Development of A Simplified Chinese Version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (hoos): Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation
X. Wei,Z. Wang,C. Yang,B. Wu,X. Liu,H. Yi,Z. Chen,F. Wang,Y. Bai,J. Li,X. Zhu,M. Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.018
IF: 7.507
2012-01-01
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Abstract:Osteoarthritis (OA) has a profound impact on health-related quality of life1Veenhof C. Huisman P.A. Barten J.A. Takken T. Pisters M.F. Factors associated with physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012; 20: 6-12Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar. Increasing importance has been attached to utilization of disease-specific, self-reported outcome measures2Thorborg K. Roos E.M. Bartels E.M. Petersen J. Hölmich P. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review.Br J Sports Med. 2010; 44: 1186-1196Crossref PubMed Scopus (126) Google Scholar, such as the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) instrument3Klassbo M. Larsson E. Mannevik E. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.Scand J Rheumatol. 2003; 32: 46-51Crossref PubMed Scopus (313) Google Scholar. China is the most populous country in the world with 1.3 billion people. Hence, we translated and adapted the HOOS into a Simplified Chinese version (SC-HOOS) and validated it in a cohort of native Chinese-speaking patients with hip OA, relative to the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), a visual analog scale (VAS), and the Harris hip score (HHS) test. Psychometric testing for internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness was conducted. The SC-HOOS showed satisfactory internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness when evaluated in Chinese-speaking patients with hip OA. A total of 131 consecutive patients (58 men, 73 women) with a diagnosis of primary hip OA were recruited from the Department of Orthopedics of our medical university between December 2010 and August 2011, and enrolled in accordance with the quality criteria described by Terwee et al.4Terwee C.B. Bot S.D. de Boer M.R. van der Windt D.A. Knol D.L. Dekker J. et al.Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 34-42Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6038) Google Scholar They had a mean age of 51.3 (9.1) years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.2 (3.0) kg/m2. The project was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of our institution, and each patient signed a written informed consent. The inclusion criteria were: age >18 years, ability to read and speak Chinese, and primary hip OA diagnosis according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology5Altman R. Alarcon G. Appelrouth D. Bloch D. Borenstein D. Brandt K. et al.The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip.Arthritis Rheum. 1991; 34: 505-514Crossref PubMed Scopus (1537) Google Scholar. The exclusion criteria were: history of leg or spine surgery, tumors, infection, rheumatologic disease, ankylosing spondylitis, and/or neuropathologies; inability or unwillingness to complete questionnaires independently. Patients in whom surgical treatment [total hip replacement (THR) subgroup] was deemed necessary (N = 52) were allowed 3 months postoperatively to finish their questionnaires. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Mean values are reported with standard deviations (SDs). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P values of <0.05 were considered significant. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed according to previously published guidelines regarding dual forward translation, synthesis of the dual translations using resolution by consensus, backward translation into English to reveal any discrepancies, reconciliation by expert committee consensus, and a test of the pre-final SC-HOOS6Guillemin F. Bombardier C. Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46: 1417-1432Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4008) Google Scholar, 7Beaton D.E. Bombardier C. Guillemin F. Ferraz M.B. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25: 3186-3191Crossref PubMed Scopus (6664) Google Scholar. Our examination of the final SC-HOOS (see Appendix) was consistent with recommendations for cross-cultural validation studies of patient-reported outcomes8Roos E.M. Davis A.M. Recommendations for publication of cross-cultural validation studies of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012; 20: 4-5Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar. All 131 patients completed the SC-HOOS, the SF-36, VAS, and HHS in an outpatient hospital room. Patients were asked to finish the SC-HOOS first, before the other tests, and the time frame for completing the SC-HOOS was 15 min. The HOOS includes five subscales: pain (10 items), other symptoms (10 items), function in daily living (ADL) (17 items), function in sports and recreation (Sport/Rec) (four items), and hip-related quality of life (QoL) (four items). A five-point Likert scale was used and each item was given a score of 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), or 4 (extreme). All of the item scores within each subscale were summed, divided by the maximum score, and then deducted from 100, such that more extreme symptoms resulted in a larger deduction from 100, and thus a lesser subscale score. The normalized scores, from 0 (indicating extreme symptoms) to 100 (indicating no symptoms), for each subscale were plotted in an outcome profile for each participant. The HHS is a multidimensional observational assessment that contains questions about pain, function, deformity, and range of motion, with a total score ranging from 100 (no disability) to 0 (maximum disability)9Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51: 737-755PubMed Google Scholar. The SF-36 contains eight domains: physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Each raw subscale scores was transformed to a 100-point scale. The SF-36 has been translated into Chinese and thoroughly tested. Finally, the VAS allows patients to rate pain intensity along a 100-mm line ranging from "no pain" to "worst pain imaginable". Floor and ceiling effects exceeding 15% were considered significant4Terwee C.B. Bot S.D. de Boer M.R. van der Windt D.A. Knol D.L. Dekker J. et al.Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 34-42Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6038) Google Scholar. The SC-HOOS subscale scores were well-distributed, with no floor or ceiling effects. To evaluate acceptability, patients were asked about any difficulties that had been encountered. The data were checked for missing or multiple responses and the completeness of the SC-HOOS was calculated. Missing data were treated as recommended by Nilsdotter et al.10Nilsdotter A.K. Lohmander L.S. Klassbo M. Roos E.M. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)-validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003; 30: 10Crossref Scopus (644) Google Scholar Most (127/131; 96.9%) of the patients responded that they did not have any difficulties with completing the SC-HOOS. The remaining four patients left the question unanswered. The average time for patients to finish the SC-HOOS was 10.4 (3.2) min, similar to that reported previously. The total numbers of improperly answered items in the total test group, the retest subgroup, and the THR subgroup were relatively few at 352/5240 (3.6%), 143/2400 (6.0%), and 97/2080 (4.7%), respectively. The correct completion rates for the entire SC-HOOS were 96.4%, 94.0%, and 95.3% for total test group, the retest subgroup, and the THR subgroup, respectively. Internal consistency of the SC-HOOS subscales was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's α coefficient, where α > 0.80 and α > 0.90 were regarded as good and excellent, respectively4Terwee C.B. Bot S.D. de Boer M.R. van der Windt D.A. Knol D.L. Dekker J. et al.Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 34-42Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6038) Google Scholar. The Cronbach's α coefficients for the subscales (see Table I) were high (0.865–0.968), especially for the pain and ADL subscales, indicating good internal consistency.Table IInternal consistency, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the SC-HOOSParameterSC-HOOS subscale (No. items)Symptoms (5)Pain (10)ADL (17)Sport/Rec (4)QoL (4)Internal consistencyCronbach's α0.8830.9390.9680.8650.87Construct validity indicated by Pearson correlation coefficient, r (P value), vs indicated instrumentsSF-36 domains PF0.771 (<0.0001)0.728 (<0.0001)0.769 (<0.0001)0.733 (<0.0001)0.734 (<0.0001) RP0.420 (<0.0001)0.441 (<0.0001)0.451 (<0.0001)0.418 (<0.0001)0.427 (<0.0001) BP0.636 (<0.0001)0.701 (<0.0001)0.628 (<0.0001)0.666 (<0.0001)0.712 (<0.0001) GH0.508 (<0.0001)0.485 (<0.0001)0.510 (<0.0001)0.412 (<0.0001)0.446 (<0.0001) VT0.230 (0.0082)0.291 (0.0008)0.276 (0.0014)0.211 (0.0157)0.261 (0.0026) SF0.463 (<0.0001)0.458 (0.0001)0.473 (<0.0001)0.429 (0.0001)0.479 (<0.0001) RE0.248 (0.0043)0.252 (0.0037)0.266 (0.0021)0.239 (0.0061)0.308 (0.0003) MH0.221 (0.0113)0.182 (0.0374)0.190 (0.0299)0.264 (0.0023)0.217 (0.0129)VAS−0.765 (<0.0001)−0.786 (<0.0001)−0.766 (<0.0001)−0.714 (0.0001)−0.777 (<0.0001)HHS0.898 (<0.0001)0.848 (<0.0001)0.887 (<0.0001)0.827 (0.0001)0.893 (<0.0001)Test–retest reliability, mean (SD) or ICC value (CI range)Test score46.3 (18.0)46.6 (17.2)46.2 (18.1)42.5 (16.9)44.6 (19.7)Retest score48.2 (16.9)47.3 (16.8)45.8 (17.6)44.1 (17.0)42.4 (19.8)Score change1.8 (6.0)0.8 (4.0)−0.4 (5.4)1.6 (8.9)−2.2 (8.2)ICC (95% CI)0.940 (0.902–0.964)0.973 (0.955–0.984)0.956 (0.921–0.973)0.862 (0.780–0.915)0.913 (0.859–0.947)Responsiveness pre-THR vs 3 months after THR, mean (SD)*N = 52; higher scores represent less pain. For comparison, the HHS yielded values of 28.7 (6.9), 51.3 (15.5), 22.6 (9.6), 3.28, and 2.35, respectively, for the responsiveness parameters.Pre-THR score27.8 (11.5)31.8 (8.7)30.0 (10.6)27.7 (10.6)27.7 (9.8)Post-THR score57.4 (9.1)60.8 (11.1)58.3 (9.6)54.5 (9.6)53.7 (8.4)Change29.6 (9.5)29.0 (12.8)28.3 (13.1)26.8 (12.3)29.4 (13.4)ES2.573.332.672.533.01SRM3.122.272.162.182.19∗ N = 52; higher scores represent less pain. For comparison, the HHS yielded values of 28.7 (6.9), 51.3 (15.5), 22.6 (9.6), 3.28, and 2.35, respectively, for the responsiveness parameters. Open table in a new tab Sixty patients were randomly selected to be in the retest subgroup according to a computer generated randomized number table. These patients were asked to complete the SC-HOOS again at home 7 days after they had completed it the first time, and then to return it by mail once they finished it. A 1-week interval was chosen because it is too brief for obvious post-treatment clinical changes to be apparent, and also because 1 week is the time that THR patients needed to wait for surgery, enabling them to participate in the reliability evaluation. An ICC (two-way random effects model) was calculated to quantify test–retest reliability. An ICC value of 0.60–0.80 indicated good reliability, and an ICC >0.80 indicated excellent reliability11Landis J.R. Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-174Crossref PubMed Scopus (51055) Google Scholar. Mean subscale scores, score changes from test to retest, ICCs, and CIs are listed in Table I. The inter-test ICCs (0.862–0.973) indicated excellent test–retest reliability, indicating that this instrument yields similar results across trials and thus has excellent stability. Bland–Altman plots12Bland J.M. Altman D.G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8: 135-160Crossref PubMed Scopus (6646) Google Scholar (Fig. 1) of test–retest differences between subscale measures for individual patients relative to overall means of the two sessions showed no systematic bias between sessions, indicating good test–retest agreement of the subscales13Ornetti P. Parratte S. Gossec L. Tavernier C. Argenson J.N. Roos E.M. et al.Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) in hip osteoarthritis patients.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18: 522-529Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar. Good construct validity means that a questionnaire correlates well with measures of the same construct (convergent validity) while correlating poorly with measures of different constructs (divergent or discriminant validity). Pearson correlation coefficients (r) of the SC-HOOS subscales scores were determined relative to scores from the eight SF-36 domains, the VAS, and the HHS. The correlations were judged as poor (r = 0–0.20), fair (r = 0.21–0.40), moderate (r = 0.41–0.60), very good (r = 0.61–0.80), or excellent (r = 0.81–1.0). It was hypothesized that the SC-HOOS subscales should correlate strongly with the PF and BP domains of the SF-36 (especially for pain and ADL), moderately with the GH, RP, and SF domains, and poorly with the VT, MH, and RE (mental health related) domains of the SF-36. The SC-HOOS subscales were expected to correlate well with the HHS and VAS. The construct validity evaluation results obtained by comparing SC-HOOS subscales versus SF-36 domains, VAS, and HHS are shown in Table I. Pearson correlation analyses between the SC-HOOS and the SF-36 indicated that all of the SC-HOOS subscales correlated robustly with the PF (r = 0.728–0.771, P < 0.0001) and BP (r = 0.628–0.712, P < 0.0001) domains of the SF-36. SC-HOOS subscales correlated moderately with the RP (r = 0.418–0.451, P < 0.0001), GH (r = 0.412–0.510, P < 0.0001), and SF (r = 0.429–0.479, P < 0.0001) domains of the SF-36, and correlated weakly with the VT (r = 0.211–0.291, P = 0.0008–0.0152), RE (r = 0.239–0.308, P = 0.0004–0.0061), and MH (r = 0.182–0.264, P = 0.0023–0.0374) domains. All five SC-HOOS subscales correlated strongly with the VAS results (r = −0.714–0.786, P < 0.0001) and the HHS results (r = 0.827–0.898, P < 0.0001). The SC-HOOS exhibited satisfactory construct validity. Its strong correlations with the PF and BP domains of the SF-36, HHS, and VAS indicate that the SC-HOOS has good convergent validity. Meanwhile, its weak correlations with the VT, RE, and MH domains of the SF-36 demonstrate the divergent or discriminant validity of the SC-HOOS. There were excellent correlations between the SC-HOOS subscales and the HHS, which measures some similar constructs (pain and function). However, it is worth pointing out that the HHS is administered by a physician, whereas the HOOS is a self-report questionnaire that can be administered by mail. The responsiveness4Terwee C.B. Bot S.D. de Boer M.R. van der Windt D.A. Knol D.L. Dekker J. et al.Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 34-42Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6038) Google Scholar, 14Davies G.M. Watson D.J. Bellamy N. Comparison of the responsiveness and relative effect size of the western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the short-form Medical Outcomes Study Survey in a randomized, clinical trial of osteoarthritis patients.Arthritis Care Res. 1999; 12: 172-179Crossref PubMed Google Scholar of the SC-HOOS was tested by comparison of the preoperative and 3-month postoperative scores of the THR groups (N = 52; Student's t test). Standardized response mean (SRM), defined as the mean change between these time points, divided by the SD of this change, was calculated. Effect size (ES), defined as the mean change between preoperative results and 3-month postoperative results divided by the SD of the preoperative HOOS score, was also calculated. These data are summarized in Table I. The scores for all subscales improved postoperatively compared to preoperative values (P < 0.001). All of the subscales showed excellent responsiveness. The SRMs and ESs of the SC-HOOS subscales were similar to the SRM and ES of the HHS. Similar to other studies reporting high responsiveness of HOOS instruments10Nilsdotter A.K. Lohmander L.S. Klassbo M. Roos E.M. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)-validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003; 30: 10Crossref Scopus (644) Google Scholar, 13Ornetti P. Parratte S. Gossec L. Tavernier C. Argenson J.N. Roos E.M. et al.Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) in hip osteoarthritis patients.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18: 522-529Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar, 15Lee Y.K. Chung C.Y. Koo K.H. Lee K.M. Lee D.J. Lee S.C. et al.Transcultural adaptation and testing of psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS).Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19: 853-857Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar, we found that all of the subscales had high responsiveness in Chinese hip OA patients receiving THR. The responsiveness of the SC-HOOS was similar to that of the HHS in terms of SRM and ES values, strengthening our inference that the SC-HOOS has excellent responsiveness. We did not test the responsiveness of the SC-HOOS in patients undergoing non-surgical treatments due to the inadequate sample size following division of patients with respect to differing drug regimes, a lack of suitable controls, and the potential for a placebo effect13Ornetti P. Parratte S. Gossec L. Tavernier C. Argenson J.N. Roos E.M. et al.Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) in hip osteoarthritis patients.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18: 522-529Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar. Several hip joint-specific, self-reported disability instruments, such as the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford hip score, have been developed for people with hip disabilities and are used extensively in research and clinical settings. However, the WOMAC is limited in that it only assesses pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. The HOOS includes more questions and subscales, and enables a more comprehensive evaluation, than the WOMAC. With the globalization of clinical research and the vigorous development of health-related quality of life research in China, there is an increasing need for valid questionnaires in Chinese that have solid psychometric properties but are not administratively burdensome. The HOOS, being a multidimensional and internationally used questionnaire designed to subjectively assess patients with hip disabilities is suitable for meeting this aim3Klassbo M. Larsson E. Mannevik E. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.Scand J Rheumatol. 2003; 32: 46-51Crossref PubMed Scopus (313) Google Scholar. The present results provide strong evidence that the SC-HOOS is similarly reliable and valid for evaluating pain and functional status in Chinese patients, similar to versions of the HOOS in French, Dutch, and Korean13Ornetti P. Parratte S. Gossec L. Tavernier C. Argenson J.N. Roos E.M. et al.Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) in hip osteoarthritis patients.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18: 522-529Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar, 15Lee Y.K. Chung C.Y. Koo K.H. Lee K.M. Lee D.J. Lee S.C. et al.Transcultural adaptation and testing of psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS).Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19: 853-857Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar, 16de Groot I.B. Reijman M. Terwee C.B. Bierma-Zeinstra S.M. Favejee M. Roos E.M. et al.Validation of the Dutch version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007; 15: 104-109Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar. Our study has some limitations. Firstly, the sample was limited in size and may not fully represent the Chinese population. The validity of the SC-HOOS in areas beyond mainland China remains to be tested. Additionally, the responsiveness of the SC-HOOS was not assessed in patients receiving conservative treatments. Thus, it will be important to validate the SC-HOOS in a broader population and to probe the responsiveness of this instrument in hip OA patients receiving non-surgical treatments. In conclusion, the HOOS was successfully cross-culturally adapted into Simplified Chinese. The SC-HOOS was demonstrated to have good acceptability, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. This work will enable the HOOS to become widely used by physicians and researchers in mainland China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Validation of the hip disability osteoarthritis outcome Score-12 shortform in a German cohort
Matthias Büttner,Felix Wunderlich,Philipp Drees,Yama Afghanyar,Sebastian Fischer,Philipp Schippers,Lukas Eckhard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05561-6
Abstract:Introduction: To consider the inherent respondent burden of PROMs, the HOOS-12 as a shortform of the well-established HOOS questionnaire has been published. While the HOOS-12 has been validated in an initial study, further evaluation in other, non-English speaking cohorts is necessary. We therefore aimed to evaluate responsiveness, convergent construct validity, internal consistency, and floor and ceiling effects of the HOOS-12 in a cross-sectoral german cohort. Materials and methods: European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions scores and HOOS data of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) were used for the analyses. HOOS-12 scores were calculated from the full length HOOS. Statistical analysis was conducted, investigating internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, convergent and discriminant validity, responsiveness, and known-group comparisons. Results: A ceiling effect was present for postoperative HOOS-12 score and its pain, function and QoL subscales. Internal consistency was high between baseline and all follow ups, inter-item correlation was high (Cronbach's alpha > 0.30) for HOOS-12 score and all subscales. Correlation of HOOS-12 pain with HOOS pain was high (r = 0.9). Correlation of HOOS-12 function with HOOS ADL and HOOS S/R was high (r = 0.89, r = 0.74). Correlation was moderate between HOOS-12 pain and HOOS-12 function with its respective EQ-5D score (r=-0.58, r=-0.59). Conclusion: The HOOS-12 showed good convergent construct validity and is responsive to changes in pain, function, QoL and hip impact between preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. A substantial ceiling effect for all subscales at 1 year postoperatively limits the ability to capture variance across particularly well performing patients. Trial registration: The Trial is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register ( https://www.drks.de ; DRKS00013972; 23 March 23, 2018).
