Abstract:Abstract Background and Aims This study evaluates an integrated care program for chronic kidney disease (CKD), which has demonstrated effectiveness in delaying kidney function decline in the rural population of Thailand. Efficacy of the program was initially established through the ESCORT-1 study, a cluster-randomized controlled trial (doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0414-4), and further demonstrated the effectiveness by the larger-scale prospective cohort study, ESCORT-2 (doi: 10.1111/nep.13849). The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of incorporating this program into Thailand's public health benefit package, with the goal of establishing it as a model for similar rural areas in resource-limited settings. Method Following the Thailand's guideline for health technology assessment, a cost-utility analysis utilizing data from the ESCORT studies, local databases, and literatures. The integrated care program was tailored to primary healthcare system by using preexisting workforces. It involved a collaboration between Multi-Disciplinary Care Teams (MDCT) at district hospitals and Community Care Network (CCN) teams at Sub-District Health Centers (SDHC). The MDCT, comprising general practitioners, CKD nurse managers, pharmacists, a nutritionist, and a physical therapist, provided key patient education on diet, medication adherence, exercise, and avoiding certain medications and herbal remedies. The CCN teams, including community nurses and village health volunteers, conducted home visits for health monitoring and lifestyle guidance. Both MDCT and CCN personnel received training in CKD care based on the NKF-K/DOQI and KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines. A decision-analytic Markov model and Monte-Carlo simulation were applied to quantify and compare the lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) outcomes of the intervention and conventional-care from a societal perspective considering both direct and indirect costs. The analysis included extensive sensitivity analyses, incorporating a probabilistic model and scenario-analyses based on patient ages, CKD stages, and varying program efficacy. Additionally, a budget impact analysis from the payer's perspective assessed the financial impact and affordability over a five-year period. Results The integrated care program was found to dominate conventional care. The results indicated an incremental cost-effectiveness of (-)278,000 Thai Baht (∼7,267 EUR) per QALY for the base case analysis. Probabilistic analysis demonstrated consistent outcomes, with the integrated care program being cost-effective at almost 100% of the time during analysis at the 160,000 Thai Baht (∼4,182 EUR) willingness-to-pay threshold (Fig. 1). These results are driven by significant cost savings due to reduced time and overall costs in dialysis before death. The program is most cost-effective when provided early to patients, in terms of both age and CKD stages (Fig. 2). The budget impact analysis showed that introducing the intervention could save the payer 184 billion Thai Baht (4.76 billion EUR) over five years. (The exchange rate; 1 Thai Baht = 38.26 EUR) Conclusion The integrated care program for patients with stage 3-4 CKD is cost-effective and suitable for inclusion in Thailand's health benefit package, mainly due to its significant cost savings and enhanced health outcomes. The program's design, focusing on sustainability and feasibility by utilizing existing workforces, positions it as a viable model for similar economic and healthcare contexts, especially in resource-limited countries.

Ambulatory knee arthroscopic surgery yields cost savings and improved health outcomes

Knee arthroscopy-assisted ambulatory surgery:Practice and considerations

Short-term clinical outcomes of outpatient total hip arthroplasty

The Cost-Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

Early Assessment of the Likely Cost-Effectiveness of a New Technology: A Markov Model with Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis of Computer-Assisted Total Knee Replacement

Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Are Highly Cost-Effective Procedures: The Importance of Duration of Follow-Up

Understanding economic analysis and cost-effectiveness of CT scan-guided, 3-dimensional, robotic-arm assisted lower extremity arthroplasty: a systematic review

Lifetime Cost-Effectiveness of Knee Osteoarthritis Therapy in Australia

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Intelligent Electronic Medical Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Varus Knee Osteoarthritis

Using orthopaedic health care resources efficiently: A cost analysis of day surgery for unicompartmental knee replacement

#1381 Economic evaluation of an integrated care program versus conventional care for chronic kidney disease patients in rural communities of Thailand

Cost-utility analysis of early reconstruction surgery versus conservative treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injury in a lower-middle income country

Total knee arthroplasty in the outpatient vs inpatient settings: impact of site of care on early postoperative economic and clinical outcomes

Lifetime Cost-Effectiveness of Structured Education and Exercise Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis in Australia

The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach is cost-effective when compared with posterolateral and direct anterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty

The Impact of Arthroscopy on Surgical Decision-Making and Outcomes in Osteoarthritis Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

The cost of total hip arthroplasty: compare the hospitalization costs of national centralized procurement and national volume-based procurement

Economic Evaluation of an Integrated Care Program Compared to Conventional Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in Rural Communities of Thailand

A comparative study of single-stage bilateral vs. unilateral medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on complications, clinical outcomes, and costs

Do modern total knee replacements offer better value for money? A health economic analysis

Economics of Surgical Treatment of Knee Arthritis – A US Perspective