Abstract:Due to a rapid economic growth over the past several decades China has significantly strengthened its international positions. This growth in its own turn was to a large extent due to a pragmatic and sound foreign strategy that the country has been pursuing since mid-1970s. However, in recent years both within and outside China there has been an on-going debate on the alleged radical transformation of the PRC’s perceptions of its national interests, its place in world politics, and its foreign policy. The variety of opinions becomes increasingly complicated as the number of discussants grows and new arguments are adduced in support of different positions. Whereas outside China this debate structures around the narrative of the Chinese assertiveness, within the country the main dispute is between the advocates of a traditional policy of ‘keeping a low profile’ (taoguang yanghui) and proponents of a new ‘striving for achievements’ (fenfa youwei) strategy. The present paper aims to provide a framework for a systematization of debates on the contemporary foreign policy of China in the English language academic literature based on two criteria: whether a researcher admits that the Chinese foreign policy is changing and how he assesses implications of these changes. Such an approach undoubtedly entails certain schematization of the presented views and arguments. However, it differs favorably from traditional, more narrative approaches to conceptualization of the debate since it establishes a clear, transparent theoretical framework aimed to identify the substantive core of the presented views. This, in turn, can bring about a better understanding of the current state and possible evolution of Chinese foreign policy in general. The author concludes that although these debates are far from being over, most researchers admit the PRC’s foreign policy strategy is undergoing a radical transformation. Since the latter half of 2000s there has been a steady trend in the foreign policy of China towards greater assertiveness. At the same time this transformation ensures continuity of the basic principles of Chinese diplomacy. All this means that further debates on the Chinese foreign policy should focus primarily on potential implications of this transformation for the PRC, the regional dynamics and international relations system as a whole.

Bureaucratic Politics and Chinese Foreign Policy-Making

Evolving Bureaucratic Politics in Chinese Foreign Policy-Making

Evaluation of China's Bureaucratic Reforms

Harmonising The Management Of Foreign And Domestic Affairs In Chinese Foreign Policy

From One-Level Games to Two-Level Games:The Evolution of China’s Foreign Policy-Making Model

Political Dynamics and Bureaucratic Career Patterns in the People's Republic of China, 1949-1994

Bridging Chinese Foreign Policy Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis: Towards a Research Agenda for Mutual Gains

Balancing Local Concerns and Global Views: Western Administrative Theory in China’s Reform Practices

Inside and Outside: the Modernized Hierarchy That Runs China

CHINA FOREIGN POLICY: A LEGAL ANALYSIS

Politics-Administration Dichotomy Debate and Its Relevance to China's Governance Reform

Revisiting Chinese Political Culture: The Historical Politics Approach

The Bureaucratic System and Negotiation Network:A Theoretical Framework and Case Study of China’s Policy Process

Studies on China's public policy process by western scholars: perspectives and implications

Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

The ‘bureaucratized’ Project System: an Organizational Study of Chinese Central Governmental Earmarked Projects

The Administrative Subcontract: Significance, Relevance and Implications for Intergovernmental Relations in China

Bureau Chiefs and Policy Experts in the Chinese Policy Decision-Making Process: Making Guanxi More Influential

The Cadre Evaluation System at the Grass Roots: The Paradox of Party Rule

Three Perspectives to Understand Public Policy Process and their Implications for China Study