-
Validation of the HOOS, JR: A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey
Stephen Lyman,Yuo-Yu Lee,Patricia D. Franklin,Wenjun Li,David J. Mayman,Douglas E. Padgett
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4718-2
IF: 4.755
2016-06-01
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Abstract:BackgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly in demand for outcomes evaluation by hospitals, administrators, and policymakers. However, assessing total hip arthroplasty (THA) through such instruments is challenging because most existing measures of hip health are lengthy and/or proprietary.Questions/purposesThe objective of this study was to derive a patient-relevant short-form survey based on the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), focusing specifically on outcomes after THA.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent primary unilateral THA and who had completed preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMs using our hospital’s hip replacement registry. The 2-year followup in this population was 81% (4308 of 5351 patients). Of these, 2371 completed every item on the HOOS before surgery and at 2 years, making them eligible for the formal item reduction analysis. Through semistructured interviews with 30 patients, we identified items in the HOOS deemed qualitatively most important to patients with hip osteoarthritis. The original HOOS has 40 items, the four quality-of-life items were excluded a priori, five were excluded for being redundant, and one was excluded based on patient-relevance surveys. The remaining 30 items were evaluated using Rasch modeling to yield a final six-item HOOS, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR), representing a single construct of “hip health.” We calculated HOOS, JR scores for the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) cohort and validated this new score for internal consistency, external validity (versus HOOS and WOMAC domains), responsiveness to THA, and floor and ceiling effects. Additional external validation was performed using calculated HOOS, JR scores in collaboration with the Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement (FORCE-TJR) nationally representative joint replacement registry (n = 910).ResultsThe resulting six-item PROM (HOOS, JR) retained items only from the pain and activities of daily living domains. It showed high internal consistency (Person Separation Index, 0.86 [HSS]; 0.87 [FORCE]), moderate to excellent external validity against other hip surveys (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, 0.60–0.94), very high responsiveness (standardized response means, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.84–2.22] [FORCE]; and 2.38 [95% CI, 2.27–2.49] [HSS]), and favorable floor (0.6%–1.9%) and ceiling (37%–46%) effects. External validity was highest for the HOOS pain (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.86–0.89] [HSS]; and 0.87 [95% CI, 0.84–0.90] [FORCE]) and HOOS activities of daily living (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93–0.95] [HSS]; and 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93–0.96] [FORCE]) domains in the HSS validation cohort and the FORCE-TJR cohort.ConclusionsThe HOOS, JR provides a valid, reliable, and responsive measure of hip health for patients undergoing THA. This short-form PROM is patient relevant and efficient.Level of EvidenceLevel III, diagnostic study.
surgery,orthopedics
-
Psychometric Analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
Emilie N Miley,Madeline P Casanova,Michael A Pickering,Scott W Cheatham,Lindsay W Larkins,Adam C Cady,Russell T Baker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171789
2024-09-07
Abstract:Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (HOOS) was developed as a region- and disease-specific outcome to assess hip disability. Despite the use of the HOOS in clinical practice and research, psychometric analyses of the scale in a large dataset of patients have not been performed. As such, the purposes of this study were to assess the structural validity of the HOOS in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) global registry. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the scale structure of the 40-item HOOS and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a parsimonious scale structure. The parsimonious model identified was subjected to multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing and LGC modeling. The original five-factor, 40-item HOOS did not meet recommended model fit indices values (CFI = 0.822, TLI = 0.809, IFI = 0.822, RMSEA = 0.085). Alternate model generation identified an alternative model (i.e., HOOS-9). Sound model fit was identified for the HOOS-9 (CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.046). Invariance testing criteria were also met between groups (i.e., age and sex) and across time. Lastly, a nonlinear growth trajectory was identified in responses pertaining to hip disability. The original scale structure of the 40-item HOOS was not supported. The HOOS-9 met contemporary model fit recommendations, along with multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing. Our findings support the preliminary use of the HOOS-9 to assess hip function and disability in research and clinical practice.
-
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and convergent and known-group validity of the Turkish full version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in patients with hip osteoarthritis
Ayşenur Gökşen,Remzi Çaylak,Fatma Kübra Çekok,Turhan Kahraman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46497/archrheumatol.2024.10197
2023-09-28
Archives of Rheumatology
Abstract:Objectives: The study aimed to culturally adapt the full version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) into Turkish and evaluate its reliability and validity. Patients and methods: Patients with hip osteoarthritis were included in the methodological crosscultural adaptation study between May 2022 and December 2022. We translated and adapted the HOOS into a Turkish version and validated it in a cohort of native Turkish-speaking patients with hip osteoarthritis. The HOOS includes five subscales named symptoms, pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sport and recreation (Sport/Rec), and quality of life (QoL). The psychometric properties of the Turkish HOOS were assessed. The reliability was investigated using test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC) and internal consistency methods (Cronbach’s alpha). The convergent validity of the Turkish HOOS was evaluated by testing the predefined hypotheses using the correlations with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the European Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D-3L), a generic QoL scale. Results: A total of 202 patients (131 females, 71 males; mean age: 55.2±9.7 years; range, 50 to 70 years) were recruited for the study. Cronbach’s alpha values for each subscale of the HOOS were as follows: symptoms=0.76, pain=0.94, ADL=0.96, Sport/Rec=0.87, QoL=0.78, and total score=0.98, indicating it has high internal consistency. For all subscales and total score of the HOOS, the ICC values were between 0.77 and 0.86, indicating good to excellent test-retest reliability. All correlations between each subscale and total score of the Turkish HOOS, WOMAC, and EQ-5D-3L were moderate to strong. Therefore, 23 predefined hypotheses out of 24 were confirmed with a confirmation rate of 96%, indicating the Turkish version of the HOOS had adequate convergent validity. Conclusion: This study shows that the Turkish version of the HOOS has a convergent and knowngroup validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. It can be used to assess the patient's perception of their hip and associated difficulties, as well as their symptoms and functional limitations.
