Collagen type I-based recombinant peptide promotes bone regeneration in rat critical-size calvarial defects by enhancing osteoclast activity at late stages of healing
Ichinnorov Chimedtseren,Shoji Yamahara,Yasunori Akiyama,Masaaki Ito,Yoshinori Arai,Anar Erdene Gantugs,Nagato Nastume,Taku Wakita,Takahiro Hiratsuka,Masaki Honda,Jorge Luis Montenegro Raudales
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2023.09.013
2023-10-06
Abstract:Introduction: We recently demonstrated the bone-forming potential of medium-cross-linked recombinant collagen peptide (mRCP) in animal models of bone defects. However, these studies were limited to a 4-week observation period; therefore, in the present study, we aimed to further evaluate mRCP as a suitable bone graft material for the alveolar cleft by analyzing its bone-forming potential, osteogenic-inducing ability, and biodegradation over an extended period of 12 weeks, using a rat critical-size calvarial defect model. Methods: Using Sprague-Dawley rats, we created critical-size calvarial defects through a surgical procedure. The defects were then filled with 3 mg of mRCP (mRCP group) or 18 mg of Cytrans® (CA) granules, which has a carbonate apatite-based composition resembling natural bone, was used as a reference material (CA group). For negative control, the defects were left untreated. Bone volume, total bone volume (bone volume including CA granules), and bone mineral density (BMD) in the defect were assessed using micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after implantation. Using histomorphometric analyses of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections, we measured the amount of newly formed bone and total newly formed bone (new bone including CA granules) in the entire defect site, as well as the amount of newly formed bone in the central side, two peripheral sides (left and right), periosteal (top) side, and dura mater (bottom) side. In addition, we measured the amount of residual bone graft material in the defect. Osteoclasts and osteoblasts in the newly formed bone were detected using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, respectively. Results: Bone volume in the mRCP group increased over time and was significantly larger at 8 and 12 weeks after surgery than at 4 weeks. The bone volume in the mRCP group was greater than that of the CA and control groups at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after implantation, and while the total bone volume was greater in the CA group after 4 and 8 weeks, the mRCP group had comparable levels of total bone volume to that of the CA group at 12 weeks after implantation. The BMD of the mRCP group reached similar levels to native calvaria bone at the same time point. H&E-stained sections revealed a larger amount of newly formed bone 12 weeks after implantation in the mRCP group compared to that of the CA and control groups. The total newly formed bone at 12 weeks after implantation was on par with that in the CA group. Furthermore, at the defect site, the area of newly formed bone was larger on the peripheral and dura mater sides. Notably, the number of osteoclasts in the mRCP group was higher than in the CA and control groups and peaked 8 weeks after implantation, which coincided with the timing of the greatest resorption of mRCP. Although the ALP-positive area was greater in the mRCP group compared to other groups, we did not detect any significant changes in the number of osteoblasts over time. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the bone-forming potential of mRCP over an extended period of 12 weeks, suggesting that mRCP sufficiently resists resorption to promote bone formation through induction of osteoclast activation in the late stages of the healing period.