Different Green/General Innovation Strategies among Subsidized Enterprises with Different Ownerships
Zi-Meng Liu,Xu Li,Xuerong Peng,Seoki Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.15945abstract
2019-01-01
Academy of Management Proceedings
Abstract:To encourage enterprise to engage in general and green innovation behaviors, governments often offer diverse subsidies to compensate their positive spillovers. How enterprises allocate the subsidies to general and green innovation? Additionally, what is the heterogeneous response of innovation among subsidized enterprises with different ownerships (i.e., private owned enterprises, POEs; local state-owned enterprises, LSOEs; central state-owned enterprises, CSOEs)? To answer these questions, this study proposes that regardless of ownership difference, subsidized enterprises are more likely to engage in general innovation than green innovation (H1), because green innovation has double spillovers problem. Furthermore, we propose innovation intensity varies among subsidized enterprises with different ownership and argue that, with governmental subsidies, the intensity of both general innovation (H2) and green innovation (H3) from high to low is POEs, CSOEs and LSOEs, because enterprises with different ownerships submit to different institutional logic, face different institutional pressures and hold different endorsement of resources and capabilities. H1 and H3 are supported by the empirical results based on the panel data 2010-2016 of 175 listed pharmaceutical firms in China.