rheumatology
-
Hip complaints differ across age and sex: a population-based reference data for the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
A Sundén,K Lidengren,E M Roos,L S Lohmander,E Ekvall Hansson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1022-8
IF: 3.077
2018-10-11
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Abstract:BackgroundThe Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) is a self-administered hip-specific questionnaire intended to evaluate symptoms and functional limitations, and it is commonly used to evaluate interventions in individuals with hip dysfunction or hip osteoarthritis. The HOOS consists of 43 questions in five subscales: Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and Hip-Related Quality of Life. This study aimed to establish population-based reference values for the HOOS and to describe the variation of hip-related symptoms in an adult population.MethodsThe HOOS questionnaire was mailed to 840 individuals aged 18–84 years randomly retrieved from a national population record for the Skåne region of Southern Sweden.ResultsThe overall response rate was 67%. Older women and men consistently reported more hip-related complaints than those younger. There were significant differences between the oldest and the youngest age groups in all five subscales in women and men.ConclusionsHip-related pain, symptoms, activity of daily life and quality of life varied with age and sex in this population-based cohort. Our findings show the importance of using age- and sex-matched reference values for evaluation of outcomes after interventions due to hip-related problems.
health care sciences & services,health policy & services
-
Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Oxford Hip Score
Xueqin Liu
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Oxford Hip Score(OHS).Methods A total of 127 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were divided into three groups,including those pre-operative,one year and three years post-operative and investigated with OHS(Chinese version),SF-8 and EQ-5D.Then 20 cases were selected within the three groups respectively for repeated testing.Results The reliability coefficient(Cronbach's α) of the OHS was 0.94.Test-retest Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.98,0.91,0.76.Two public factors were extracted with factor analysis,and the corresponding factors of the projects were satisfied with factor loading.Conclusion The Chinese version of Oxford Hip Score is reliable and valid to determine the function of hip for Chinese patients.
-
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Shunwu Fan,Ziʼang Hu,Hao Hong,Fengdong Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b0460
IF: 3.241
2012-01-01
Spine
Abstract:Study Design. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was translated and then adapted and validated. Objective. Translation of the RMDQ into simplified Chinese characters (SCRMDQ), and its cross-cultural adaptation and validation in patients with low back pain with or without radicular leg pain. Summary of Background Data. The RMDQ is used worldwide and versions in traditional Chinese characters are available in Hong Kong and Taiwan. But there is no version in simplified Chinese characters for use in Mainland China. Methods. The original version of the RMDQ was translated and back-translated, and then cross-cultural adaptation of the simplified Chinese version was performed following published guidelines. The SCRMDQ was validated in 150 patients, 30 of whom finished the prefinal SCRMDQ and helped determine the final version. The remaining 120 patients were asked to complete the final SCRMDQ, simplified Chinese Oswestry Disability Index (SCODI), and visual analogue scale. Reliability was assessed with the final version using internal consistency by the Cronbach alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient; structural validity was evaluated by correspondence analysis. Then comparison of SCRMDQ and SCODI was performed. Results. A total of 116 patients in the final validation study finished the questionnaires completely. Their mean age was 52.17 +/- 11.95 years (range, 22-78 yr) and the mean low back pain duration was 42.04 +/- 60.94 months (range, 2-480 mo). The average time taken was 4.11 +/- 1.48 minutes (range, 2-9 min) on SCRMDQ and 7.37 +/- 3.98 minutes (range, 3-30 min) on SCODI. The mean SCRMDQ, SCODI, and visual analogue scale scores were 14.07 +/- 4.79 (range, 2-24), 23.98 +/- 10.38 (range, 2-47), and 57.17 +/- 20.72 (range, 0-95), respectively. In the final test, the Cronbach a for internal consistency was 0.826 and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.947; both showed adequate acceptance. Positive and statistically significant correlations were found between SCRMDQ and SCODI (r = 0.791, P < 0.01) and visual analogue scale (r = 0.493, P < 0.01), indicating sufficient structural validation. Most patients preferred SCRMDQ to SCODI, because it was simpler to understand and easier to finish. Conclusion. The SCRMDQ was reliable and valid as a low back pain measurement tool in patients with or without radicular leg pain in Mainland China. The further use and research with the questionnaire were recommended.
-
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the High Activity Arthroplasty Score
Dongping Wan,Shihang Cao,Xinrui Li,Qiang Zan,Shuxin Yao,Jianbing Ma,Lei Shang,Chao Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prom.s451710
2024-01-01
Abstract:Background: The High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) is a validated score that assesses functional outcomes after lower limb arthroplasty, with fewer ceiling effects than other scores. The aim is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the HAAS into a Chinese version (HAAS-C) and to evaluate the psychometric properties of HAAS-C in patients after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: A total of 104 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis who had undergone TKA at least 12 months prior were recruited. A forward and backward translation procedure was performed for developing a culturally acceptable HAAS-C. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) within a 10-day interval. Construct validity was assessed by examining the correlations between HAAS-C and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQoL Group's five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), and Oxford knee score (OKS). Results: HAAS-C demonstrated adequate Internal consistency reliability, as indicated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.75. Test-retest reliability yielded excellent results, with an ICC value of 0.98. Content validity indices were high, with a scale-level validity index of 0.9 and item-level validity indices greater than or equal to 0.8. HAAS-C showed a strong correlation with WOMAC ( r = 0.69), a moderate correlation with EQ-5D-5L ( r = 0.43), and OKS ( r = 0.53) while exhibiting no floor or ceiling effects. Conclusion: The validated HAAS-C questionnaire is a valid instrument for assessing patients undergoing TKA in mainland China.
