Abstract:Current static verification techniques support a wide range of programs. However, such techniques only support complete and detailed specifications, which places an undue burden on users. To solve this problem, prior work proposed gradual verification, which handles complete, partial, or missing specifications by soundly combining static and dynamic checking. Gradual verification has also been extended to programs that manipulate recursive, mutable data structures on the heap. Unfortunately, this extension does not reward users with decreased dynamic checking as specifications are refined. In fact, all properties are checked dynamically regardless of any static guarantees. Additionally, no full-fledged implementation of gradual verification exists so far, which prevents studying its performance and applicability in practice. We present Gradual C0, the first practicable gradual verifier for recursive heap data structures, which targets C0, a safe subset of C designed for education. Static verifiers supporting separation logic or implicit dynamic frames use symbolic execution for reasoning; so Gradual C0, which extends one such verifier, adopts symbolic execution at its core instead of the weakest liberal precondition approach used in prior work. Our approach addresses technical challenges related to symbolic execution with imprecise specifications, heap ownership, and branching in both program statements and specification formulas. We also deal with challenges related to minimizing insertion of dynamic checks and extensibility to other programming languages beyond C0. Finally, we provide the first empirical performance evaluation of a gradual verifier, and found that on average, Gradual C0 decreases run-time overhead between 11-34% compared to the fully-dynamic approach used in prior work. Further, the worst-case scenarios for performance are predictable and avoidable.

Review of Recent Heap Specification and Verification Techniques

Applying Rely-Guarantee Reasoning on Concurrent Memory Management and Mailbox in C/OS-II: A Case Study

Applying Rely-Guarantee Reasoning on Concurrent Memory Management and Mailbox in μC/OS-II: A Case Study.

Deciding Memory Safety for Single-Pass Heap-Manipulating Programs

Decoupling lock-free data structures from memory reclamation for static analysis

Heaps Don't Lie: Countering Unsoundness with Heap Snapshots

Which Part of the Heap is Useful? Improving Heap Liveness Analysis

Rely-guarantee Reasoning about Concurrent Memory Management: Correctness, Safety and Security

Arithmetizing Shape Analysis

Top of the Heap: Efficient Memory Error Protection of Safe Heap Objects

Efficient Synthesis of Method Call Sequences for Test Generation and Bounded Verification.

Heap Reference Analysis for Functional Programs

Gradual C0: Symbolic Execution for Gradual Verification

Efficient and Precise Points-to Analysis: Modeling the Heap by Merging Equivalent Automata

An Abstract Domain for Heap Commutativity (Extended Version)

Dynamic heap type inference for program understanding and debugging

Scalable and Extensible Static Memory Safety Analysis with Summary over Access Path

Shooting from the heap: ultra-scalable static analysis with heap snapshots

Exploiting Pointer Analysis in Memory Models for Deductive Verification

Compositional Verification of Heap-Manipulating Programs through Property-Guided Learning

Software Verification for Weak Memory via Program Transformation