Abstract:In commercial networks, user nodes operating on batteries are assumed to be selfish to consume their resources (i.e., bandwidth and power) solely maximizing their own benefits (e. g., the received signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and datarates). In this paper, a cooperative game theoretical framework is proposed to jointly perform the bandwidth and power allocation for selfish cooperative relay networks. To ensure a fair and efficient resource sharing between two selfish user nodes, we assume that either node can act as a source as well as a potential relay for each other and either node is willing to seek cooperative relaying only if the datarate achieved through cooperation is not lower than that achieved through noncooperation (i.e., direct transmission) by consuming the same amount of bandwidth and power resource. Define the cooperative strategy of a node as the number of bandwidth and power that it is willing to contribute for relaying purpose. The two node joint bandwidth and power allocation (JBPA) problem can then be formulated as a cooperative game. Since the Nash bargaining solution (NBS) to the JBPA game (JBPAG) is computationally difficult to obtain, we divide it into two subgames, i.e., the bandwidth allocation game (BAG) and the power allocation game (PAG). We prove that both the subgames have unique NBS. And then the suboptimal NBS to the JBPAG can be achieved by solving the BAG and PAG sequentially. Simulation results show that the proposed cooperative game scheme is efficient in that the performance loss of the NBS result to that of the maximal overall data-rate scheme is small while the maximal-rate scheme is unfair. The simulation results also show that the NBS result is fair in that both nodes could experience better performance than they work independently and the degree of cooperation of a node only depends on how much contribution its partner can make to improve its own performance.

Strategy selection for wireless cooperative relaying based on game theory

A Cooperation Strategy Based on Nash Bargaining Solution in Cooperative Relay Networks

Joint Channel Bandwidth And Power Allocation Game For Selfish Cooperative Relaying Networks

Fair and Efficient Resource Sharing for Selfish Cooperative Communication Networks Using Cooperative Game Theory

A node grouping algorithm for joint relay selection and resource allocation in cooperative cognitive radio networks.

Optimal Power Control for Wireless Cooperative Relay Networks: a Cooperative Game Theoretic Approach.

A Suboptimal Joint Bandwidth and Power Allocation for Cooperative Relay Networks: a Cooperative Game Theoretic Approach

Relay selection and power allocation for cooperative networks using stackelberg game

Power Allocation In Cooperative Communication System Based On Coalitional Game

Optimal Relay Selection Strategy in Cognitive Cooperative Relaying Network

Bargaining Game Theoretic Power Control in Selfish Cooperative Relay Networks

Learning to Be Energy-Efficient in Cooperative Networks

Resource Allocation for Wireless Cooperative Networks: a Unified Cooperative Bargaining Game Theoretic Framework.

Partial Channel State Information Based Cooperative Relaying And Partner Selection

Distributed relay selection over multi-source and multi-relay wireless cooperative networks with selfish nodes

Power Allocation Scheme for Selfish Cooperative Communications Based on Game Theory and Particle Swarm Optimizer

A Game Theory Approach for Power Control and Relay Selection in Cooperative Communication Networks with Asymmetric Information.

Achieving User Cooperation Diversity in TDMA-Based Wireless Networks Using Cooperative Game Theory.

Particle Swarm Optimized Game Theory for Resource Allocation in Cooperative Networks

A Two-Layered Game Approach Based Relay’s Source Selection and Power Control for Wireless Cooperative Networks

Optimal relay selection strategies in heterogeneous cooperative relaying networks