-
Patient Demographic Factors Affect Response Rates to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients
Yixuan Tong,Vinaya Rajahraman,Rajan Gupta,Roy I Davidovitch,Ran Schwarzkopf,Joshua C Rozell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.033
Abstract:Background: The Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS JR) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measures questionnaire for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, not all patients choose to complete HOOS JR, and thus, a subset of the THA population may be underrepresented. This study aims to investigate the association between patient demographic factors and HOOS JR response rates. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult, English-speaking patients who underwent primary THA by a fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon between 2017 and 2023 at a single, high-volume academic institution. The HOOS JR completion status-complete or incomplete-was recorded for each patient within 90 days of surgery. Standard statistical analyses were performed to assess completion against multiple patient demographic factors. Results: Of the 2,908 total patients, 2,112 (72.6%) had complete and 796 (27.4%) had incomplete HOOS JR questionnaires. Multivariate analysis yielded statistical significance (P < .05) for the distribution of patient age, race, insurance, marital status, and income quartile with respect to questionnaire completion. Patient sex or religion did not affect response rates. Failure to complete HOOS JR (all P < .001) was associated with patients aged 18 to 39 (59.8%), who identified as Black (36.4%) or "other" race (39.6%), were never married (38%), and were in the lower half income quartiles (43.9%, 35.9%) when compared to the overall incomplete rate. Conclusions: Multiple patient demographic factors may affect the HOOS JR response rate. Overall, our analyses suggest that older patients who identify as White and are of higher socioeconomic status are more likely to participate in the questionnaire. Efforts should focus on capturing patient groups less likely to participate to elucidate more generalizable trends in arthroplasty outcomes.
-
The simplified Chinese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis for mainland China: the study of reliability and validity
Liying Yang,Jatuporn Suttiwong,Yanfen Fu,Komsak Sinsurin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00619-2
2023-07-27
Abstract:Background: The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) is a free clinical tool commonly used to evaluate the symptoms and functional status of patients with knee injury. For people who speak Chinese, the Hong Kong Chinese and Singapore Chinese versions are preferred. However, variations in the Chinese language and culture are influenced by the country's geography. KOOS for Mainland China has not been reported. Therefore, the current study was to cross-culturally translate the original English version into a simplified Chinese version and to investigate its psychometric properties. Methods: The simplified Chinese KOOS was obtained through forward-backward translation according to appropriate guidelines. A total of 158 individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) were recruited from 13 hospitals in China to examine the psychometric properties. The test-retest questionnaire was performed at an interval of 5-7 days. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. The data of the first test were used to analyse the construct validity of the simplified Chinese KOOS and Chinese SF-36 through convergent and discriminant validity using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: Cross-cultural translation exhibited minor cultural differences, and the questionnaire was well understood by the patients. The data from 128 patients, used for the test-retest reliability study, showed good to excellent reliability, with an ICC of 0.808-0.976 for all KOOS subscales. The Cronbach's alpha for all subscales ranged from 0.757 to 0.970, indicating acceptable internal consistency. There was a low-to-high correlation between the five domains of the simplified Chinese version of the KOOS and all domains of the SF-36 in construct validity. Conclusion: The simplified Chinese KOOS demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity. In clinical practice and research, this version can help provide valuable information on health-related quality of life for Chinese individuals with KOA in mainland China.
-
Cross-cultural translation and validation of the Chinese Oxford Knee Score and the Activity and Participation Questionnaire
Chen Cheng,Wang Weijun,Wu Hao,Gao Anqi,Qiu Yong,Weng Wenjie,Price Andrew
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499020910668
2020-01-01
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:Objective: To cross-culturally translate and validate the Chinese versions of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Activity and Participation Questionnaire (APQ) in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis who are also candidates for knee replacement. Methods: The Chinese version of the OKS and APQ was completed by standard forward-backward translation and adaption. The feasibility was validated by a pretest in 30 patients. The final version together with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), EQ-5D, and EQ visual analog scale were assessed in 150 patients, and the OKS and APQ were repeated in 30 patients after a 2-week interval. The psychometric properties of the OKS and APQ were evaluated for test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity using Spearman's correlation analysis. Results: All patients were able to understand and complete both the OKS and APQ without difficulty (i.e. no missing data). The ICCs were 0.959 for the OKS, 0.956 for the APQ for total scores, and >0.7 for each item. Cronbach's alpha was greater than 0.7, and the corrected item-total correlation was greater than 0.4 for each item of both questionnaires. The OKS and APQ showed better correlations with questions from the pain and function domains than with those from the mental status domains of the SF-36 and EQ-5D. No floor or ceiling effect was identified in either questionnaire. Conclusions: The Chinese versions of the OKS and APQ are easy to understand and complete and showed good reliability and validity. They can be used to assess patient-reported outcomes after undergoing knee replacement in mainland China.
