Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

Does internationalization encourage state-owned enterprises to utilize subsidies to innovate? Evidence from high-tech and automobile manufacturing industries of Chinese listed companies

Can government subsidies improve innovation performance? Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Green or Nongreen Innovation? Different Strategic Preferences among Subsidized Enterprises with Different Ownership Types

The Effect of Government Subsidies on Firm R&D Investment in China: From Perspectives of Ownership and Market Power

Do government subsidies promote enterprise innovation?——Evidence from Chinese listed companies

The Impact of Industrial Subsidies and Enterprise Innovation on Enterprise Performance: Evidence from Listed Chinese Manufacturing Companies

Different Green/General Innovation Strategies among Subsidized Enterprises with Different Ownerships

Government Subsidies and Firm Technological Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study Based on Panel Data of High-tech Firms

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

Behavior and Influence Mechanisms of Enterprises Using Government Subsidies: Evidence from China

Subsidized or Not, the Impact of Firm Internationalization on Green Innovation—Based on a Dynamic Panel Threshold Model

Foreign Ownership and State-Owned Enterprises' Innovation: The Mediating Role of Host Country's Innovation Level and the Moderating Effect of Government Innovation Subsidies

Innovation and export performance of emerging market enterprises: The roles of state and foreign ownership in China

The Relationships between Government Subsidies, Innovation Input, and Innovation Output: Evidence from the New Generation of Information Technology Industry in China

More Government Subsidies, More Innovation of New Energy Firms? Evidence from China

Do government subsidies promote enterprise green innovation? Evidence from listed companies in China

More government subsidies, more green innovation? The evidence from Chinese new energy vehicle enterprises

Research on the Promotion Effect of Government Subsidies on Innovation of High-Tech Enterprises

The effect of government subsidies on firms' innovation performance: does subsidy continuity matter?

How much state ownership is more conducive to corporate innovation in firms? Evidence from China

The Impact of Corporate Innovation on Environmental Performance: The Moderating Effect of Financing Constraints and Government Subsidies