Comparison of soil heavy metals extraction using three in-vitro digestion tests

LI Yi,ZHANG Ming-kui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2012.10.012
2012-01-01
Abstract:To compare the extraction efficiency of different in-vitro digestion tests, three representative and universally used in-vitro digestion tests (SBET, Simple Bioaccessibility Extraction Test; PBET, Physiologically-Based Extraction Test; SGET, Simple Gastrointestinal Extraction Test) were chosen to evaluate the bioaccessibility of soil Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd. Significant differences among extraction ability of three in-vitro digestion tests were found, and the extraction ability of three in-vitro digestion tests for soil Zn and Cd in descending order was: SBET>PBET>SGET. Although the bioaccessibility of soil Zn, Pb and Cd in the gastric phase of PBET and SGET were clearly higher than those in the corresponding gastrointestinal phase, the bioaccessibility of soil Cu in the gastric phase could be less than those in the corresponding gastrointestinal phase due to the complexation with digestive enzymes (pepsin, bile salts and pancreatin). Then it is known the solubility of soil Zn, Pb and Cd in the gastric phase can represent their maximum absorbable amounts in digestive tract, while the solubility of soil Cu in the gastric phase can not. Therefore, the bioaccessibility of soil Zn, Pb and Cd can be evaluated only using gastric juice, like SBET, but soil Cu bioaccessiblity should be evaluated by synthetic digestive juice composed of gastrointestinal juice with corresponding digestive enzymes (pepsin, bile salts and pancreatin), like PBET.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?