group according to histologic grade,The difference of all the quantitative 、semi-quantitative parameters between negative group and positive group by the lymph node status of the pathological result show no statistical difference either.Conclusion Some quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters based on DCE-MRI were valuable in differentiating special carcinoma from ductal carcinoma in situ and non-special invasive carcinoma in human breast cancer.

Association Between Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Imaging Features and WHO Histopathological Grade in Patients with Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer.

The use of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in differentiating between benign and malignant breast tumors and predicting the histologic grade for breast cancer patients

Heterogeneity Of Tumor And Its Surrounding Stroma On Dce-Mri And Diffusion Weighted Imaging In Predicting Histological Grade And Lymph Node Status Of Breast Cancer

Value of magnetic resonance imaging radiomics features in predicting histologic grade of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

Integration of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and T2-weighted imaging radiomic features by a canonical correlation analysis-based feature fusion method to predict histological grade in ductal breast carcinoma.

Prediction of Histological Grade in Breast Cancer by Combining DCE-MRI and DWI Features

Quantitative Parameters of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: the Correlation with Pathological Prognostic Factors.

Correlation Between the Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Features and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer

Prediction of Histological Grade and Ki-67 Expression in Breast Cancer by DCE-MRI and DWI Features

Quantitative Parameters Correlated Well with Differentiation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma at Head and Neck: a Study of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI

Correlation Between Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Histopathology in the Measurement of Tumor and Breast Volume and Their Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients: a Prospective Study.

Correlation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging with Prognostic Factors and Subtypes of Breast Cancers.

Radiogenomic analysis of breast cancer: Dynamic contrast enhanced - Magnetic resonance imaging based features are associated with molecular subtypes

Prediction and Prognosis of Biologically Aggressive Breast Cancers by the Combination of DWI/DCE-MRI and Immunohistochemical Tumor Markers.

The Correlation of Quantitative and Semi-Quantitative Parameters Obtained from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Histopathology in Human Breast Cancer

Dynamic MRI-derived parameters for hot and cold spots: correlation with breast cancer histopathology.

Assessment of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in distinguishing different histologic grades of breast phyllode tumor

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value of HER2-positive/HR-negative Breast Carcinoma.

The utility of ultrafast MRI and conventional DCE-MRI for predicting histologic aggressiveness in patients with breast cancer

Valuation of morphology and dynamic enhanced images features of breast diseases with 1.5T MRI

Application value of different model of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pathological grading of breast invasive ductal carcinoma