Overseas Listing Location and Firm Investment: Comparison of Firms Listed in NASDAQ, Hong Kong and Singapore
Li Peixin,Xie Wei,Wang Baolian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2012.02.009
2012-01-01
Abstract:In this article,we study the relationship between overseas listing locations and firm investment of Chinese firms.Hong Kong and Singapore are similar with respect to information environment(e.g.disclosure level,earnings timeliness,earning transparency,freedom of press and analyst coverage) and institutional environment(e.g.shareholder rights,judicial efficiency,rule of law and insider trading enforcement),but NASDAQ has significant advantages.Information asymmetry problem can cause adverse selection problem and increase the costs of external capital,which can potentially lead to underinvestment problem.Agency problem can cause empire building of the managers,which can potentially lead to overinvestment problem.Better information environment and institutional environment can mitigate both information asymmetry problem and also the agency problem,thus decrease the problems of underinvestment and overinvestment.Consistent with these arguments,we find that,comparing with firms listed in Hong Kong and Singapore,firms listed in NASDAQ have lower investmentcash flow sensitivity.These results are robust after controlling other characteristic differences of firms listed in different exchanges,such as firm size,leverage and Tobin’s q.Consistent with the arguments that better information environment and institutional environment can mitigate the information asymmetry problem and agency problem,we also find that smaller,younger,higher accrual and lower leveraged firms benefit more by listing in NASDAQ.Using Richardson(2006)’s investment model,we decompose firm investment to normal fraction and under/overinvestment fraction.The results show direct evidence that listing in NASDAQ can indeed decrease both underinvestment and overinvestment.Mergers and acquisitions are very important investment decisions of firms and firms are mandatory to announce their merger and acquisition activities,thus they are not contaminated by self-selection problem.The results of mergers and acquisitions show that firms listed in NASDAQ have higher announcement period returns than firms listed in Hong Kong and Singapore.These set of results thus shed direct light on the differences in investment efficiency of firms listed at different locations.Overall,these findings suggest that the information and institutional advantages of NASDAQ all help in improving firms’ investment efficiency.