Abstract:The Hertz theory provides a foundation for understanding the contact behavior between elastic bodies. However, the theory's reliance on static equilibrium assumptions limits its applicability to dynamic scenarios, particularly where the contact interface experiences rapid changes in stress due to impact or vibration. This paper addresses the gap in the literature regarding the dynamic normal stress at the contact interface between a rigid sphere and an elastic half-space based on the theory of particle dynamics. Our approach begins by establishing a system of particle dynamics equations for the interface contact zone. By decoupling these equations based on the lateral and tangential motion characteristics of the particles, we derive a unified normal dynamics equation that describes the relative relationship between the normal strain of each particle and the center point of the interface. Utilizing the dynamic equation of the interface collision center and the motion equation of the small ball, we determine the absolute values of the normal strain of each particle in the interface contact zone. The research results demonstrate that the lateral and tangential strains (forces) prior to collision do not directly affect the sphere motion in the normal direction, while the incremental strains (forces) post-collision significantly do. By analyzing the normal dynamic equations of the contact zone, we obtain the lateral stress increment, tangential stress increment, and the distribution law of normal stress for each particle at the interface. In conclusion, the normal strain values obtained using our proposed method, when compared with those from Hertz theory at the maximum collision depth, are significantly greater. This indicates that our method is more effective in explaining contact interface damage phenomena, which are not adequately addressed by Hertz theory. The findings have implications for understanding and predicting contact interface failure in engineering applications, particularly under dynamic loading conditions.

Elasto-Plastic Analysis of A Contact under Normal and Torque Loading

Elasto-Plastic Indentation of A Half-Space by A Rigid Sphere under Normal and Torque Loading

A New Fast Method for Solving Contact Plasticity and Its Application in Analyzing Elasto-Plastic Partial Slip

Effects of Load Configuration on Partial Slip Contact Between an Elasticplastic Sphere and a Rigid Flat

A Simplified Numerical Elastic-Plastic Contact Model for Rough Surfaces

Spherical Elastic–Plastic Contact Model for Power-Law Hardening Materials under Combined Normal and Tangential Loads

Surface Mechanics Induced Stress Disturbances in an Elastic Half-Space Subjected to Tangential Surface Loads

Investigation of Normal Dynamic Contact Stiffness and Damping Characteristics in Mixed Lubrication for Non-Gaussian Rough Surfaces

Study on Thermal Elasto-plastic Contact Problems with Temperature-dependent Properties

An Elastic-Plastic Spherical Contact Model under Combined Normal and Tangential Loading

Dynamic Normal Stress Determination at the Rigid Sphere-Elastic Half-Space Interface: A Particle Dynamics Approach

Numerical analysis of partial slip contact under a tangential force and a twisting moment

Time harmonic point load and dynamic contact problem of contacting fluid and poroelastic half-spaces

Analysis and Convenient Formulas for Elasto-Plastic Contacts of Nominally Flat Surfaces: Average Gap, Contact Area Ratio, and Plastically Deformed Volume

A Numerical Elastic–plastic Contact Model for a Half-Space with Inhomogeneous Inclusions and Cracks

Partial Slip Contact Analysis on Three-Dimensional Elastic Layered Half Space

An Elastoplastic Contact Model Considering Wear Based on Digital Rough Surfaces in Spatial Domain

Mesh-free Method for Thermal Elasto-plastic Contact of Rough Surfaces

A Frictionless Normal Contact Model for Flattening Elastoplastic Single Asperity Considering Yield Plateau and Strain Hardening

A Review of Elastic–Plastic Contact Mechanics

Analysis on Elastic–plastic Spherical Contact and Its Deformation Regimes, the One Parameter Regime and Two Parameter Regime, by Finite Element Simulation