-
Cross-cultural adaptation of Cantonese (Hong Kong) Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1b
Karlen K. P. Law,P. L. Lee,W. W. Kwan,K. C. Mak,Keith D. K. Luk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06922-0
IF: 2.721
2021-07-12
European Spine Journal
Abstract:PurposeOswestry Disability Index (ODI) was established by Fairbank in 1989 to assess functional disabilities in low back pain (LBP). It was last updated in 2019 as ODI version 2.1b (ODI AU_2.1b). ODI was first translated into Simplified Chinese Oswestry Disability Index (CODI) in 2008 by Lue. The construct validity, internal consistency, level of agreement and the floor and ceiling effects of CODI were found unclear by Yao in 2016. This study will verify how well the adapted Cantonese–Hong Kong Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1b (HKCODI) aligns with ODI AU_2.1b in the Southern Chinese population.MethodsThe translation of ODI AU_2.1b was performed according to guidelines from MAPI Research Trust and American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Psychometric properties of HKCODI were tested statistically by Pearson's correlation, Cronbach's Alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).ResultsA total of 200 subjects (109 males, 91 females) aged from 15 to 85 (mean age = 58.91) with LBP scored from 3/10 to 10/10 in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recruited in the Occupational Therapy Department of a tertiary referral center. HKCODI demonstrated strong construct validity in comparing with Hong Kong Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (HKRMDQ) (r = 0.666, p = 0.000), Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Composite Summary (− 0.700, p = 0.000) and VAS (0.487, p = 0.000). Excellent internal consistency and test–retest reliability were confirmed with Cronbach's Alpha of 0.997 and ICC of 0.993 at 95% confidence level.ConclusionCross-cultural adaptation of ODI AU_2.1b has been translated and validated as HKCODI and Item-8 (Sex Life) was suggested to skip for patient older than 60. HKCODI is a fully self-administered and highly reliable tool in assessing the functional disability of patients with LBP in the Southern Chinese population.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
-
Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Chinese Version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Mainland China
Qi-Hao Zhang,Shi-Xin Du,Gui-Zhou Zheng,Bo Chang,Da Xie,Fei-Xiang Lin,Peng Xie,Guo-Yong Yu,Qin-Xiao Hu,De-Zhong Liu,Xue-Dong Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0621-9504
2018-07-03
Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Abstract:Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaption of the KOOS into Chinese and to evaluate its psychometric properties in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL reconstruction) in mainland China. Design A cross-sectional study. Setting Patients completed the Chinese version of the KOOS and the SF-36 questionnaire three times. We evaluated the reliability, checked the validity, and assessed the responsiveness. Participants A total of 42 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction. Main Outcome Measures The results of the questionnaire survey. Results The Chinese version of the KOOS was well accepted, with ideal test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was significant, with high ICC values ranging from 0.888 to 0.941. Additionally, we found that the internal consistency was adequate, with Cronbachʼs alpha coefficient ranging from 0.740 to 0.975. All a priori hypotheses were supported by a high correlation between the KOOS and SF-36. Furthermore, responsiveness was demonstrated since the ES and SRM between subscales following ACL reconstruction was found in the expected pattern. Conclusions The Chinese version of the KOOS showed psychometric properties demonstrating acceptable reliability and validity similar to the original version. We conclude that the Chinese version is a reliable and valid instrument for research and clinical assessments of ACL reconstruction patients in mainland China.
-
Longitudinal Analysis and Latent Growth Modeling of the Modified Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR)
Emilie N. Miley,Michael A. Pickering,Scott W. Cheatham,Lindsay W. Larkins,Adam C. Cady,Russell T. Baker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12101024
2024-05-16
Health Care
Abstract:The Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR) was developed as a short-form survey to measure progress after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the longitudinal validity of the scale structure pertaining to the modified five-item HOOS-JR has not been assessed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the structural validity, longitudinal invariance properties, and latent growth curve (LGC) modeling of the modified five-item HOOS-JR in a large multi-site sample of patients who underwent a THA. A longitudinal study was conducted using data from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) database. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were conducted to assess the structural validity and longitudinal invariance across five time points. Additionally, LGC modeling was performed to assess the heterogeneity of the recovery patterns for different subgroups of patients. The resulting CFAs met most of the goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 0.964–0.982; IFI = 0.965–0.986; SRMR = 0.021–0.035). Longitudinal analysis did not meet full invariance, exceeding the scalar invariance model (CFIDIFF = 0.012; χ2DIFF test = 702.67). Partial invariance requirements were met upon release of the intercept constraint associated with item five (CFIDIFF test = 0.010; χ2DIFF = 1073.83). The equal means model did not pass the recommended goodness-of-fit indices (CFIDIFF = 0.133; χ2DIFF = 3962.49). Scores significantly changed over time, with the highest scores identified preoperatively and the lowest scores identified at 2- and 3-years postoperatively. Upon conclusion, partial scalar invariance was identified within our model. We identified that patients self-report most improvements in their scores within 6 months postoperatively. Females reported more hip disability at preoperative time points and had faster improvement as measured by the scores of the modified five-item HOOS-JR.
health care sciences & services,health policy & services
-
The Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of the Hip and Groin Outcome Score Questionnaire for a Young and Active Population
Andrea Ricci,Alex Rossi,Mirko Zitti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171755
2024-09-04
Health Care
Abstract:The HAGOS (Hip and Groin Outcome Score) questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of the self-assessment of symptoms, activity limitation, participation restriction, and quality of life (Qol) of subjects with hip and/or groin pain. The aims of this study are to translate and transculturally adapt the HAGOS into Italian (HAGOS-I) and to assess its internal consistency, validity, and reliability in physically active, young, and middle-aged subjects. The translation and transcultural adaptation of (HAGOS-I) was carried out according to international guidelines. Eight-one subjects (mean age 28.19) were included in this study. All the participants completed the HAGOS-I, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-I), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS-I), and the Short Form 36 Health Surveys (SF-36-I). The Cronbach's α for the six HAGOS subscales ranged from 0.63 to 0.87. Statistically significant correlations were obtained between the six HAGOS-I subscales and the LEFS-I (rs = 0.44–0.68; p < 0.01). Only one HAGOS-I subscale (Participation in Physical Activities) did not reach statistical significance with the OHS-I, while the remaining five had a moderate correlation (rs = 0.40–0.60; p < 0.01). The test–retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) ranged from 0.57 to 0.86 for the six HAGOS-I subscales. The HAGOS-I is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in clinical settings with young and middle-aged subjects with hip and/or groin pathologies.
health care sciences & services,health policy & services
-
The Subjective Hip Value is a Valid, Reliable, and Responsive Instrument for Assessing Hip Function in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
Vincent J Leopold,Paul Milan Homm,David Krüger,Christian Hipfl,Carsten Perka,Sebastian Hardt,Vincent J. Leopold
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.061
IF: 4.435
2024-02-01
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures are essential tools in clinical decision-making and research. Multi-item scores like the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) are time-consuming to collect and evaluate. The subjective hip value (SHV), as a single-item value, assesses hip function with one question: "What is the overall percent value of your hip if a completely normal hip represents 100%?". The aims of our study were to assess the psychometric properties, and thus validity, reliability, and responsiveness; and to define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the SHV in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.METHODS: A total of 137 consecutive patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between June 2020 and August 2021 were prospectively enrolled. A SHV and mHHS were collected preoperatively and at follow-ups (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year). Validity, reliability, responsiveness, MCID, and floor/ceiling effects were evaluated.RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between SHV and mHHS (P = .001) preoperatively (rs = 0.532), 6 weeks (rs = 0.649), 3 months (rs = 0.765), 6 months (rs = 0.854), and after 1 year (rs = 0.879). Test-retest reliability (rs = 0.74; P = .001) and responsiveness (rs = 0.24; P = .007) showed significant correlations. The MCID for SHV was 10.06%. Floor- and ceiling-effects were comparable to the mHHS.CONCLUSIONS: The SHV is a valid, reliable, and responsive single-item score for the assessment of hip joint function in arthroplasty patients. It can detect clinically relevant changes in joint function and is easy to collect and interpret, which justifies its implementation in clinical practice.
