Abstract:BackgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly in demand for outcomes evaluation by hospitals, administrators, and policymakers. However, assessing total hip arthroplasty (THA) through such instruments is challenging because most existing measures of hip health are lengthy and/or proprietary.Questions/purposesThe objective of this study was to derive a patient-relevant short-form survey based on the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), focusing specifically on outcomes after THA.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent primary unilateral THA and who had completed preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMs using our hospital’s hip replacement registry. The 2-year followup in this population was 81% (4308 of 5351 patients). Of these, 2371 completed every item on the HOOS before surgery and at 2 years, making them eligible for the formal item reduction analysis. Through semistructured interviews with 30 patients, we identified items in the HOOS deemed qualitatively most important to patients with hip osteoarthritis. The original HOOS has 40 items, the four quality-of-life items were excluded a priori, five were excluded for being redundant, and one was excluded based on patient-relevance surveys. The remaining 30 items were evaluated using Rasch modeling to yield a final six-item HOOS, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR), representing a single construct of “hip health.” We calculated HOOS, JR scores for the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) cohort and validated this new score for internal consistency, external validity (versus HOOS and WOMAC domains), responsiveness to THA, and floor and ceiling effects. Additional external validation was performed using calculated HOOS, JR scores in collaboration with the Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement (FORCE-TJR) nationally representative joint replacement registry (n = 910).ResultsThe resulting six-item PROM (HOOS, JR) retained items only from the pain and activities of daily living domains. It showed high internal consistency (Person Separation Index, 0.86 [HSS]; 0.87 [FORCE]), moderate to excellent external validity against other hip surveys (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, 0.60–0.94), very high responsiveness (standardized response means, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.84–2.22] [FORCE]; and 2.38 [95% CI, 2.27–2.49] [HSS]), and favorable floor (0.6%–1.9%) and ceiling (37%–46%) effects. External validity was highest for the HOOS pain (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.86–0.89] [HSS]; and 0.87 [95% CI, 0.84–0.90] [FORCE]) and HOOS activities of daily living (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93–0.95] [HSS]; and 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93–0.96] [FORCE]) domains in the HSS validation cohort and the FORCE-TJR cohort.ConclusionsThe HOOS, JR provides a valid, reliable, and responsive measure of hip health for patients undergoing THA. This short-form PROM is patient relevant and efficient.Level of EvidenceLevel III, diagnostic study.

The Subjective Hip Value is a Valid, Reliable, and Responsive Instrument for Assessing Hip Function in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Validation of the HOOS, JR: A Short-form Hip Replacement Survey

The forgotten joint score-12 is a valid and responsive outcome tool for measuring success following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

Clinical relevance of patient-reported outcome measures in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

Assessing the measurement properties of PROMIS Computer Adaptive Tests, short forms and legacy patient reported outcome measures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Values Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Are Highly Dependent on Their Study Population and Calculation Methods: A Systematic Review

The haemophilia joint health score for the assessment of joint health in patients with haemophilia

The Promising 2-Year Performance of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery

Postoperative Harris Hip Score Versus Harris Hip Score Difference in Hip Replacement: What to Report?

Functional assessment in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Total Hip Replacement: Psychometric Validation of the Italian Version of Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)

Meaningful values in the Short Form Health Survey-36 after total knee arthroplasty – an alternative to the EuroQol five-dimension index as a measure for health-related quality of life

Rasch analysis of the forgotten joint score in patients with total hip arthroplasty

A high proportion of patients demonstrate recall bias in the retrospective collection of patient‐reported outcomes following hip arthroscopy

Utility of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Mental Health T-Score to Identify Patients at Risk for Poor Postsurgical Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

The problem of 'noise' in monitoring patient-based outcomes: generic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement

Patient-reported outcome score utilisation in arthroscopic hip preservation: we are all doing it differently, if at all

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcome measures following total hip arthroplasty and predictors of deterioration during follow-up: a seven-year prospective international multicentre study

Relationship Between Self-Reported Function, Functional Tests and Biomechanical Parameters in Patients 12 Months After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study