The Influence of Intercritical Temperature, Ferrite-Austenite Morphology, and Orientation Relationship on Martensitic Transformation in Dual Phase Steels
Bilal Nawaz,Qingfei Hu,Tianyu Zhang,Lingyu Wang,Yizhuang Li,Wei Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110275
IF: 3.8
2024-01-01
Materials Today Communications
Abstract:Two different morphologies of martensite in dual-phase (DP) steel were obtained through two processing routes. In the first method, the steel was water quenched from a fully austenitic state, followed by intercritical annealing (IA). In the second method, the steel was water quenched, cold rolled, and then subjected to intercritical annealing (C-IA). For IA and C-IA steels, the intercritical temperatures varied from 735 C-degrees to 765 C-degrees to obtain different fractions of ferrite. To understand the effect of ferrite content, morphology, and the orientation of ferrite/austenite on martensitic transformation, a combination of scanning electron microscopy, electron backscattered diffraction, and dilatometric tests were conducted. It was observed that layered martensite presented in IA samples, and blocky martensite appeared only at prior austenite boundaries at 765 C-degrees. In C-IA samples, equiaxed martensite grains were present, which become coarser by elevating the temperature to 765 C-degrees. In IA samples, martensitic transformation was much faster than in C-IA samples; the difference in martensitic transformation rate is particularly significant at lower annealing temperatures. Carbon enrichment of the partial austenite had a converse effect on the martensitic transformation at 745 C-degrees in both samples. The highest transformation rate was recorded in IA samples at 745 C-degrees among all IA and C-IA samples. The ferrite/martensite in IA samples maintained Kurdjumov-Sachs orientation relationship (K-S OR) with prior austenite and selected the same variant in the same block. Whereas, in polygonal samples, ferrite/martensite had an irrational OR with the prior austenite, no variant selection appeared in ferrite and martensite grains. Martensite nucleation accelerated on the ferrite surface when it had a K-S OR with the matrix grain, forming a low-energy interface with the ferrite. In contrast, ferrite surfaces irrationally oriented with the matrix grain did not promote martensite nucleation. This was likely due to the large misorientation and higher carbon build-up near the boundary during intercritical holding. The lower activation energy for martensitic nucleation in IA samples compared to C-IA samples resulted in an accelerated rate of martensite transformation in IA samples.