Abstract:In commercial networks, user nodes operating on batteries are assumed to be selfish to consume their resources (i.e., bandwidth and power) solely maximizing their own benefits (e. g., the received signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and datarates). In this paper, a cooperative game theoretical framework is proposed to jointly perform the bandwidth and power allocation for selfish cooperative relay networks. To ensure a fair and efficient resource sharing between two selfish user nodes, we assume that either node can act as a source as well as a potential relay for each other and either node is willing to seek cooperative relaying only if the datarate achieved through cooperation is not lower than that achieved through noncooperation (i.e., direct transmission) by consuming the same amount of bandwidth and power resource. Define the cooperative strategy of a node as the number of bandwidth and power that it is willing to contribute for relaying purpose. The two node joint bandwidth and power allocation (JBPA) problem can then be formulated as a cooperative game. Since the Nash bargaining solution (NBS) to the JBPA game (JBPAG) is computationally difficult to obtain, we divide it into two subgames, i.e., the bandwidth allocation game (BAG) and the power allocation game (PAG). We prove that both the subgames have unique NBS. And then the suboptimal NBS to the JBPAG can be achieved by solving the BAG and PAG sequentially. Simulation results show that the proposed cooperative game scheme is efficient in that the performance loss of the NBS result to that of the maximal overall data-rate scheme is small while the maximal-rate scheme is unfair. The simulation results also show that the NBS result is fair in that both nodes could experience better performance than they work independently and the degree of cooperation of a node only depends on how much contribution its partner can make to improve its own performance.

Optimal Power Control for Wireless Cooperative Relay Networks: a Cooperative Game Theoretic Approach.

A Suboptimal Joint Bandwidth and Power Allocation for Cooperative Relay Networks: a Cooperative Game Theoretic Approach

Bargaining Game Theoretic Power Control in Selfish Cooperative Relay Networks

Optimal Power Control in Cooperative Relay Networks Based on a Differential Game

A Game Theory Approach for Power Control and Relay Selection in Cooperative Communication Networks with Asymmetric Information.

A Cooperation Strategy Based on Nash Bargaining Solution in Cooperative Relay Networks

Power Allocation Scheme for Selfish Cooperative Communications Based on Game Theory and Particle Swarm Optimizer

Fair and Efficient Resource Sharing for Selfish Cooperative Communication Networks Using Cooperative Game Theory

Energy-efficient Power Allocation for Selfish Cooperative Communication Networks Using Bargaining Game

Fair And Energy-Efficient Cooperative Relaying With Selfish Nodes

Performance Improvement Algorithms Based on Bargaining Game Theory for Wireless Cooperative Relay Networks

Partner Selection Strategies in Cooperative Wireless Networks with Optimal Power Distribution

Towards Energy-Efficiency in Selfish, Cooperative Networks

Cooperation and Distributed Optimization for the Unreliable Wireless Game with Indirect Reciprocity.

Learning to Be Energy-Efficient in Cooperative Networks

Optimal Power Control for Cognitive Radio Networks under Coupled Interference Constraints: A Cooperative Game-Theoretic Perspective

Power Allocation In Cooperative Communication System Based On Coalitional Game

Self-optimization of Resource Allocation in Cooperative Relay Networks

Joint Channel Bandwidth And Power Allocation Game For Selfish Cooperative Relaying Networks

Resource Allocation in Wireless Powered Relay Networks: A Bargaining Game Approach

A Two-Layered Game Approach Based Relay’s Source Selection and Power Control for Wireless Cooperative Networks