orthopedics
-
Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Oswestry Disability Index
Hui Liu,Huiren Tao,Zhuojing Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31819e2b34
2009-01-01
Abstract:Study Design. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation were performed on the Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).Objective. The objective of this study was to translate and adapt the ODI into simplified Chinese and to then validate its use in Chinese patients with low back pain.Summary of Background Data. A traditional Chinese version of the ODI (TCODI) has been developed and used in Hong Kong. However, there is no simplified Chinese version of the ODI (SCODI).Methods. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the latest version of the ODI (2.1a) were performed following instructions from the published international guidelines. The translation procedure included forward translation, back translation, and a discussion among experts. The prefinal version was tested in 40 outpatients with LBP. Then, 179 patients with LBP, including 140 outpatients and 39 inpatients, participated in the final test. They finished the SCODI, the Short-Form 36, and the Visual Analog Scale. Those 39 inpatients also finished a second ODI questionnaire within 24 hours. Last, the SCODI and TCODI were tested in another 25 inpatients for comparison.Results. All of the patients in the prefinal test understood the simplified Chinese version correctly. In the final test, Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.93. A very high intraclass correlation coefficient was observed (ICC = 0.99) in the test-retest group. The SCODI showed a significant correlation with the 8 subscales of the Short-Form 36, especially in physical functioning (r = 0.78, P < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between the ODI scores and the Visual Analog Scale (r = 0.69, P < 0.001). A significant difference in the mean score was demonstrated between the SCODI and the TCODI. Patients who participated in the comparison test all agreed that the SCODI was easier to understand than the TCODI.Conclusion. The results showed that the translation and adaptation were successful. The SCODI has proven to be valid and reliable when used in the simplified Chinese speaking population.
-
Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.
Lu Li,Hongmei Wang,Yi Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:0253-9624.2002.02.011
2002-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.
-
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Thai Version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Patellofemoral Pain and Osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF)
Kongpob Reosanguanwong,Wasaphon Suphakitchanusan,Pisit Lertwanich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241279465
IF: 2.6
2024-10-19
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10, October 2024. Background:The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF) is a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure that is used to evaluate patients with patellofemoral pain.Purpose:To translate the KOOS-PF into the Thai language, to make necessary adaptations to a Thai cultural context, and to assess the measurement properties of the Thai version of the KOOS-PF (TH-KOOS-PF) using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.Study Design:Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study was conducted between December 2021 and May 2023. Language translation of the KOOS-PF was performed according to guidelines for the cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Eligible participants aged 18 to 50 years were asked to complete various patient-reported outcome measures including the TH-KOOS-PF at 3 time points: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline for test-retest reliability analysis, and 2 months after baseline for responsiveness assessment.Results:The KOOS-PF was successfully translated and culturally adapted to create the TH-KOOS-PF. A total of 86 participants (mean age, 37.0 ± 8.1 years; 59.3% female) with patellofemoral pain participated in the validation process. Construct validity of the TH-KOOS-PF was demonstrated by confirmation of all a priori hypotheses. The standardized Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.91), which indicated good internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92). The TH-KOOS-PF demonstrated good responsiveness, as evidenced by all predefined hypotheses' being confirmed, and there were no floor or ceiling effects. Using an anchor-based approach, the minimal clinically important difference was 11.6 points.Conclusion:The results of this study revealed the TH-KOOS-PF to be a valid, reliable, and responsive tool for assessing Thai patients with patellofemoral pain. The TH-KOOS-PF will be useful in both clinical and research settings.
orthopedics,sport sciences
-
Development on a hip functional score of adults based on patient-reported outcomes
Chen Shengbao,Xu Feng,Feng Yong,Jia Weitao,Hu Hai,Zhang Changqing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2018.21.005
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To develop a simple and patient-reported scoring system for evaluating the efficacy of functional reconstruction of adult hip diseases.Methods A candidate indicators list to evaluate hip function was established through literatures review and panel discussion.Using two rounds of Delphi method,experts were invited to judge and score the importance of screening indicators including pain,daily living ability,activity level,labor ability and self-assessment score of the overall hip status,with explanation of the degree of similarity and the basis for determination.In the second round of consultation,the content of integrity and rationality of the scale were added for evaluation.The final indexes of the scale were determined according to the boundary value of the indexes (average value,full frequency,coefficient of variation).The positive coefficient,authoritative coefficient,and coordination coefficient of the two rounds were calculated,and then the weights of each index was identified to form the final rating scale.Results Two rounds of Delphi reclaimed 25 and 24 experts' responses,which from 28 and 25 questionnaires,and the positive coefficients of the two rounds experts were 89.3％ and 96％,respectively.The authoritative coefficient of the first and second level indicators were generally above 0.85;and both of the expert coordination coefficient with the index importance (so called as Kendall coefficient) were above 0.3,and the second round of the coefficient was higher than the first one,and it indicated the final one was better at the consistency.The candidate index of "by bus" in the mobility was rejected in accordance with the threshold of the boundary value on the importance.Finally,it was determined that the hip scoring system (Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital,SSPH) consisted of two parts:the first part had ten indicators out of four dimensions such as pain,daily living ability,activity level,and labor ability;and the weight scores of these four aspects were 45,25,21,9,respectively.The second part was the patient's self-evaluation score for the overall status of the hip (VAS,out of 100 points);the total score was the sum of the two parts,and the final weights accounted for 85％ and 15％ between the two parts respectively.Conclusion The SSPH hip score based on patient-reported outcomes formed by the Delphi is simple and feasible,and it can be used as a reference for evaluating the clinical efficacy of hip functional reconstruction.